Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

Is there any specification for corrosion allowance for stainless steel? I think we don't need to give stainless steel corrosion allowance. Am I right?

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

Corrosion allowance is an application-specific judgment call.  If you're using stainless steel in a situation where carbon steel would probably serve for 30 years with a 1/8" corrosion allowance, you may be able to get away with a zero corrosion allowance on stainless steel in that service- or not- depending on the specific details of the service!  If you're using the stainless steel in a situation where it will be subject to corrosion, you do need to spec a corrosion allowance on it.  

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

We have also had a case in which no CA was specified for the stainless steel, but it turned out in operation that there is pitting attack due to chloride salts. The lifetime of the equipment is limited to 12 years by this corrosion.

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

There is no sense in a CA if the attack will be pitting or crevice corrosion.  Added thickness when the failure is localized will not significantly extend service.  But it will raise the cost a lot.
I doubt that there is any environment that took 12 years to pit stainless.  My guess is that it worked fine for 11.75 years and then there was a process upset or chemistry change and the system failed in three months.

If you are in a chemically reducing environment and may see general corrosion, then yes a CA can be used.

In general, you select a stainless or Ni alloy grade with near zero corrosion in you situation and then you do not use a CA.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

Ed, so what you are saying is that there is no "slow" pitting of stainless steel, but when there is pitting, it proceeds at a rapid rate?

The equipment I am talking about is the shell of a stainless steel reboiler on a condensate stabiliser on an oil field. Pitting corrosion was found upon an internal inspection after 7 years of operation (this was the first internal inspection). The pits were 2 mm deep. The postulated mechanism is that corrosive species including mineral salts concentrate themselves in the reboiler liquid circuit (the heavy ends in the circuit essentially circulate in a closed loop) and that these species cause the pitting. This is only a postulate still without proof. Based on the 2 mm pitting in 7 years, the expected lifetime was projected. Is this approach wrong?

Do you know of any method to detect active pitting non-intrusively? The reboiler surface is too hot for manual UT (187°C). Have acoustic emmision methods been used for such applications?

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

In general, corrosion resistance alloys (i.e. stainless steels, Ni alloys, etc.) do not require the corrosion allowance because they are usually selected under no-expected corrosion rate, less than 1 mpy.  However sometimes they may be exposed to not only pitting due to crevice corrosion or upset condition (i.e. once or twice a year with a short time and/or some corrosive trace elements) but also erosion due to some particles or severe turbulent flow.
In these cases, most users are applying some corrosion allowance for CRA, such as 1/16~1/8” (or 0.05~0.10mm) CA.

Thomas Eun

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

GL, My experience is that pitting is fairly rapid.  I would suggest that your situation may be that you only have the local conditions to drive the pitting during some portion of your operation.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?

I have been reading your request.In our tests we took sulfuric acid to the boiling point with 316 and 316L.We lost 10.053 grams in 6 hours at 40% sulfuric.We have also surpassed 1000 degree F.I am new here so I am not sure if I am allowed to tell you the product we are using.We are NOT looking to sell anything,but would do a test for you at no charge.We are working in the Alberta oil patch and understand your situation.Please let me know if I can release the info.

Jeffrey C

RE: corrosion allowance for stainless steel?


Corrosion allowances for carbon steels are given by the project based on service conditions and expectable uniform corrosion rates.

For stainless steel designers follow the same criteria.

Some specify 0 mm, others 1mm and others 1.6mm.

See the thread338-159732 with some opinions on this subject



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close