×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

(OP)
Hello folks-

This is my first post in this forum (I'm active in several other eng-tips forums) so just for background, I've been working with Cosmos for well over 10 years (using the Geostar pre/post processor) and have recently started using SW.

I'm a bit perplexed by a model that I'm working with. If you can imagine an oversize 20# propane tank, thats about what I'm modeling. I'm running a simple gravity load on a model I built and meshed using shell elements. The issue I'm evaluating is how big of a hole I can tolerate in the support skirt on the bottom, so I'm running a buckling analysis. The models run fine in the stress analysis mode and result in about the stresses I'd expect. However, when I switch to the buckling study it kicks it out and claims that I have a singular matrix. I don't quite understand how this can be since the same mesh and boundary conditions work for the stress run. I figure I'm just missing some button to press or extra value to add that I'm missing due to my newbie factor with SW. Any ideas?

jt

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

Are you modelling the complete 360° of the tank?

Could it be that you actually do not have enough constraints and may be used something like soft spring stabilizing whilst running the stress study, but not so in the case of the buckling study?

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

(OP)
gfbotha-

Yes, I'm modeling the entire tank. Forgot the exact size but something like 10' diameter x 30' high with an 8' skirt. No symmetry. The bottom of the skirt is fixed (displacements and rotations). I should have identical loads and BC's on both the stress and buckling studies. Not using soft springs.

This is a fairly simple model and I might just go back to use the Geostar pre/post processor. Not as pretty, but it'll get the job done.

jt

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

Jte, just thought - not sure whether Geostar would change anything because depending what versions you have loaded, it is likely the solver used are still the same...

You could also try out/select the alternative solver (under study properties).  Or, play around with the number of buckling modes requested...

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

(OP)
gfbotha-

I guess I'm leaning towards Geostar since although it uses the same solvers, it only works on one FEA mesh while SW seems to work on different meshes (though the parameters may be copied) for different studies. I've never seen a model in Geostar which worked with a static analysis but kicked out of a buckling analysis with a singular matrix issue.

In SW I tried both solver options. Didn't consider the number of modes requested. Although it doesn't make sense to me that it should have any effect, I'll give it a shot. I've learned long ago that not everything in any software makes sense! Thanks for the idea.

jt

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

Glad you appreciate why I mentioned the number of modes (of course it does not make sense, but as you said...)  E.g. I have seen Cosmos DesignStar leaving the party when the analysis exceeded a certain size.

Please let us know if you find a way to succeed!

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

(OP)
Well, I cut my requested number of modes down from 5 to 3 and... wait, wait... it ran! But only on the first model I tried it with. The second one (different hole size) crashed out with the same error.

jt

RE: Singular matrix for buckling but not static analysis

Usually the lowest mode is sufficient because it is associated with the lowest critical load.

I just checked my e-manuals: the FFEPlus solver can calculate one buckling mode only...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources