×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Masonry Control Joints

Masonry Control Joints

Masonry Control Joints

(OP)
A very popular wall system thru much of Florida is the use of continuous cast in place concrete "tie" beams typically 8"x16" instead of masonry bond beams at the tops of 8" masonry walls.  From my experience in other areas of the country I try to encourage the use of full height control joints thru the wall and "tie" beam at typically 20' on center.  And as a result I often get the usual "I've never done that" or "that's not done here" response from both architects and contractors.

After some research I beginning to have a change of heart since the "tie" beam is effectively restraining movement similar to the foundation.  Does this sound reasonable or should I not be giving in?

RE: Masonry Control Joints

I'm in Florida.  We stop joints at tie beams also.  

RE: Masonry Control Joints

The tie beam at the top of a CMU wall should NOT have a joint through it, because many times it acts as a diaphragm chord.

DaveAtkins

RE: Masonry Control Joints

I'm confused.  If you have tie beams, don't you have cast-in-place concrete "tie columns" every 16 ft?  What do you need control joints for?

RE: Masonry Control Joints

I agree that most often I have seen the engineer detail the joint so that it stops below the tie beam. As Dave Atkins says: the tie beam is used as the diaphragm chord.

If provisions are made for some other element to act as the diaphragm chord, then go ahead and run the joint thru the tie beam. Either method should work, if designed properly.

RE: Masonry Control Joints

If the joint stops just below the tie beam what good does it do? Doesn't the bond between the beam and the masonry just below it keep the control joint from opening up as designed?

I think we routinely put in too many control joints, and as a structural engineers we want the longest most continuous length of wall we can get!

RE: Masonry Control Joints

JLNJ,

You are correct--a continuous bond beam will prevent the top of a control joint from opening properly.  But if the bond beam needs to be continuous for structural reasons, then I think that supercedes the need for a "perfect" control joint.  And as you get further below the bond beam, the control joint should open properly.

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources