×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shear Flow with y' = 0?

Shear Flow with y' = 0?

Shear Flow with y' = 0?

(OP)
I am having a bit of a problem with a shear flow problem.  I have a WF with strong axis bending (and some torsion) that is getting a vertical plate welded to (1) side of it.
This plate is to take out the torsion.  When I am calculating the shear flow, the A' is the Area of the plate, but y' is the distance from the centroid of the composite section to the centroid of the connected piece (plate).  In this case the centroidal axes are coincident, and y' = 0.  This is obviously problematic because I can not calc shear flow with this.  I have considered calcing the shear flow at the juncture of the web/flange and distributing it based on relative thickness between the flange and plate; this is not at the EXACT juncture that I am seeking, but I feel it is close enough since the weld will most likely be overdesigned by a significant factor.
Does anyone have any suggestions.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

not sure I understood yr problem correctly - are you welding a plate to side of web, thickening the web?

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

(OP)
No, I am welding the plate to the edges of the flanges in an effort to simulate an HSS section.  

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

See this thread  thread507-168270  which had a similiar situation.  See my response mid-way down - I believe this same type thought process would work for this problem.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

(OP)
Willis- Will that work?  It appears to me that the w you are calculating is a vertical line load that will produce the required deflection.  I agree with that.  How does that vertical line load of w get transferred into a horizontal shear flow resisted by the bolts (in the case of thread you referenced)?  If, for example, the w turned out to be 9.3 kips/ft - would you say (1) - 3/4" A325N bolt/12" is ok?  

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

Yes.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

MYerges

I think your approach is correct.

If you think of this as welding the flange to the plate and the web, instead of the plate to the flange, then your weld will take a portion of the total shear flow. The question is, what portion?  Distributing it based on the relative thickness of the plate and the flange makes sense to me.  After all, if the web and plate deflect the same, then the shear in each will be proportional to the relative thickness, as opposed to the relative size of the welds.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

jmiec..I'm not so sure on that - if you are looking at deformation compatibility the load in each will be proportional to the moment of inertia of the plate vs. that beam - not the areas of plate to flange.  

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

WillisV

Oops, I meant to say the distribution should be based on the relative thickness of the web and the additional plate.  That would make the shear flow proportional to the thickness of the plate vs. that of the web of the beam.

Here's how I got to that conclusion.  Imagine that the section is made up of four plates, two flanges and two webs. Now weld the flanges to the web plate, and to the other plate.  All the welds will have shear flow, proportional to the thickess,(and moment of inertia) of the vertical plates.  

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

WillisV

I don't believe the thinking that went into your response to thread507-168270 applies to this case.  The compatible deformation reasoning only applies to the case when the connectors are located at the neutral axis.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

MYerges:  I assume your I-beam y axis is vertical, with bending about the x axis, so your statement y' = 0 doesn't seem to make sense. The section cut for shear flow is generally on (or close to) only one plane, not two different planes. So there's no way to completely section off a free body of your attached plate and, at the same time, have a meaningful y' value.

Instead, your section cut would be, e.g., near the inner face of your I-beam flange, cutting the web and your attached plate (or weld) simultaneously. So A' would basically be the cross-sectional area of one flange, not of the attached plate. Then, the shear stress can be roughly assumed to be evenly distributed across this section cut, meaning it is distributed approximately in proportion to the web and attached plate thicknesses.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

(OP)
Vonlueke -
I said in my original post that my idea was to do basically what you suggested.  I am not sure you are understanding the problem correctly if you think that y'=0 doesn't make sense.  I have a WF oriented vertically (like a normal beam) with an eccentric pt. load causing strong axis bending and torsion.  The plate is being welded to one side only at the top and bottom flanges.  The plate is sized 1/2" larger than the depth of the beam to allow for the weld at the top of the top flange and bottom of the bottom flange to the plate.
This being the case, when you determine the plane on which you want to calc the shear flow, the orientation of that plane to the strong or weak axis is irrelevant.  I initially tried to make the plane a vertical plane cutting both of the weld locations to get an accurate shear flow.  When you do that, however, the centroidal axis of the connected part (plate) and the centroidal axis of the composite section (WF w/plate) have a separation of zero (0).  I then decided to do the approximation, which pretty much amounts to what you described.  I was just trying to find out if anyone else had a different suggestion that might yield more accurate results.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

MYerges

I believe vonlueke and I are thinking alike.  Let me try to explain this again, without the typos.  You need to think of the flange as the "connected part", not the vertical plate. Then, in the shear flow equation, A' becomes the area of the flange, and y' becomes the vertical distance from the horizontal neutral axis to the weld.

The calculated  shear flow is distrubuted to the two vertical elements, the web of the beam and the vertical plate, in proportion to their thickness.  

That the weld is not in the same plane as the web fillet muddies up the solution some.  Could you fit the plate between the flanges?

I'm not sure how the antisymmetry of the composite member effects the distribution, but I believe it would be conservative to ignore it in the design of the weld.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

MYerges, your problem is pretty complicated.  Go open your mechanics of material text book and look for "shear center".  Your calc will be 10X easier if you put the plates on both sides so you can assume the welds on both sides will take the same amount of shear and the shear center will be the center of gravitiy.

RE: Shear Flow with y' = 0?

MYerges:  Thanks for the clarification. I agree with you and jmiec that your second method, jmiec's posts, and my post all describe the same approach.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources