×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

An interesting set of Voltage Measurements
2

An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
I was at a project site on Friday and saw some interesting voltage measurements that I would be interested if anybody could explain.  Now, I know these aren't mathematically possible, but I saw them, other saw them, and they had been reported the day prior, which is why I went to the site; so nobody need respond that there was an error in the readings.

The relevant portion of the system begins with a 480V delta transformer winding.  The three phase from this transformer are fed into some 480V switchgear.  Also connected to the switchgear, but not running (and breakers open) are three generators which can be run parallel to the utility, that's why the delta winding.  Connected to the 480V bus are a set of 277V-120V grounded-wye/grounded-wye VTs (yes, they should be 480V-120V and that will be corrected but that shouldn't matter for this).  The output of the VTs are connected to a CAT/ISO control module, an Eaton Power Meter, and an SEL-351 relay.  The control module has only phases A and C connected plus the neutral of the VTs.  The Eaton Power Meter has the three phase voltages input and has a separate ground connection.  The SEL-351 relay has all three phases and neutral connected.  All three devices have a VT ratio of 2.31 programmed in.  The SEL relay and the Eaton Power Meter report about 281V line to ground/neutral for all three phases as could be expected.  So far, so good.

Now the problem; the CAT/ISO control module reports 148V secondary/342V primary.  OK, that's easy - a bad module.  Well, if only it were that easy.  Two different Fluke DMMs were used to make measurements (I didn't get the model numbers, both had calibration stickers indicating calibration in 2006) and this is where it gets very interesting.  Measuring on the bus of the 480V gear, the Flukes read 485V to 490V across each of the three phase pairs - completely reasonable, and an indication that the meter isn't wildly off.  They also read between 340V and 345V phase to ground.  On the secondary of the VTs, the Fluke meters read 210V to 215V phase to phase and between 145V and 150V phase to neutral.

I had the thought that on this ungrounded system, the Fluke meter was somehow causing a neutral shift, but a couple of tests tend to disprove that.  One test was having both Fluke meters used at the same time, one A to ground and one C to ground, and they both read about 348V.  Another test was measuring the voltages at the terminals on the rear of the SEL relay while watching the metering display on the front of the relay.  With a VT ratio of 2.31 programmed into the relay, and a metering display of 281V phase to neutral (primary), the relay thinks that it has 122V applied to the terminals.  Measuring across the same terminals with the Fluke meter, the fluke read 148V and the metering display on the relay did not change.

Any ideas?  The voltages listed above were all read from the devices indicated by more than one person.  One oscillographic record was trigged and downloaded and it showed that there was between 119° and 121° between phases, so that isn't the cause either.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hello davidbeach
This is an interesting problem, but I've overlooked something in your post I guess and I'm rather confused.  Could you clarify:

The 480V windings are connected delta(three wire) and there are only three phase conductors brought to the switchgear?

There are no earth grounds connected to the delta either at the transformer or the switchgear?

The VT's are nameplate rated 277v/120v and are connected grd Y/grd Y ?

The VT's are simple wound units and not CVT's of any sort?

Thanks

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

David, some ideas:
I summarise that your phase to phase measurements are OK, both on primary and secondary of the VTs, but the phase to gnd measurements are too high on primary and secondary.

This might imply that your star point of the VTs is not at the same potential as gnd.

The two devices that measure phase-n correctly may deduce this from 3 phase measurements, whereas the device that measures the same as the fluke may be measuring phase-n, same as the fluke.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

I'm going to have to sketch this lot out, but as a quick thought: what is the grounding arrangement for the VT secondary? I know you said 'grounded Y' but legacy UK practice frequently grounds the 'Y' phase of the the RYBN (red / yellow / blue / neutral) group. Some electronic instruments really dont like this connection and produce some extremely confusing results. From memory the early GE Multilin PQM II's and the Yokogawa WT series power analysers behave strangely on installations where the star point is not the grounded connection. I have been spotted chasing wild geese for a few fraught hours on a couple of occasions wondering WTF was going on!

