×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Large fill alternatives

Large fill alternatives

Large fill alternatives

(OP)
What products are there that can be be used as fill for a large railroad project?  The fills are as much as 30'. The soils are not good. The client needs to do this during the wet season. We are utilizing cement soil treatment, but it is proving to be expensive.

RE: Large fill alternatives

What is not good about the soils that are available for borrow?  Almost any soil with low organics can be made into a structural fill.

RE: Large fill alternatives

(OP)
The soil is mostly silt. the original geotech report was concerned that there would be significant settlement and shifting.  another report says that the soil can be used for fill.  I put the soil info in the question as FYI. If someone knows of something, but it requires strong soils to begin with, this is probably not a solution.

RE: Large fill alternatives

Silt in a structural fill can be "strong soil".  A specification of placing in 6" level lifts at 1% over optimum moisture with compactive effort to achieve 92-95% of a modified proctor will give a good fill with usable values of the magnitude you need.

RE: Large fill alternatives

The key here is wet season construction.

Lime is often used to aid the drying process. Usually 2 to 3 percent. With a fill height of 30 ft - not sure what the fill slopes are-, on ehas to be concerned about slope sloughs. On can try intermediate layers of gravel to aid in pore water presure dissipation of the fill is wet and no use of additives are required . Availability of granular material and cost comes in the picture as well. However,you noted that use of strong soils is not a solution.

The use of 6 inch fills while specified is hardly ever done or realistic. Try at least 500 mm lifts. The use of vibratory compactors and with hauling equipment, 95% Standard Proctor is readily achieveable these days. Getting closer to the top of the fill below the subballast, one my want to use non-woven fabric and better material for the top say 0.5m.

The above are not cast in stone and much depends on the nature of the fill. The term silt can also be a soil which has gravel sizes but has more silt sizes. It is often difficult without a gradation or look at the material, hence you are the judge. Look at the Proctor curve for moisture sensitivity of the material.     

RE: Large fill alternatives

(OP)
Specs read 6'lifts
The client has on site borrow area
The cost is being driven up by using lime or cement used for soil stabilization because, of the time of year this work is going to happen.  
I had hoped to investigate a product that could be placed while not being concerned with the rain.  If the cost of the fill plus the cost of soil treatment was the same or more than placing another product, the client might consider it, just to make the schedule.

RE: Large fill alternatives

Low weight foam block fills have been used to minimize consolidation/settlement of fills of great depth.  Railroad loading is probably greater than highway loading so direct application needs analysis of the differences.  Cost is quite low compared with imported fill, (not competitive with on-site borrow).

RE: Large fill alternatives

(OP)
Civilperson

Do you know where to look for a productline, a company a ....? I emailed the styrofoam industry and have not heard back. i even emailed the tire recycle assoc. i would like to come up with an alternative that is not so weather dependent.

RE: Large fill alternatives

"Specs read 6' lifts"  - I presume you mean 6" lifts...

You are concerned with the substrate and not the fill material itself I would guess though.  What, specifically, do the insitu materials show?  

You can excavate and embed the foam material (some types are poured in place) for a completely neutral embankment.

RE: Large fill alternatives

(OP)
yes that was a typo it should have been 6"

i'm not really concerned with the material just the cost of the fill and placing the fill.  i offered as a solution, not do the work for 3 months and pay the contractor accel. thinking that it might actually save money.  That was not thought of highly.  so then i figured find something that can be worked during the winter months, that would not be impacted as much by rain.

RE: Large fill alternatives

You should probably consider traditional granular fill.  If it is relatively clean sand, then it won't be nearly as difficult to use as the on-site silts.

If you want to investigate styrofoam backfill, check out this link:

http://www.geosynthetic-institute.org/products/gf.htm

However, the stuff is relatively expensive compared to traditional fill.

RE: Large fill alternatives

Fifteen states have used "geofoam" fills including the Big Dig in Boston and I-15 in Utah.  Two brands are Beaver Plastics, ("GeoFoam"), and FalconFoam, ("Geofoam").  In 24 inch thick blocks the volume cost is competitive with imported aggregates.

RE: Large fill alternatives

I wouldn't recommend something based on the Big Dig experience - especially in terms of cost effectiveness...

RE: Large fill alternatives

LCruiser
Steel and concrete were both used in the Big Dig and I bet you are still using both materials in your designs.

RE: Large fill alternatives

I'd consider placing the on-site soils and after reaching design grades, installing settlement plates to monitor for post-construction settlement.  

f-d

¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

RE: Large fill alternatives

A small company called MineSeal, LLC mfgs and installs a polyurethane foam sealant to close hazardous mine openings and construction cavities. Their product is not in foam blocks, but rather, the material comes in portable boxes (1 cu yd) or in bulk (buckets & barrels). I know their material has been used by construction and mining companies & government agencies. The boxed materials are mixed manually in the field and the bulk material is applied mechanically. They have a website: www.mine-seal.com

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources