×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Ovelap Backup Design

Ovelap Backup Design

Ovelap Backup Design

(OP)
Hi All!

Recently I found a conceptual description of a Wastewater treatment plant where "Overlap Backup Design" is mentioned as a philosophy of design. From that philosophy it is proposed to install two parallel separation trains wich includes: coalescer, flotation unit and filter. Each train normally would receive fluids from different sources.

 I really don't understand the exact meaning of that philosophy. I assume both trains operate simultaneously but (here my question):

a)Should the capacity of the equipments include a overdesign in order serve as backup for the other in case of maintainance? Thus keeping the process continuosly working.

b)Should I consider some adittional equipment to be a backup for both trains?

I thank you in advance for your help.

jeap

RE: Ovelap Backup Design

Speaking of factories in general, and not wastewater plants specifically, of which I know, uh, "used food":

A lot of factories are at risk because of Single Points of Failure, e.g. one major piece of capital equipment through which all work flows.  When that machine is down, you're out of business.

... and your competitor takes up the slack.

;---

It seems that wastewater is different, because it just keeps coming, and there's no competitor there to take up the slack when you go offline, so you can't afford to go offline.

It would therefore make sense to provide some kind of onsite backup.  Logically, each should be sized to at least take care of the full normal flow somehow, to cover the case when one line is down.  Which happens when any one unit is down.

The word 'overlap' suggests a relatively simple enhancement; providing cross- connects, normally closed, so that, e.g. coalescer A could feed flotation unit B, etc., so that the plant could run at full capacity even if two non- corresponding units are down.  You've still got a problem if, e.g., both coalescers are down.



Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Ovelap Backup Design

(OP)
Mike, thanks for your answer. Really useful.

RE: Ovelap Backup Design

This may be a definition for what you described.  We would install two 66% to 75% capacity trains.  Normally each train was partially loaded.  During an upset, one train would run and we could handle 66% to 75% of the load.  With some scheduling for downtime that load would be sufficient.  This arrangement also allows for some off peak times at 130% to 150% of the original design.  It saves on capital if you required 2 - 100% trains.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources