Fastners connection in FEA!
Fastners connection in FEA!
(OP)
Hi,
I am the user of both abaqus and Pro/Mechanica. As fastner connections was introduced in the version 2.0 in pro/M. I found compared with abaqus, it is rather simple to make connection between two parts by screws or bolts, what you need to define is edges of the holes, materials, diameter of the bolts, or/and spring stiffness properties, etc. Most important, I don't need to model the real physical bolt parts in Pro/mechanica, I don't need to define the contact pairs between bolts and the parts.
However, I am not sure about the results in Pro/M, especially the contact pressure between bolts and parts. Of course, in Pro/M, bolts take all shear, so, no friction between parts exist.
In abaqus, you need to define surface-to-surface or node-to-surface contact, you need to model the bolts in beam elements, define the master and slave surface.
If my purpose is to ensure that the bolts are strong enough to hold or support under pressure/force between two parts, do you think Pro/M can fulfil my requirements. Thanks for ideas and opinions.
I am the user of both abaqus and Pro/Mechanica. As fastner connections was introduced in the version 2.0 in pro/M. I found compared with abaqus, it is rather simple to make connection between two parts by screws or bolts, what you need to define is edges of the holes, materials, diameter of the bolts, or/and spring stiffness properties, etc. Most important, I don't need to model the real physical bolt parts in Pro/mechanica, I don't need to define the contact pairs between bolts and the parts.
However, I am not sure about the results in Pro/M, especially the contact pressure between bolts and parts. Of course, in Pro/M, bolts take all shear, so, no friction between parts exist.
In abaqus, you need to define surface-to-surface or node-to-surface contact, you need to model the bolts in beam elements, define the master and slave surface.
If my purpose is to ensure that the bolts are strong enough to hold or support under pressure/force between two parts, do you think Pro/M can fulfil my requirements. Thanks for ideas and opinions.





RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
In fact I can think of no practical example where joints would be sized including friction. Maybe as a research excersise but not when it counts.
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
Killerbee, I may have misunderstood something in your post, but as I read it I have to totally disagree.
In turbomachinery, just to make an example, friction couplings between rotating parts are employed everywhere and everytime, except some very rare cases. All the shear load, coming from torque and other direct loads, is carried by the flanged parts through the friction. That's why special powders (silicium carbide especially) are put on the interface in order to have a stable and reasonably known friction coeficient (mu=0.5 +/- 5%, generally). Recently, pre-built films (silicium carbide in a very thin resin matrix) have been used instead, making erection on site even easier and controllable. Bolts are preloaded with a very high preload/live-load ratio. In this case, a careful and complete calculation of the joint (bolt+clamped parts, embedding effects, verification of the threads, of the bolt's resistant area, etc etc...) is mandatory. In this case, as the O.P. was asking, it would NOT be allowed to study the joint itself with a system like Pro/Mech.
If, instead, the need is to study the parts which are bolted together, then a "connection" like the one made possible by Pro/Mech (or CosmosWorks, just to mention another - in fact, every FE program has this opportunity, be it more or less difficult to set up) is, in my opinion, perfectly adequate. The designer will then have to separately calculate the joint itself.
Clamping forces vary in the life of a joint, that's a matter of fact, but:
- there are design techniques in order to make it less sensitive to preload loss in case of alternating loads
- there are calculation methods which allow to carefully account for all these factors (e.g. VDI2230)
- there are applications for which preload-bolted friction joints are not the best practice, or may even proove dangerous, but these are not the majority of cases.
I have examples of friction joints in hydraulic machines which have worked for something like 45 or 50 years, so you can imagine the degree of reliability we can achieve NOWADAYS on joints like that, with the improvements on material science and calculation techniques...
Regards
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
however, i think killerbee is talking about the preload in a bolt which is due to the friction on the threads, whihc isn't very well controlled ... and so it's of questionable value.
i'd just model the connection, which would give me the external load in the joint, and then design a bolt preload (including all the scatter factors and possibly thermal effects) to suit. And then you know the maximum clamping force, so you can design the pieces being clamped.
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
I say all the time, but mainly with heavy infrastructure. Most building applications are mostly bolt shear connections.
Regards,

Qshake
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
http:
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
Killerbee, Rb1957, I agree. Thank you to Rb1957 for having "bridged" what we were talking about.
Regards
RE: Fastners connection in FEA!
1) Load transfer between components?
2) stress distribution around the fasteners?
2) stress in fasteners itself?
After reading the manual, in Pro/M, I think what they can do is (1,2), not (3). Because we don't need to model bolts as solid or shell elements. So. we have no idea to see whether they are strong enough to hold external forces. Also, bolts take all the shear, without friction between parts involved. Moreover, linear analysis cannot catch the behavior where the preload is overcome and the joints start to open up.
It seems that most people rely on the hand calculation to predict the bolts stress. For example, based on the tensile area of bolts, the bolt stress can be calculated based on the force or torque applied to bolts.
thanks again to make me think!