----------------------------------
  Sometimes I only open my mouth to swap feet...

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hello David;
My stories may not be relevant but here goes:
Story #1. I sent some students out to the shop to connect some
transformers with the secondaries in wye and verify the voltage ratios between the line to line voltage and the line to neutral voltage.
There was a significant error. We tried with different volt-meters. Still bad readings.
I rolled out a 'scope and looked at wave forms. It was a long time ago and I don't remember which connection had the distortion, but one waveform was distorted. The meters were the old Simpson AVOs. They read average voltage and used the standard form factor to indicate RMS. The distorted wave form had a different form factor.
Story #2. A pump station start-up. The designers may have been a little unsure of themselves and seemed to be ultra conservative.
The station service was grounded wye. Solidly grounded wye.
To the solidly grounded wye they had added an artificial neutral. I am sure that the heat production was beneficial in keeping the switch gear dry in a potentially damp enviroment.
To this was added ground detector lamps.
There were also phase to phase panel voltmeters and phase to neutral panel meters.
The designers tried in vain to locate 480 volt motors for the pumps. The closest that they could come was the industry standard for North America, 460 volt rated motors.
They asked the utility to lower the voltage taps on the transformer bank as low as possible.
Come the start-up. The only day that the tides were suitable during the day fell between Christmas and New Years day. I interrupted my vacation and drove through two mountain passes in a mild storm to be present as the contractors rep.
The designers had a utility crew called out to do a final voltage check before energising.
Now the problem. The phase to phase panel meters did not show the proper ratio between line to line voltage and line to neutral voltage.
They asked the utility crew to check. I checked with two meters. All the meters were d'Arsonval movement meters. All were responding to average rather than RMS.
I remembered the previous experience and gave the assembled engineers a quick tutorial on distorted wave forms and form factors.
Everyone stepped back and let me close the main breaker. As soon as there was some load on the transformer bank, the voltage ratios lined up perfectly.
As a first step, I would see if any io the meters were average reading, and I would consider adding a load (probably some light bulbs) to the vt secondaries.
The wave form was roughly the shape of a positive half-cycle sin wave, but only about 80 degrees duration. There was then about 10 degrees of zero voltage, then the negative half wave, followed by about 10 degrees of zero voltage.
It will be interesting to see if this factor is at play here.
Respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
subtech, ungrounded delta windings.  There is undoubtedly some connection between the switchboard ground and the case ground of the transformer, but only three phase conductors and none of them are grounded.  The name plate of VTs, wound as far as I can tell, are 277V primary, 4/sqrt(3):1 ratio, which works out to 277V:120V.  They were connected grounded-wye/grounded-wye when I arrived and during the testing the primary ground was lifted, but that didn't change anything.

DaveScott, A continuity test was not made between the secondary wye point and switchboard ground, but since direct measurements on the primary of the VTs was showing the same problems as on the secondary, I doubt that was the problem.  If I'd seen different results primary and secondary I'd agree.  As far as I know, the SEL relay only measures voltages between the phase terminals and the N terminal; it won't provide voltage readings in open delta applications unless the grounded B phase conductor is connected to both the B terminal and the N terminal.

ScottyUK, Brand new installation, grounded wye at the wye-point, not at the the B phase.  Because it is a system that can operate ungrounded, the VTs should probably have been grounded on B instead of the wye-point, but they weren't; another sign that the people who put it together don't do much with ungrounded systems

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
waross, interesting; we were apparently posting at the same time.  The oscillographic record downloaded showed nice clean voltage waveforms, but it was filtered data.  I'll see if it is possible to get a raw data record of the same event.

Some people have tried to brush it off by saying that the voltages will get to where they are supposed to be once there is some load, but the only way to get load is for the voltages to be close enough to where they should be to allow the generators to sync to the bus - so far it was just the transformer with no load.  Actually that's not quite true, and I may have just thought of something.  A bit bigger picture - on the high side, there is one 12.47kV feed that feeds two 2.5MVA transformers paralleled to the bus each through their own breaker.  Also on the bus are three 1.5MW generators.  The connection to the transformers is there to allow the generators to back feed the utility and those breakers are interlocked with other "load" breakers that serve transfer switches to supply power to hospital loads on loss of utility.  Transformers or transfer switches, but never both at the same time.  I wonder if circulating currents between the two transformers could have been causing problems some how - but I don't really know how they could.

Also, for what it's worth, my visit to the installation on Friday was my first involvement with this, I have no vested interest in any outcome other than eventually understanding what is going on.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hi David.
My first guess would be that the anomaly is being developed by the wye connected CT's, not the delta connected power transformer.
I suspect the VT's
Both my experiences have been with wye connections. Not much you can do to load the power transformer, but you may be able to load the VT's with light bulbs for a test.
respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

David,
I have been working on the exact same problem at our refinery.

Our readings were normal phase to phase (480v) and around 140 L-n, 200 L-n and 400 L-N.

We thought at first we had a transformer problem. So we took the transformer offline and perfromed a megger test and turn to turn ratio tests all off which passed.

The next step was verifying the ground grid at this substation. Since it is located in our tank farm it was not directly connected to our overall ground grid. To make a long story short, we drove 3 ground rods at each of the 4 corners of the sub and this changed our voltage readings to about 250 L-n, 280 L-N, and 340 L-N.

The next step is to investiggate the individual VT's that create the ground detection system. If the Z is not close on all of them, it may throw off the system balance.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
arcflash99, I can see your measurements as within the realm of possibility; I have tried to work out the math to figure out where the neutral might be, but you have an offset neutral.  In this case where a balanced system should produce about 280V line-to-neutral primary, we were seeing 348V line-to-neutral primary on all three phases, what one would expect from a 600V system, not a 480V system.  An offset neutral wouldn't concern me as long as the voltages (and phase angles) would produce the phase-to-phase voltages.  The only way to make the math work on this set of readings would be if the neutral point were not on the same plane as the three corners of the phase-to-phase voltage triangle; and that doesn't make sense.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

waross--

Two thoughts:

1.  Have you tried these measurements with a low-impedance meter, like an old Simpson or something.  High impedance meters such as Flukes are notorious for giving strange readings on ungrounded systems.

2.  I'm really interested in voltages and phase angles in this situation.

old field guy

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

davidbeach
Given your statement about the 12.47 KV feed to this transformer, I'd go back and take a serious look at the grounding grid between the switchgear containing the
VT's in question and the incoming wye feeder.  It seems to me that there are many workers who don't understand the importance of good neutral bonding in general and grounding grids as well.  I've worked in many substations where I found the grounding grid cut to pieces during previous projects and never put  back together.
The more this is discussed, it smells like the same open ground grid problems I've seen before.  I'm sure it's completely possible I'm missing something else here, but I'd sure check out the grid integrity first if I could get to it.
By the way, there are no resistors or reactors in the upstream transfomer neutrals are there?  I once saw a rather large transfomer on a utility that employed a neutral reactor that got virtually eliminated from service by one misplaced 4/0 copper jumper on the transformer tank near the X0 bushing............

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

David, I'm trying to understand more clearly:
//...One test was having both Fluke meters used at the same time, one A to ground and one C to ground, and they both read about 348V....
...They were connected grounded-wye/grounded-wye when I arrived and during the testing the primary ground was lifted, but that didn't change anything...
...A continuity test was not made between the secondary wye point and switchboard ground, but since direct measurements on the primary of the VTs was showing the same problems as on the secondary, I doubt that was the problem...//

You were measuring from VT connection to ground, and got some strange readings. When you disconnected the ground (where?), it didn't make any difference. It is not known if there was continuity between VT star point and ground.

