×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Integral End Bents Analysis and Design

Integral End Bents Analysis and Design

Integral End Bents Analysis and Design

(OP)
Does anybody could share the methodology for IEB's analysis and design? How LL is applied? Is it designed as a continuous beam? What is effective d? Thanks.

Note: IEB's subject to vertical loads only

RE: Integral End Bents Analysis and Design

IEB are designed very conservatively by some and by others not so conservatively.  

Most designs that I've seen only assume the bearing beam to provide the real structural capacity and the diaphragm to be just another load but no additional structural capacity.  Most beams are designed using 4-#6s or even 4-#8 but rarely anything more.  In many cases, the beams are generally about 3.5' deep and 2.5-3.0' in width.  

For live load, the maximum number of axles are placed based on lane configuration and any live load reduction applied based on multiple lanes.  The rear axle is always assumed to be on the centerline bearing and you must include the reactions of the other axles in the span.

To determine the number of pile there is no need to distribute the load to the girders, just use the total load.  However, for the beam flexure most designs will assume simple shear distribution to the girders.  With the diaphragm in place this isn't exact behavior but it represents one simple and conservative way.  The other is to simply total the live load and make a uniform load of it.

I doubt you don't have any lateral loads, you're just making a simplifying assumption which is typical.  Otherwise you can have both longitudinal and transverse loading for IEB.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Integral End Bents Analysis and Design

As Q-Shake said design methodology varies. Refer to you state DOT for guidance.

The MassHighway bridge design manual has some good guidence on the design and detailing of integral abutments . Try this link:

http://www.mhd.state.ma.us/default.asp?pgid=content/bridgeman_new02&;sid=about

Remember to consider the bridge skew, horizontal alignment(curvature), and roadway grade when designing integral abutments.

It is important the abutments are not too stiff. To ensure that expansion at the bridge ends can occur design the foundation piles to allow for more deflection than normal (h-piles aligned along the weak axis).  Stiffness is also a consideration when designing for seismic/ dynamic loading.
Semi integral abutments can eliminate the need for the more flexible foundations since the beams are supported on expansion bearings, but stiffness is still a consideration and the back wall cannot be so large that the soil pressure does not allow the bridge to expand.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources