×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PHE fouling factor

PHE fouling factor

PHE fouling factor

(OP)

Hello to all

I would like to recive some information about the design of plate heat exchangers.
Last week I had a meeting with a PHE supplier in order to buy PHE for cooling water pourposis. During the meeting we were discussing about the fouling factor. This supplier told  me that in their design the fouling factor is not applicable because for the PHE is a non sense; in their design they consider a shear stress in the water flow trought the plates in order to garantee a cleaning effect in the plates. Is this true? Is it better to consider a fouling factor in order to design a heat transfer coefficient for clean condition and dirty conditions?
Thanks to all.

RE: PHE fouling factor

Do a search on this site and this forum.  This has been discussed many times.

rmw

RE: PHE fouling factor

I recently attended a seminar by Tranter where they discussed this very topic.  The reason that the fouling factor isn't used with PHEs is because it ends up being a self-fullfilling prophecy.  If you consider a fouling factor, and then design your exchanger larger to compensate, your velocity through the exchanger will be lower, leading to more fouling.  At least that was the gist of it.

RE: PHE fouling factor

(OP)
Hi Soapy 73
Thank you for your replay.
My meeting with a PHE supplier was Tranter.
Let me explain if I understood the problem:
In the design of PHE the main equation is Q = Ud*A*DTML, where Ud is the overall termal coefficient. The overall termal coefficient must follow this relationship: 1/Ud - 1/U0 > Rd where Rd, is the overall resistance to heat transfer and U0 is the coefficient in clean condition.
The U0 is a function of fluid film coefficients, this coefficient are function of the Nusselt number (turbolence condition) and so Reynolds and Prandtl. The turbulence in the PHE is higher than in tubolar exchangers and Uo is more bigger. If i consider the fouling factor the Ud will increase and so the surface area, this means more plates, more pressure drop, more costs and also it could happen less turbolence in the PHE and so less cleaning effect. So it's better to consider Ud = Uo. Is this all true? Does the   turbolence guarantee the cleanning effect? Is this necessary to guarantee the right performance in the PHE?
Thanks
DocMax
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources