×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Runoff question

Runoff question

Runoff question

(OP)
I am a new engineer working on a runoff calculation. I am to use the 25 year, 24 hour rainfall event and calculate if a retention pond can hold the water. I have calculated the volume of the pond. I think one of the assumptions is that there is 100% runoff, because the water is running off of a salt pile. Hydrology is definitely not my strong point so if someone can give me some ideas i would appreciate it!

RE: Runoff question

Not likely that you will have 100%.  For 25-year storm, we use a value between .83 and .94 for the C coefficient for pavement and rooftops.  Pick a reasonable value for C and then see what your safety factor is in the pond volume.  Make sure you have some freeboard to account for uncertainty in amount of precipitation or to account for sediment accumulation in the pond.

RE: Runoff question

(OP)
I have some calculations that a previous engineer had done for this same project about 6 months ago, and for some reason he assumed 100% runoff. This baffles me because there is a pipe underneath the salt pile which is used for the water that is infiltrating into the salt pile. He did account for freeboard like you mentioned CVG. I guess one of the things I am having trouble with is to calculate the volume of runoff, he multiplied his area times his rainfall event (which is 3.9 inches). To me this seems likes the whole area would have 3.9 inches of water covering it...Does this seem correct?

RE: Runoff question

you are correct and that is a conservative assumption.  Note that Francesca is correct that if you are not "retaining" but instead "detaining" the storm runoff then rational method can't be used.  

RE: Runoff question

(OP)
Ok so all of this water is going into an evaporation pond, where it is being held until it all evaporates. So this would be a retaining pond right? and then I can go ahead and use the rational method...

RE: Runoff question

sounds like a retention pond to me

RE: Runoff question

(OP)
thanks for the help cvg

RE: Runoff question

Pond designs I have been involved with included 12" freeboard with a 6-foot wide 6" deep overflow spillway.  In the event your pond receives more flow than you anticipated, it is appropriate to plan where it will go, and how it will get there!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources