×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

metric scaling issues

metric scaling issues

metric scaling issues

(OP)
Hi there. i am new to Nastran, and i am importing large assemblies from Pro/E, using iges format (the parasolid woudl not import), and i have been successful creating meshes, applying contact surfs, etc. i would like to be working in mm\N\s\Kg (metric). i am using 72e9 for E of AL7005. my stress result look somewhat as expected, though my displacements are way too small, in the 1e-6 range. i understnad that Nastran does not understand units, but can someone point me in the direction of getting my disp's as expected. So i'm assuming that it is a scaling issue, but where do i change it - is it Solid geometry scale factor, in the prefs menu?

oh yeah, i made a 100unit(mm?) long bar, with the same mat prop as above, and applied a 1000N force to the end of the bar, and my disps were still 1e-5mm.

thanks for your help.

RE: metric scaling issues

darcyo

You are using the SI value (Newtons per square metre) of Aluminium, in your chosen metric system it is 72000 Newtons per square millimetre. A factor of million out!

RE: metric scaling issues

With nastran, units consistency is the major pitfall of ALL beginners.
In all calcualtions, write down the units used for input - be careful with density when doing modal analysis, E and G in general properties, and note the units of force/pressure used.
If you are doing vibration analysis (MSC.RANDOM) check ALL your units, or you might get obscene results.

If your units are consistent, you can begin searching for structural model problems using the results, but if the units are garblesd then you can't draw any conclusions from the model.

RE: metric scaling issues

(OP)
thanks guys. so Nastran then uses Standard International (S.I.) and standard Imperial units then? because, SI units are N m s, not N mm s.. guess that is because 1MPa is 1N/mm^2...

so is there a reference page that either of you know of with Nastran's system of units?

much appreciated,
darcyo

RE: metric scaling issues

nastran has no units.
you can do lb/mm^2 if you want...
thats the pitfall.

RE: metric scaling issues

Darcyo,

As JakeLiv says Nastran in common with ALL FE software that I know of is unitless. It is 100% the responsibility of the user to be working in a consistent set of units. However dynamics software like MSC/Adams allows the user to choose from a list of consistent set of units.

RE: metric scaling issues

The key is to use consistent unit, for metric units, adopt mm, N, s, Mg (yes thats megagrams), you will get out N, mm, MPA (N/mm^2) and masses in Mg.  This becomes particularly relevant if you are using an impact code with constraint staht include velocity (mm/s) or accelerations (mm/s/), so 1g (gravity) is 9810 (mm/s/s).  Now all you have to do is sort out the signs.
Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources