×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

(OP)
Dear All,

Is there min beam to beam girder depth ratio that allows you to assume that beam girders bottom flange is braced in case of negative bending?
I have a case that my beam girders are 33in deep and the beams are only 16in.
Thanks

RE: Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

My engineering judgment tells me that the bottom flange is not braced.  If you are in a bind, and can't add diagonal bracing from the bottom flange to the beam framing in, then...
You could check the web of the beam bending like a plate (weak axis bending).  The force applied at the bottom flange would be the bottom flange buckling force (2% of the bottom flange axial force would be some engineers' estimate).  The moment in the web would be this force times the distance between the bottom flange and the bottom of the connection angles at the beam framing in.

DaveAtkins

RE: Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

I agree with DaveAtkins, I would not consider the  bottom flange braced without some further investigation in this situation.

FWIW: Another idea I have used, is to use a full height stiffener plate as both a single shear connection plate for the beam coming in, and to brace the bottom flange of the girder.  

RE: Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

In a lot of stability articles I've read, and from a seminar by Dr. Joe Yura at Texas, I know that if you prohibit beam rotation, that is actually more effective in bracing the beam against LTB than by simply laterally bracing the compression flange.

The connection between the intersecting beams and the girder may or may not help in resisting rotation of the supporting girder.  One method of achieving this is to extend the connection through to the bottom flange such that any rotation would be effectively resisted by the connection.  Now this would also probably require pretensioned bolts in the connection but even with pure bearing connections, the small slip might be allowed and still offer enough stiffness and strength to resist LTB.

RE: Unbraced Bottom Flange Length

You can check the girder with the beam providing torsional bracing.  This is in Appendix 6.3 of the new AISC 360-05 code.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources