×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flatness relative to part thickness?

Flatness relative to part thickness?

Flatness relative to part thickness?

(OP)
I have a composite structure or panel that is somewhat large in size.  Design engineering is trying to control the bow or warp of these parts with a flatness callout.  How can I use a CMM to measure the flatness or warp of the part with respect to a surface plate?  If I take points on top of the part then my numbers are dependent of the part thickness tolerance at each point location.  How do I take measurements to control flatness and take into account the part thickness tolerance?

|)|

Joejack7

RE: Flatness relative to part thickness?

Joe:

Flatness does not reference anything but itself.

There are a couple of ways to perform flatness on a CMM and I will give you the better way.

Take 3 points on the surface that are 120 degrees apart and close to the edge. Create a plane. Hopefully your software will do this. Now take at least 24 points one the surface usually in a circular motion from the outside of the surface towards the centre of the surface relative to the plane that you just created.

The software should give you the actual flatness which is the FIM or TIR of all your readings.

Hope this helps.

 

Dave D.
www.qmsi.ca

RE: Flatness relative to part thickness?

As Dave says, there's a number of different ways to inspect flatness on a CMM.  If you can visually see highs & lows, probing those areas alone is useful as it is a max to min height difference that you are looking for.  When you can't find the highs & lows visually, another option is to do a mapping of the surface by tracing (hard on the equipment and some errors that accumulate) or by point sampling in a pre-defined X-Y pattern where each subsequent row is offset from the previous row to miimize the risk of missing a transition.  I've had to do this to verify / counter supplier claims, and it yielded amazingly graphical results.  The software should be able to generate the plane of the surface and provide the flatness for you.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services
CAD-Documentation-GD&T-Product Development
www.profileservices.ca

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources