Location of bearings in MV motor
Location of bearings in MV motor
(OP)
Recently, I got a 3.3 KV, 2000 HP, 990 RPM motor for a rotor rewind. It has a ball bearing (6234) on the Drive End (DE) and a roller bearing (NU 234) on the slipring end (ODE).
First time, I am seeing a roller bearing on the ODE and a ball bearing on the DE.
When asked, the OEM says the arrangement is correct.
Any views on this ? Anyone else has seen such a bearing set-up ?
First time, I am seeing a roller bearing on the ODE and a ball bearing on the DE.
When asked, the OEM says the arrangement is correct.
Any views on this ? Anyone else has seen such a bearing set-up ?





RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
I understand the functions of the bearings. But I have only seen that in a Roller & Ball bearing combination, the roller bearing is always at the Drive End due to its higher radial load rating.
In this motor, the roller bearing is at the non-drive end (ODE), where there is much less radial load as compared to the drive end.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
As per SKF manual, the dynamic load rating of the roller bearing 616 kN is while that of ball bearing is only 212 kN. So, it makes sense to have the roller bearing on the Drive End, the torque transmission point. But, OEM is insisting that their set up right without giving any reasons.
I hope the forum members can shed some light.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Hi, edison.
Your observation is keen enough to distinguish the difference! Such bearing location is unfamiliar to me! I been dismantling machines ranging from general purpose to integral horsepower or even DC machines but yet i can't relate such arrangement. Weird!
Though, ID/OD of bearing are the same - obviously it 6234/NU234, i wonder why OEM configured that design?
I been through with rolling mills apllication (DC or Wound Induction Machine) but this configuration is nowhere to be found.
Ed, your post is interesting. Maybe we could clear this bit by bit..
What is the load your machine?
How's the coupling configuration?
COuld you give us actual scenario in which the machine is in actual operation?
regards,
bil
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
I intend to swap the bearings.
I am still hoping some one might have come across this type of bearing set up and have some explanation for it.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Is it vertically mounted? I know Siemens will sometimes fit ball bearings in the DE if axial loads permit, and rollers on the nde.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Ed, could you describe further the coupling assembly? Is it flexible coupling with rubber or spring support, with spacers?
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
It's rigid, whew! This really uncommon. I thought, it's flexible. Interesting.
Do you mind to give me the Motor manufacturer and Specification? I would like to discuss this configuration to our senior consultant.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
I have seen that array on other European motors. The only reason is to fix (lock) the driving end side of the shaft and allow for thermal expansion of the shaft over the roller bearing.
The motor application described does not have any extreme radial load on the driving end since it is rigid coupled to the gear box, then a ball bearing on this location is the best solution. If you swap those bearings, a thrust force (due to thermal expansion) will be exerted against the gear bearing.
Only problem with roller bearings light radial load is skidding, generating heat and noise. I hope the unbalanced magnetic pull plus the rotor weight make the rollers "roll" instead of "skid".
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Also, isn't the radial load higher on the DE due to torque transmission even in directly coupled machines ?
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
A perfect aligned motor-load shafts will have no radial force due to the torque transmited to the load. A torque is the result of an identical pair of oposed forces.
If your transmision is via belts or chain, the tension perpendicular to the shaft will impose a moment to the shaft extension that result in a radial load reaction on the bearing.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
I would be tempted to leave the bearings as is. In a solidly coupled configuration, you want the axial shaft growth to be opposite of the driven machine, in your case - out the back end of the motor. This way, the motor shaft can do what it has to do and not interfere with any other machine.
We have played games with bearing location many times in the mining industry, and that has been out biggest concern - axial growth vs. axial clearance.
Raisinbran
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
Ed, aoladle best explains the bearing configuration effect on motor operation.
Needless to explain further about our consultant's view since they both had similar reason.
So, let your dog sleep!
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
OK. Two more votes against me.
I feel like Dubya right now.
RE: Location of bearings in MV motor
- First I got an hydro unit generator asincronous one, with pelton turbine that got the next configuration:
- Drive end: 1 roller bearing
1 angular bearing.
-Non drive end:
1 roller bearing
I think the angular bearing is only to support the axial effort, cause the roller bearing have no posibilities of support it.
And about the idea of the perfect alignement machine, I never found one... When do you say the machine got a good alignement, I´m not talking of zero.
And about the idea that in a perfect alignement machine there`s not radial forces, If you use an pelton turbine with one injector, you loose the pair of oposite forces.
Cheers to everybody and salud from sunny spain