If the primary and secondary VT star points were commoned and not grounded properly, but you measured from VT to ground, then this could be one possible problem, since you are measuring the voltage across the VT plus the additional impedance to earth.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hi David:
I've been thinking about this all day. Then it hit me. As I understand the connections, your VTs have a floating primary neutral on a wye/wye connection. With a delta transformer winding, connection of the wye point to ground is immaterial because there is no system neutral connected to ground.
If the VTs were delta connected on the secondary, the delta would force proper phase angles of the primary voltages and this in turn would result in the expected voltages on the secondarys.
With a floating wye primary/wye secondary, the voltages on the secondaries are inversly dependant on the loads on the secondaries.
With no load on the transformers, the secondary voltages will be dependant on the exciting currents of the VT primaries.
The current in each primary will be dependant on the impedances of the three primary windings. Hysteresis will render these impedances non linear.
Rather than a neutral point out of the plane of the other voltages, think of it as a rotating neutral point.
As the voltage in "A" phase reaches a peak, the impedances of one or both of the other VTs become proportionatly less than the impedance of the "A" phase VT. The neutral point shifts away from "A" and the resultant voltage is higher.
There will be the same effect as each phase peaks. The neutral point becomes a rotating vector and revolves around the geometric neutral point.
Proof of concept:
Look for some resistors suitable for 480 volt service.
Connect them in wye to the delta transformer winding.
Measure the voltage from the VT wye point to the resistor wye point.
Connect the resistor wye point to the VT wye point. That is, use the resistors to generate a true neutral point. I anticipate that the VT secondary voltages will be corrected.
With time limitations, I would use resistors which draw several times the exciting current of the VTs.
If you have the luxury of a lot of time and resistors, it may be interesting to vary the resistors ratings so that the resistor current ranges from about 10% of the exciting current to several times the exciting current.
Comments are welcome
Respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Ah, yes. I think you are right. I just checked what we do with electric arc furnaces (floating delta), and there is a set of 0.1uF capacitors, with fuse protection, which are in star connection to provide the metering phase-gnd measurement.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
waross, an LPS for you, I think you may have solved it, thanks.  I don't know if the testing you suggest will be able to take place or not.  When the 277V VTs are replaced with 480V VTs, it sounds like they will also be connected in open delta (not my preference, but again it's not my project).

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

David,
I don't understand how I can have an offset neutral with a delta secondary.

If it is offset, how does one correct it?

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
arcflash99, The offset neutral is just where the leakages and stray capacitances have put it.  I'm not sure you can correct it without causing your system to become grounded.  It's not really a problem for the electrical system, just a bit annoying for your phase-to-ground voltages.  In a delta system, the only real meaning that can be attached to phase-to-ground voltages is for the calculation of zero-sequence voltages, everything else should be based on phase-to-phase voltages.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

The phase to ground problems is what started our investigation into the phase to ground unbalances. All motors, MOVs, and other 3 phase loads have been working just fine.

Thanks for the info

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

David,
What waross says makes a lot of sense if the PT neutral is floating. I thought I understood you to say the neutral was originally grounded and now is not. Can you access the floating PT neutral and measure the voltage to ground?

Another item that might cause rotation of the neutral would be if the PT's are wye-ground on primary and saturating (you said they are 277V).

Also, I recently read an article that described a problem with wye-ground PT's on ungrounded systems causing ferroresonance.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

There is a misunderstanding regarding the terms grounded and neutral.
The power transformer secondary is delta. There is no neutral.
The VTs are connected in wye. The star point is grounded but the system (power transformer secondary) has no neutral and no ground.
If one phase of the power transformer secondary were to go to ground the voltage on the VT on the grounded phase would be zero. the voltage on the other VTs would rise to phase voltage.
Although the star point is grounded it is a floating neutral as far as the ungrounded system (power transformer) is concerned.
Respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

waross,
I understand all that. David said [the PT's] "were connected grounded-wye/grounded-wye when I arrived and during the testing the primary ground was lifted, but that didn't change anything."

My thought was that your last analysis made sense only for the condition where the PT 'start point' is not grounded. Maybe it also is true with the PT's grounded. I'll have to think about that.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hi  alehman;
Grounding the VTs will not make any difference unless the system neutral is grounded. The system is delta and there is no neutral to ground.
In this case grounding the VT wye point is for safety only. There is not return path to the transformer delta winding and so the ground connection does not make any difference to the voltages. It references the VT voltages to ground but it doesn't affect the VT voltages.
respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
It now makes perfect sense that lifting the ground on the VT primary wye-point would have no effect.  When the only ground reference in the system is the VT primary wye-point, it can't tie anything down, particularly if the transformers are going in and out of saturation.  Lifting that connection didn't do anything because the connection wasn't doing anything in the first place.

waross, semantics perhaps, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that there is no neutral with respect to the power transformer.  There is certainly no physical manifestation of the neutral, but the mathematical concepts still apply and a system neutral exists; that point where the potential to the phase voltages is minimized.

arcflash99, I should correct some of my terminology, it is really an offset ground that you have, not an offset neutral.  In an ungrounded system, ground can exist anywhere, usually within the phase triangle, but not always (yours is).  Neutral is where ground would be if all the couplings to ground were perfectly balanced.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hi David;
[quote[There is certainly no physical manifestation of the neutral[/quote]
That's what I was trying to say.
I suspect that hysteresis rather than saturation is the culprit. If the instrument connected to the VTs has non linear loading characteristics it may also be a factor.
Respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Just a thought:

Why ground the primary side star point of VT? Specially when the primary side is ungrounded delta. Does this not effectively 'try' to act as a grounding transformer?

What happens if you  "unground" the primary star point of the VTs?

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Hi Rafiq;
(I hope that's right)
With the VT primarys grounded, you have a very high impedance grounded system. The impedance being the impedance of the VTs.  
A load will cause the impedance to drop but even with a load, I think the impedance may be beyong the normal range of grounding impedances.
With no faults on the system there will be no return path and no circuit for the ground connection back to the power transformer.
David states in his {17 Dec 06 14:01} post that the ground connection was removed with no result.
See also the first paragraph of David's "19 Dec 06 1:30" post.
Respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Keep in mind that system capacitances mean you always have a high impedance grounded system, with or without the PT neutral being connected. It's not unusual to see a few amps of ground fault current in an 'ungrounded' system. Whether the capacitive charging current is comparable to the PT magnetization current is questionable. Balance of the capacitances is unknown but should be somewhere close. If the system 'neutral' tends to be offset substantially from ground, saturation of the PT's may come in to play if their neutral point is grounded. It's good practice to sense only line-to-line voltage on 'ungrounded' systems.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

waross:

Yes, Rafiq is right. I find all comments interesting, but
I just think that, its best left ungroudned on an ungrounded system. Plus just an observation, use of two VTs connected in broken delta is more common for voltage sensing and even for metering.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year all.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

(OP)
Open delta, not broken delta.  Broken delta is three windings in delta with one corner not connected so that the sum of the three voltages can be measured, used to determine 3V0.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Thanks david.

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

This is a little off topic but it may be of interest to those of you who are familiar with broken delta connections with metering transformers. This was a little bigger scale.
I was called into a glass bottle factory years ago.
They used a very large transformer to boost the heat in the glass furnace. (Yes, molten glass conducts electricity and electric resistance heating is often used for either primary heat, or supplementary heat in the glass melting furnace.)
They temperature of the transformer was disproportionately high for the load. The transformer was wye/delta with circulating currents. There were 4 electrodes connected to each phase.
We removed the jumper bus that connected "A" phase winding to "B" phase winding. We left two electrodes connected to the finish of "A" phase and two electrodes connected to the start of "B" phase. The circulating currents then circulated in the glass melt doing useful work and the transformer temperature dropped dramatically.
Respectfully

RE: An interesting set of Voltage Measurements

Could it be just a setting on the Iso cpntrol module?
Do you have a link to the manual on the thing?
If it thought it was looking at a 600 Volt system it would behave just like it is.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources