Member Login

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

CBR value for base-course in roadworks

CBR value for base-course in roadworks

I would like to find out if an unsoaked CBR value can exceed 100% for a base-course material: maximum size aggregate 37.5mmm and having a continuous grading curve, sourced from a borrow pit.
Technical specifications impose a value of minimum 80% for base-course.
Thanks for your help.

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

What standard are you working from. CBR tests are only suitable for material <20mm. I would suggest a value in excess of 100% would be easily achievable. As for it being unsoaked, there is little point soaking non-cohesive material anyway.

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

Emilian...yes, a CBR can exceed 100, particularly in an unsoaked condition.  For the test, the lab can use a correction for the oversized material.

dirtman85....I disagree that only cohesive materials need to be soaked.  Stability is greatly dependent on the state of saturation relative to the compaction at the time of saturation.  A CBR or similar design curve is developed from the soaked condition, whether cohesive or non-cohesive.

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

Correction factors for oversized material are not the best idea Ron, they often entail extrapolation of a curve which is little more than a best guess, correction factors cannot take into account the destructive force on the larger particles as they are totally interdependant, eg; a lump of ash or clinker will obviously not behave in the same way as a lump of concrete when under stress, hence the true value and nature of the test is to remove fractions >20mm.

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

Dirtman...I'm not referring to a correction factor, but a volumetric replacement correction for the oversized material.

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

Thanks for your help, your replies gave me a better image about CBR.

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

I found this link over the internet and it confuses says that a high quality crushed stone material should have a CBR approx equal to 100%. What about my natural base-course? Still possible to exceed 100%? See below....

"The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is a simple strength test that compares the bearing capacity of a material with that of a well-graded crushed stone (thus, a high quality crushed stone material should have a CBR @ 100%)."

RE: CBR value for base-course in roadworks

Crushed stone base courses have a CBR >100% - if I remember, offhand, this is "given" in AASHTO pavement design (else it is 80%).  There is little difference between 80 and 100 or 120% as far as behaviour is concerned and I think that you can simply use the AASHTO recommendations.  Most specifications I have seen for natural sand and gravel subbases require CBR >30 and this isn't hard to get.  Ron is right - soaking is not just for clayey or silty soils but can be important in sands as well due to the transient buildup of porewater pressures in the pavement layers due to heavy (volume) traffic loading.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close