Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
(OP)
I have a heat sink that i want to insert two cartridge type heaters. Unfortunately the heat sink profiles i have found that fit my assembly do not leave much surrounding material if i drill it out for the cartridge heaters.
I have to drill a 1/8" hole about 1.5" to 2" deep. The surrounding thickness will be about 3/64". My question is, How much should i expect the drill bit to wander?
Is there a rule of thumb that says X diameters deep is the maximum depth with accuracy? My supervisor suggested 3 diameters but that seems very minute.
I have to drill a 1/8" hole about 1.5" to 2" deep. The surrounding thickness will be about 3/64". My question is, How much should i expect the drill bit to wander?
Is there a rule of thumb that says X diameters deep is the maximum depth with accuracy? My supervisor suggested 3 diameters but that seems very minute.





RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
Depends on quite a few things, amongst others the material and process used.
Let's assume it is aluminium, your machine is in good condition and set up properly, you don't feed too fast, you first drill a smaller pilot hole, you might then use an end mill to square the hole up for say 3 diameters deep, and then drill the final hole. This done, your center line might be off 0.1-0.2mm which is adequate!
But, it's not to say it's aluminium and may be you you want to use a simpler process...
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
EDM is slow.
Regarding a 2.4mm pilot hole: in my opinion it does not have to go all the way..., just slightly deeper than the guide distance the end mill has to go.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
There are a few factors which influence the quality of work.
a) the relative movement of work and drill, for deep drilling, it's easier to produce concentric holes when the work is revolving, with the drill held stationary.
b) starting the hole, use a center drill prior to the deep drilling.
c)quality of the work material. usually material like wrough iron which is not homogeneous and cast iron which has pores in it, will tend to be problematic for deep drilling, drill bits are often devaited when it breaks into porous territory.
Jigging and drill bushing can be considered too.
Good luck to you.
Best regards,
ct
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
At the end of the day you probably don't care what process they use just that they can meet the required value for acceptable time & cost.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
One other suggestion would be to take some machining classes so you can better understand those processes.
Best Regards,
Heckler
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SW2005 SP 5.0 & Pro/E 2001
Dell Precision 370
P4 3.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
XP Pro SP2.0
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
Never argue with an idiot. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience every time.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
thru different depths and draw your own conclusions.
You might want to check out tap drilling for threads
and use their general guideline. These are for
steel parts but you will get the drift.
Accurately means something different to all of us.
What precision are you looking for?
They make pull drills too which are putting the
drill in tension as it is pulled thru the material.
You seem to have a lot of options suggested.
If you want blind holes, ie, holes that do not
go all the way thru, your options are different.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
on my drawings and the shop was very quick to tell
me what they could achieve. They should know your
specific equipment and they are probably the best
guide.
RE: Machining- Drilling with high positional tolerance.
I like to support the real important point (a) and (b) for that matter, as listed by Limct. If your workpiece has a difficult/non-concentric shape one might consider holding it in a special piece with a round perimeter.
Let us hear of the results if you indeed proceeded with the design as proposed.
Regards