Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
(OP)
I have designed a house using my mechanical engineering knowledge and lots of research. The house will be built in the Pacific Northwest on the Olympic Peninsula. When discussing my design with contractors in that area, I was constantly questioned about building on a slab. They kept insisting I should build with a crawlspace. I hate crawlspaces. I just can't stand walking around and hearing the slightest thump thump, cold feet, the added expense of a foundation and a floor, and mainly, the lack of thermal mass.
The contractors and builders would state reasons not to build on a slab such as, moisture problems, hard on knees and hips, can't easily re-model and move the kitchen, and lack of insulation. In talking to forward thinking builders, engineers, and from my own knowledge, I realize that none of these are issues. There are a few homes in my area on a slab, which are properly built that work well. I know the owners. Some are passive solar, but more on that later.
So I ask builders in the PNW why they build with a crawlspace, and have yet to get a real answer. One answer I get from builders is, “that’s just the way we build here”. I’m guessing there are several reasons. Could it be a hold over from when concrete was expensive or non-existent and wood was almost free? Could it be that builders can get more money for a crawlspace house? One reason I heard that makes sense is, “We’re building on crawlspaces, making money, so why change?” I even had one builder state that with equivalent houses, one on a slab, the other on a crawlspace, the slab house will be perceived as a “cheaper” house.
My design consists of a perimeter foundation footing, perimeter walls using ICF’s, and first floor walls made of ICF’s. Insulation will be on the very bottom by the perimeter footings, then about 2.5 feet of compacted fill, then the internal cap slab. This is to capture as much insulated thermal mass as possible with this design. Radiant tubing will be down in the insulated earth box and in the slab. When the solar collectors have satisfied the slab, they then pump heat down in the earth box for later use. Such a design will “coast” through a month long power outage with freezing outside temperatures and should only loose a few degrees a week. And with PV panels to power the radiant pump, a power outage will be a thermal non-issue. The house will look normal but be passive solar in that most of the windows will be south facing. No serious calculations were done, just good sound design practices utilized. So what about the summer? With a passive solar design, there will be minimal gain in the summer due to the high sun. And with high thermal mass, the house will be an average of the heat in during the day and heat out during the night. No forced air needed here.
There is a house on the Peninsula, well actually many, poorly designed and placed with large expanses of glass facing west and on a crawlspace. When seen in a summer afternoon, all windows are covered with shades and I’ll be the AC is running. It’s the sun. It’s thermonuclear. This is with the ambient temperature in the 60’s. And because of the low thermal mass, it’s conceivable that the heater might be needed the next morning. Low thermal mass, big temperature swings, and the more active the heating and cooling system will be.
The contractors and builders would state reasons not to build on a slab such as, moisture problems, hard on knees and hips, can't easily re-model and move the kitchen, and lack of insulation. In talking to forward thinking builders, engineers, and from my own knowledge, I realize that none of these are issues. There are a few homes in my area on a slab, which are properly built that work well. I know the owners. Some are passive solar, but more on that later.
So I ask builders in the PNW why they build with a crawlspace, and have yet to get a real answer. One answer I get from builders is, “that’s just the way we build here”. I’m guessing there are several reasons. Could it be a hold over from when concrete was expensive or non-existent and wood was almost free? Could it be that builders can get more money for a crawlspace house? One reason I heard that makes sense is, “We’re building on crawlspaces, making money, so why change?” I even had one builder state that with equivalent houses, one on a slab, the other on a crawlspace, the slab house will be perceived as a “cheaper” house.
My design consists of a perimeter foundation footing, perimeter walls using ICF’s, and first floor walls made of ICF’s. Insulation will be on the very bottom by the perimeter footings, then about 2.5 feet of compacted fill, then the internal cap slab. This is to capture as much insulated thermal mass as possible with this design. Radiant tubing will be down in the insulated earth box and in the slab. When the solar collectors have satisfied the slab, they then pump heat down in the earth box for later use. Such a design will “coast” through a month long power outage with freezing outside temperatures and should only loose a few degrees a week. And with PV panels to power the radiant pump, a power outage will be a thermal non-issue. The house will look normal but be passive solar in that most of the windows will be south facing. No serious calculations were done, just good sound design practices utilized. So what about the summer? With a passive solar design, there will be minimal gain in the summer due to the high sun. And with high thermal mass, the house will be an average of the heat in during the day and heat out during the night. No forced air needed here.
There is a house on the Peninsula, well actually many, poorly designed and placed with large expanses of glass facing west and on a crawlspace. When seen in a summer afternoon, all windows are covered with shades and I’ll be the AC is running. It’s the sun. It’s thermonuclear. This is with the ambient temperature in the 60’s. And because of the low thermal mass, it’s conceivable that the heater might be needed the next morning. Low thermal mass, big temperature swings, and the more active the heating and cooling system will be.





RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
just some ramblings, Dik
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Putting ducting in the crawlspace is not good. There will be thermal losses. Radiant heat in an insulated slab is much more comfortable and is less expensive than forced heated air. But the contractor will not tell you that.
Even if what you say is correct, the benefits and comfort of thermal mass overcome the few shortfalls of having the space in a crawlspace.
The best way to control moisture is to not have it present. Direct the water away from the house.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Having said that, my experience has been that even with perimeter insulation and underslab insulation, they tend to be cold and colder without underslab insul. The only manner in which they are warm is if hydronic in-slab heating is used (and I've done several of these). In these areas, hydronics are more expensive than forced air, although there is likely a payback time.
It's common to put ducting in the crawlspace from the furnace. The space is relatively clear and most of the heatloss is up through the main floor.
Dik
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Why?
"In addition you have to use PEVB to separate the slab from moisture below."
Why?
"Having said that, my experience has been that even with perimeter insulation and underslab insulation, they tend to be cold and colder without underslab insul."
No way. Show me the math.
"The only manner in which they are warm is if hydronic in-slab heating is used (and I've done several of these)."
Hydronic will heat the slab, of course.
"In these areas, hydronics are more expensive than forced air, although there is likely a payback time."
Hydronic is more expensive because it is new. Price out the materials from Radiantec and see for yourself. Don't think you need a 5K boiler either. A $300.00 water heater will be fine for the average well insulated house.
"It's common to put ducting in the crawlspace from the furnace. The space is relatively clear and most of the heatloss is up through the main floor."
Yea, well I've lived in a rental on a crawlspace and when the resistive electric forced air comes on there is a blast of cold air first before the hot air warms the ducts. In that house, it is cheaper to run all the lights, computers, TV, oven, etc. than to run the forced air. In that house in the winter it is a waste to use fluorescent instead of incandescent. Think about it.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Dik
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
The residential construction in my area, and in the very cold ski areas, tends to be about 50/50. When it is all said and done, the homeowner's preference seems to be the final issue. I have dealt with people from all over the U.S. and either system is considered to be the 'cheap' system somewhere. I make no attempt to argue someone out of their preference.
I have lived on both and I prefer a properly built crawlspace. Properly built slabs tend to have a high initial cost, especially if shallow groundwater is a problem. Poorly designed houses, lots of glass, do not perform well with either crawlspace or slab. Well designed houses, from a heating/cooling & conservation standpoint, are not very popular.
I have consulted on many moving foundations and moisture related problems. Either floor system has weaknesses. In my experience, the crawlspace tends to be easier to repair. Over the longterm, most structural and mechanical repairs on slabs tend to be more expensive. The key appears to be to build in a manner which will minimize later repair.
"You have to direct the water away, in particular in areas which have significant cold weather."
Why? I HAVE NEVER SEEN A WET SUBGRADE/SLAB IN A SKI/COLD RESORT AREA WHICH WAS CONSIDERED COMFORTABLE OR PERFORMING WELL.
"In addition you have to use PEVB to separate the slab from moisture below."
Why? MOISTURE COMING THROUGH A SLAB CREATES MORE PROBLEMS THAN JUST POTENTIAL HEAT LOSS.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
What I meant was why is water in contact with a basement wall or slab bad. I'm intereted i the technical reason. Here is the answer I was looking for.
I was in a hotel in MA in January and the slab was in contact with the snow outside. There was condensation on the floor in the corner of my room's tile floor. Water in contact with a slab will conduct the heat away fast because water has high heat capacity and thermal conductivity. If snow is piled up against the edge or the ground is frozen, the concrete will loose heat fast and condensate will form on the inside. It amazes me when I see basement walls sprayed with water proofing and dirt piled up on the outside. Then for insulation, a wall is framed on the inside and insulated with fiberglass. What a recipe for mold. I would bet that most wet basement walls get blamed on water "migrating" through the concrete when the actual problem is condensation. I'm not talking about a genuine crack and water is pouring in, in that case, the basement is really leaking.
A poorly designed crawlspace will perform better than a poorly built slab. This is because a crawlspace is disconnected from the earth and could not be in contact with large amounts of water. A poorly designed slab or basement could be in contact with large amounts of water.
But, a properly designed slab or basement will perform better and be more stable thermally because of the coupling with large amounts of dry earth.
I would question the higher cost and I have quotes to prove otherwise.
Search: "high thermal mass homes" to learn more.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Dik
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
http://www.radiantcompany.com/system/
I am pretty sure the nice houses I designed are proabably using the system you described Dik.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
With slab on grade, it all depends on the site. Each situation should be looked at fresh. Too many in engineering only listen and never research or think on their own. Keep the water away from the thermal mass and insulate the thermal mass. How it's done does not matter. If the site is on top of a hill of gravel, only insulation is needed. If it's in a flat area, raise it up on some compacted insulated fill. It is a misconception that water will somehow find the slab and migrate to it. Shed the water away and insulate the slab.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
What exactly is a "nice" house? I have heard of extremely high quotes for hydronic systems. It's probably because of the newness and builders are reluctant to change for fear of eating a house. Price out the materials and labor and you will see what I mean. If heating only is needed, it can be very reasonable to install a radiant system. I know several owners who installed their own because of the high quotes.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Dik
Dik
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
I'm thinking it could be a case of "what's your budget" construction. A builder asked me that and I said I have no budget, but I do have an idea of what I would spend on building my house and know one will know that but me.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Whoever you know with heated driveways, see if you can get me invited to the next party! Got to be a good one. Salmon, fresh veggies, Cabernet, Chocolates.....
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
First you will excavate to below frost for your wall footings. Then you will typically backfill the footings and make grade on native soil. If you chose soil replacement to below frost, youu will have significant costs associated with that work. Mostiure into the slab is controled by perimeter drains and a moisture barrier.Site drainage, including foundation drains is very important, however in residential work it is often done poorly or wrong as often as it is done right. The biggest problem with slab on grade is frost. If the ground freezes and the fill heaves, the slab will split in two. I used to live in NY State and have seen it happen. Once that occurs, the strucure generally can not be salvaged.
The othe reason is that if you ever need to access drains the slab will need to be cut. All first floor water will be in the ceiling, again making repairs or modifacations difficult. These are the reasons I belive crawl spaces may be used in luie of a slab on grade. The great thing about this country is that you can do whatever you want. Me, I would go for the full basement. I would suggest you talk to the local building offical about crawl spaces vs. slabs, as there is probably a lot of local history on both.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
The locals are hopeless as they continue to give the reasons I mentioned in the first post. Could it be as simple as craawlspace is the way they have been doing it and reluctant to change? I have seen very complex foundations for full height crawlspaces with a dirt floor. For just a bit more cement, they could have had a basement.
In my design, and as a few other owner builders are doing, ICF's are used down to good ground and the inside is filled and capped with a slab. The ground and earth box below it will stay very dry. I might even toss in a bit of umbrella insulation too.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
I like the SOG; however, the slab curled when it cured, making subtle peaks at the joints. This was a pain when installing wood floors and tile in some rooms, and is noticeable in the carpeted rooms. I have wanted to remodel and would have to pull up the slab to do it (to move sewer), so this is a downfall.
For the heating, there is forced air, with the ducts run below the slab. In the winter, it only runs at night to counter the leaky windows. In the winter the house is up to 85 on sunny days, and the heat is only on from about 8pm to 8am. I think this would be reduced substantially with newer windows. The debate with my wife is “How energy efficient should they be to not reduce the solar effects?”
I was thinking it would be nice to add radiant heat to the main portion of my house, installed over the main slab. I have plenty of headroom with vaulted ceilings (up to 16 feet), and few doorways to contend with. Some of the tank less water heaters I have looked at state that they can be used for radiant heat as well. Some just use isolation so they can do both the water and heating needs.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
If your getting that much temperature swings between nigh and day, your house does not have enough thermal mass. Is the basement insulated? Is it insulated on the inside walls?
I would suggest looking into insulating the perimeter ground with wing insulation and pouring a cap on the slab with radiant tubes. This would solve your curling slab. What was the reason for the slab curling?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Lots of discussion.
Placing a topping or capping the slab may or may not be effective.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Our furnace was out for a few days, and we maintained in the upper 60's at night with 80’s in the day, while the neighbors were continuously running the heat.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Most basements in this area, even new construction, are concrete right up to the wet earth. What a recipe for mold. Isn't there a test to take before one works for the county or gets a contractor license?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
Crawlspaces are generally chosen over slab on grade for structural reasons. Perhaps a couple questions may help on your quest for knowledge:
1) What is the expected differential movement of the undisturbed soil at the site?
2) What is the expected differential movement of the soil at the site once 2.5 feet of soil are replaced with fill?
3) Will the fill be compacted? Or are you prepared for the settlement which will occur?
4) What is the expected settlement of the soil beneath the exterior footings?
5) Will the expected settlement / expansion of the soil cause problems in the veneer on your house?
6) Will the exterior footings be beneath the frost line? If not, heaving will wreck your exterior walls.
Where I work, there are several different soil types. On one side of the city is clay. When we design foundations there, it is typically more economical to use a crawlspace (suspended foundation). If the owner absolutely insists on a slab on grade, the geotech often recommends 7+ feet of soil removal and replacement with select fill. With this amount of fill, you'll also experience settlement issues. 7 feet is typically the breakeven point for economy between slab on grade vs. suspended. So for this side of the city, you either get a suspended foundation, or a house that will almost definitely have wall cracking problems, especially if someone built it cheap, like one of the national homebuilders.
On the other side of the city, the soil is a bit better, mostly rock, or weathered limestone. The norm here is slab on grade without too much fill.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
You bet. Sometimes I feel that I'm being haunted, like right now!
"You dismiss far too easily the way things are usually done on the premise that builders have no reasons other than supreme ignorance or to build a fatter profit."
No, I discussed this with the local builders, and local engineers. Local builders just say that that's the way we have always built. Local engineers like SOG as they design all commercial building that way.
"Crawlspaces are generally chosen over slab on grade for structural reasons. Perhaps a couple questions may help on your quest for knowledge:"
1) What is the expected differential movement of the undisturbed soil at the site?
Not much, glacial till hard as rock with some clay down deeper.
2) What is the expected differential movement of the soil at the site once 2.5 feet of soil are replaced with fill?
Not much as the fill will be compacted. (Hang on, we just had an earthquake.... no wait, it's was my 9 year old chasing my 7 year old through the rental we're in and yup, it's on a crawlspace.)
3) Will the fill be compacted? Or are you prepared for the settlement which will occur?
Yes
4) What is the expected settlement of the soil beneath the exterior footings?
Engineer said everything is OK.
5) Will the expected settlement / expansion of the soil cause problems in the veneer on your house?
Not likely, doesn't on other houses here. Why should it?
6) Will the exterior footings be beneath the frost line? If not, heaving will wreck your exterior walls.
Frost line isn't very deep here but I'd put wing insulation if it was.
But here is a clincher. If crawlspaces are necessary here, why do all commercial building have SOG or perimeter footings with a cap slab? The local engineers all say SOG is no problem and that we even have better soil for it than in other areas that use SOG.
Thanks for your concern.
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
RE: Why Crawlspaces instead of Slab on grade?
As far as fill, I've seen new crawlspace construction "push out" a considerable amount of fill which is then trucked out to build the crawlspace. This is to get the house level with the surrounding grade.
Just yesterday I heard of another reason crawlspaces are the most common new construction method in the Pacific Northwest. Their reason was that after WW2, many cheap houses were tossed together on uninsulated slabs down in the wet earth. They were so cold and damp, gee I wonder why, that crawlspaces became the preferred method of construction. I guess that makes sense too.