×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

(OP)
Hello all,

I am designing an adjacent box beam bridge and am wondering what would be a good way to connect the transverse tie rods at the crown of the road, which slopes 2% in each direction.  As this is a wide bridge (100' roadway) we cannot just slope the deck on top of level beams because the added dead load is too great.  There is also no skew so stepping the tie beam as is done is skewed bridges is not allowable.  We have an example done by another company that just shows the tie rod bent at the crown and wedge plates between the beams.  Is this the best way to connect the beams?  Thanks

RE: Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

Here’s how Ohio DOT handles your situation, see sheet 2/4:

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/se/standard/english/revisions/07-19-02%20mailing/pdf/2002cms/psbd193.pdf

You can see the tie rods only extend through 2 or 3 beams and then overlap with another tie rod.  This is done even when there is no skew.  Using this arrangement the hole in the box beam is made large enough to make up for the change in cross slope at the crown.

Another thing you could do is call a local precaster.  They are usually very helpful and will probably be able to answer your question better than we could here.  

Also, why is stepping the tie rods not allowable when you don’t have a skew??

RE: Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

The OhioDOT detail would seem to work for Tie Rods or PT strands but seems like a hassle for normal width bridges.

All of the designs I have done have used 7-wire strand for the transverse PT and the strand simply follows the crown of the roadway across the bridge.

That is a very wide bridge for butted box beams.  If you have not done so already, I would recommend that you review the PCI Bridge Design Manual for the section on transverse PT design of butted beams for wide bridges.

RE: Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

@TTK - The ODOT tie rod method is actually not that bad for normal width bridges using tie rods.  I have see a few 40’ or so wide adjacent box beam bridges erected in Ohio using this method.  The rods are installed by the laborers while the crane is picking the next box.  I could see though how this method would be a hassle if using transverse PT.

In Michigan we use transverse PT and let the strands follow the crown as you noted.

RE: Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

The ODOT detail seems very awkward with respect to installing the boxes.

RE: Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

Cumbersome or not, that is the same detail used by a lot of State DOT for low volume bridges.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Tie Rod Connection at Crown of Adjacent Box Beams

The Ohio detail is very similiar to the Oregon DOT method

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources