×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Differential Driven Turbine

Differential Driven Turbine

Differential Driven Turbine

(OP)
Ok, This may not exactly fit in the engine and fuel forum, but it also doesn't really fit into any of the others either. So here goes.

I saw an issue of hotrod magazine (I think it was hot rod) that did a retro story on a product that was marketed in the 70's. It was a rear differential powered turbine. I can't find any reference to it online. I am fascinated by this idea, and I think it would be a kick in the pant to build one. The concept is sound, differential drives the compressor wheel and then you add fuel and the reaction becomes self sustaining as long as you feed it fuel. If memory serves me the only real problem it had was the adsolutely insane amount of power it flooded into the rear wheels. The tires would smoke the whole way down the track.

So my questions are these.
1. Has anyone seen this or at least heard of it? If so what was it called?
2. How difficult do you think it would be to figure this out and possibly build this again?

I think this would be a great show off type of drag race novelty and with todays technology it may be possible to control it and therefore actually be competative. (although I'm pretty sure this would exclude you from almost every racing class)

Let me Know what you all think

Tom  

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

I don't remember it.  Maybe I missed an issue.

You'd need a two-spool turbine to move the vehicle from a standing start, or start a single spool turbine during a burnout.  With anything close to normal road gears, you'd have to get the vehicle, or at least the rear wheels, up to ~60mph before lighting a single spool turbine.  

Maybe you could adapt a helicopter engine.  They're not as cheap as they were right after 'Nam; boat racers use 'em now, and they're not price- sensitive.

You'll need a _really_ strong scattershield.  Turbine engines are constant- speed devices, and bad things happen to them at other than design speed.  Read up on 'surge' and 'compressor stall' before you proceed.

Bring your wallet.  Even the nuts and bolts are hideously expensive.

Figure on cooking one diff per run, from the heat not the load.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

(OP)
I know I saw it in one of the Car rags, but I just cant find it. It is killing me.

From the article it sounds like they used it as a instant power adder, they would leave the line on motor only and then somewhere down the track they would feed it fuel and spark and it would give a constantly increasing surge of power.

Now, as I think I remember the company actually sold them and even had a version mounted on a Go Kart. I remember it being very small, with a diameter of no more than that of the rear diff. itself and it was probably only 2-3 feet long from what I could tell.

I dont recall the article talking about reliability but I dont think it would have been sold if it killed a diff. each run, I think this thing was only connected to the diff. by a drive shaft and a few mount bolts, other than that it looked self contained.

anyway, I will continue my search and hopefully there will be some more interest in this post.


Tom

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

That's funny you mentioned a helicopter engine, just before surfing over to this forum I was reading the Autoweek web page.  They have an article about Jay Leno's latest creation, a car powered by a helicopter turbine engine, but converted to bio-diesel to be 'environmentally friendly'.

The car is based on a Corvette Z06, has a body that looks like a mid 90's Cadillac concept car, and has 650hp/400lb-ft.  I don't know if the car actually runs or not.

IIRC linking to an outside page is frowned up here (or am I confusing this with another forum?), but go to the Autoweek home page for the article (or any of the numerous other automotive related sites that probably have an article about it).

Bob

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

I know a guy who puts helicopter engines in boats.  He says they're pretty reliable, and externally simple.  Modest starting battery, small lube oil pump, not so small fuel pump...

I wasn't aware that any 'conversion' was necessary to make a turbine run on bio-Diesel, except the sort of dirt/water filters that are used on Diesel boats anyway.

I just don't recall seeing anything about a turbine attached to the driveshaft or diff.  I do recall an article about an outboard motor spliced into the transmission tailshaft as a booster, or something.  I especially don't recall the 'why' part.  winky smile


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

(OP)
Hot Diggity, I finally found it. Ebay is good for more than most people realize. It was called the turbonique Turbine it was made as a promotional gimiik for a company of the same name to promote their new fuel.

I am unsure of how to post a picture in this forum,or even if you can. So search for the key word Turbonique, and be inspired. I wthink I would like to build one of these bad boys.

Tom

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

Oh, yeah, that's a real winner of an idea.  This page mentions the fate of Turbonique and its owner:

http://www.vaiden.net/rocket_gokart.html

This page has a little tech info about the axle:

http://www.almar.easynet.be/turbonique.htm

The 95,000 to 5,000 rpm gearbox would be a technical challenge.

Frankly, I don't think they'd let you near a dragstrip with a rig like that today.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

Just so we're clear, we've been talking about two distinct chemicals:

Nitromethane
Nitrocarbol
CH3NO2
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/0457.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0522.html
It is a useful industrial solvent, alleged modestly difficult to ignite but classified as flammable, shock sensitive when impure.

N-propyl nitrate
Nitric acid, propyl ester
Monopropyl nitrate
C3H7NO3
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/0539.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng1513.html
which Turbonique called Termolene, a name since appropriated for other products.  It is a monopropellant rocket fuel with no industrial uses, classified as highly flammable, and shock sensitive whether impure or not.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

Sorry.  Make that 'Thermolene'.  Dangerous stuff by any name.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

I remember a couple of articles on turbonique. Seems they campained a VW bug. I think they wrecked it, you know how VW's like to fly when they go to fast. I think there was a mustang too. The pictures I remember seeing were awe inspiring. The turbonique made serious power, and didn't weigh much. That was a recipe for speed, or disaster.

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

The first post is misleading. The Turbonique concept is not based on a differential driving a turbine (at least according to the articles posted). It is the opposite. A rocket engine powers a turbine which in turn drives the differential.

Any jet driven vehicle, water or air-craft is inefficient at low speeds. This one is not (in comparison).

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

If one wanted to build this again, one could probably use a turbine of a turbo and connect it to a rear axle of a go-kart. (Obviously the gear-box issue would still be there).
Instead of using a 'rocket-engine' to power the turbine, one could use an electrically powered centrifugal supercharger to feed a combustion chamber powering the turbine:
electric motor - supercharger - combustion chamber - waste gate - turbine - gearbox. Since this thing would only need to run 20 seconds (assuming it ignites immediately) or so one wouldn't need a lot of electric energy and it should be relatively safe. (Turbine can't go faster than the wheels and an electric motor is easy to control).
One could also use a turbo as gasturbine with its exhaust stream again driving a turbine of a turbo. (More difficult to control though.)
 
I wonder though whether that turbonique concept was indeed that dangerous? Apparently they were using the same concept for auxiliary powered superchargers on street driven cars: http://www.the-rocketman.com/images/tech/gallery5/TURBOCHARGER-ADVERTIS.jpg

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

You might want to check out avonaero.com for used surplus aircraft APU power turbines. Many (most?) include an integral gearbox to get about a 10:1 gear reduction. I'm told a used Allied Signal JFS-100 runs about $4,000 - $5,000.

It sounds like what you are proposing is a 2-spool turbine where you get rid of the "gasifier" turbine--run the gearbox backward and use the differential at 3000 rpm or so to drive a compressor at, say, 60,000 rpm; then just run that straight to the combustor and run a free power turbine off of the combustor. You'd need another gearbox for the power turbine, it would seem to me, which would be sort of weird but might work.

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

What I meant is: Instead of driving the compressor (e.g. of a turbo) by the turbine, drive it by an electric motor and thus do not need to worry about the speed of anything else: Similar to this thing: http://www.boosthead.com/product.php (Powering a small turbine of a turbo connected to a go-kart rear axle shouldn't require a lot of compressor power). Besides you don't care about efficiency (high pressure ratio) as long as it ignites.

The waste gate or any valve will make sure that you create some back pressure and don't burn up the turbine while standing.
The Turbonique guys didn't even use any valves they just lit the rocket and off they went (just with significantly more force off the line than what a conventional rocket engine would have achieved).

I guess an even simpler solution could be by using steam. A high pressure bottle mounted on a go-kart filled with water at 250 C. Steam is then released on the turbine of a turbo connected to the rear axle. This should be relatively quiet too and easy to control. (If you only need steam for 1/4 mile, the bottle/boiler might not need to be this big).

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

Turbonique's Differential-mounted rig that I read about sounded pretty cool.
I thought they just ran pure Hydrogen Peroxide through the turbine. It drove a second pinion gear, and could just freewheel when not being used for power.
(Peroxide catalyzed becomes steam and free oxygen, right?)

cheers
Jay

Jay Maechtlen
http://home.covad.net/~jmaechtlen/

RE: Differential Driven Turbine

I have a 1964-ish article about another Turbonique product.  A turbine driven turbocharger/supercharger.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources