×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lower control arm position

Lower control arm position

Lower control arm position

(OP)
I'm furiously reading Staniforth et al and have a specific question I can't find explained.
All the examples for unequal A frames I see, set the lower arm position as horizontal at neutral bump/droop when viewed from the front. I've search photos from F1 etc. and always see the lower arm level with the ground.
For a road car would this always be the best position, or are there instances of an inclined lower arm, at normal ride height, being a better compromise?
Thanks, Colin.

RE: Lower control arm position

Apparently it's part of a better compromise in the independent rear suspensions found on SUVs.  Lower links are clearly at an upward angle toward the diff in all the ones I remember seeing.  I'm guessing that the back seat / third seat ride quality for most "normal" driving is better that way than with a lower geometric roll center and stiffer rear suspension tuning.


Norm

RE: Lower control arm position


Most serious off-road race trucks and buggies are also kept at or very close to level. For one thing, it's probably the only way you can go camber/straight/camber. It also provides lower overall suspension scrub and steering bias.  

RE: Lower control arm position

Maybe I should have typed 'roadgoing SUVs", as all of my observations have been made while stuck behind one or the other of those things in traffic.  Since under those conditions I can't see much else that I'm generally and intentionally headed toward, I might as well let my curiosity make the most of it.  Where I live, most SUVs go no further off road than a gravel driveway.  Intentionally, anyway.  [/mild rant]  

RE: Lower control arm position

The enagle of the lower arm at 'design' has a dominant effect on how neutral the toe and camber curves are. You can certainly design suspensions around various levels of droop at design - some high ground clearance designs do exactly this.


However, it makes the vehicle very sensitive to jacking - if you apply a lateral force at the CP then the inner end of the arm will be pushed up. Not good.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Lower control arm position

(OP)
Ok thanks. My thoughts were that only bump, as on the loaded side in a corner, really matters. The droop side I assumed did so little work that it didn't matter.
My readings so far seem to teach that it is the top arm length that controls negative camber gain through roll and so I wondered if the level neutral position for the lower arm really mattered that much.  

RE: Lower control arm position

I usually start of calculating with the lower A-arm parallel to ground. However, depending on CGH, downforce,
A-arm lenght, wheel travel lenght and a number of other
things, I may compromice using different cambercompensation curves, static camber settings and end up with a non-parallell to ground lower A-arm.
What I am trying to say is that it is a question related to circumstances.
Goran Malmberg

RE: Lower control arm position

(OP)
Thanks for the replies. Colin.

RE: Lower control arm position

F1 cars now days have the lower arm cranked up on he inside...nothing to do with roll centres/bump steer/camber gain. its to get it out of the way of the air from the front wing!!! their suspemsion travels less than 2 inches so F1 isnt a good role model for kinematic design. its all about the aero

RE: Lower control arm position

The relative angle betweeen the upper and lower control arm controls the slope of the camber curve.  The relative length of the upper to lower control arm controls the curviture of the camber curve.

You can have no change in camber with parallel, but not horizontal, upper and lower control arms of equal length.

It is difficult to evaluate the angle of only one control arm and learn much, however most of the production cars I have worked on ended up with the LCA going up as it went inboard.

-Joe

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources