×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Computer Performance Comparison - FEA
4

Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

(OP)
I have just received a reassignment in my company and my new focus will be FEA analysis using several different FEA packages, including ANSYS and Vector Fields.  In addition, I will be doing most of my modeling in Solidworks.  I need to get a new computer – preferably a laptop, and am trying to put together validation for what I would like to acquire for my new system.  Does anyone know of good benchmark studies that have been done on new systems/configurations?  I am trying to justify large amounts of RAM and a 64 bit processor, but need some good comparisons, studies, etc.

I will take tips and suggestions for desktops as well.

Thanks much in advance.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

I can't help you with the justification other than to comment that hopefully your management recognizes that at the $200 or so per hour you are costing them it is worthwhile to spend a few bucks more to get you the fastest laptop you can reasonably get and replace it every two or three years.

A few months ago (so by definition its obsolete now) I got a Dell M90 http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?c=us&cs=04&kc=6W300&l=en&;oc=m90min&s=bsd  with a T2700 Duo processor, 2 gig RAM, and nVidia Quadro FX graphics card with 512 Mb. Runs Solidworks and Cosmos just fine for me… Haven't tried Abaqus on it but I probably will soon. Its heavy but I've traveled with it and for the most part I set it up on a desk to work and the big screen is a huge advantage for modeling vs a lighter but smaller laptop.

jt

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

The companies providing commercial FE software usually tests their software on various hardware congifuration.

You could check their web-sites for this kind of information.

For example, for ABAQUS v6.5 you can find here some benchmarks:

http://www.abaqus.com/products/Benchmarks/performance65.xls
http://www.abaqus.com/products/performance65.html


I am almost sure other FEA software developing companies must have similar benchmarks.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

I agree with that working on finite elemenet, big screen, at least 19" is necessary!!!

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

John-

Show me a laptop with a 19" display!

jt

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Dell M2010  though it pushes the definition of "laptop" a bit.    The Alienware Aurora mALX has a 19" screen, as does the Voodoo Envy U-909.  Sagar/Prostar also sell notebooks with 19" screens.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

It's worth running a job and studying the perfmon (or equivalent) during the job. Then you can see whether your current machine is spending most of its time with the CPU at 100%, and whether disk thrashing or RAM read/writes dominate.

In my case I found that the CPU spent much less than half the time at 100%, but the disk was running flat out for minutes at a time so I put the money into RAM, 'luckily' my model just fit inside the 2 GB limit.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Well a laptop certainly isn't ideal for FEA and in general are a compromise.

FEA performance is directly related to I/O speed. That points to SCSI drives and generally you do not get those in a laptop. Gobs of RAM helps but its the read/write speed of these drives that really permit you run large models. So I'd say go find a desktop with a couple of scsi drives and 4 gig of ram with a fast single threaded processor and an excellent graphics card (and yes the best graphics cards are not found in a laptop).

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

(OP)
Thank you all for your comments and suggestions.  Alas, the god of IS has set forth its will and essientially squashed the idea of a laptop.  As it turns out, the corporate standard for an engineering desktop is a Dell 490, with Intel 5150 Dual Core, 2GB RAM and an 250Mb nVidia Quadro FX 3450.  I am pushing for two monitors, 4 Gb RAM, and two processors, but I am breaching corporate standard so I don't know if I will get it.  I will keep you all posted.  Thanks again for all the suggestions.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

The newest workstation from DELL is Precision 690, which can be customized with up to 64Gb RAM (with XP Pro x64 Edition).

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Btw: if you want to buy from Dell , you may get a more performant machine (refurbished) on their outlet web-page.

If I had to buy a machine for FEA purposes, my criteria would be ranked:

1. RAM > = 4Gb   (Now I am working on a machine with 2Gb which restricts the mesh refinement for my models sad. )

2. 2 x CPU > 3.0 GHz (Some FE software may require additional licenses , (i.e. more money) to use multiple processors, e.g. ABAQUS.)

3. HDD > 320Gb, 10,000rpm

4. Graphic card > 256Mb (It may be important for post-/pre-processing, CAD modeling)
......

n. Monitor


RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

the posts above are giving you good direction .. get the biggest computing power you can.  i'd get a desktop to work with and a cheap laptop for the road ... if you're allowed to VPN to your computer (from outside) and use "remote desktop" to run your computer through a different keyboard/screen (ie the laptop).  some companoes don't allow this as being a security "opportunity".

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

(OP)
I would love to write my own computer specification, however, one of the downfalls (at least in my mind) our corporate IS department, is that they have an agreement with Dell that Dell will supply two or three 'standard' systems and the 'high-end engineering' system, is a Dell as described above.  I would prefer to go with the Dell 690, but not with our IS.  I would prefer to go with 64bit, but not with our IS at this time, though they are talking about migration that direction in the not-so-far distant future.  I would much prefer 10,000 RPM hard drives, but their standard is 7200 RPM.  Hopefully you understand my problem, and now it is just what I can hopefully fenagle.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

the new big lie ...

"hi, I'm from IT; I'm here to help you"

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Yup, sometimes the IT folks forget that they exist to support other company operations. You are their client, but sometimes they take the attitude of "We're not satisfied 'till you're not satisfied!"

With local management support, though... I have a generic IT system for generic email etc type work, a NON-standard laptop and a NON-standard desktop for FEA. Not an ideal situation, but it keeps the IT folks happy - they don't/won't/can't support the non-standard machines and those are not connected to their network so they can pretend they don't exist. The biggest problem with that setup for me is that when its time to print I need to memory stick files over to my generic 'puter to reach a printer.

jt

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

(OP)
I very much agree with your assessment jte.  Though I have not found it in print, but I am pretty sure our IS department’s motto is something like, “if we have to actually work to support you, you won’t have it.”  Unfortunately, it isn’t just me that has to deal with this mish-mash, but all of engineering, especially our designers suffer because they are actually required by their jobs to actually do their jobs.  That involves working on computer hardware that is designed for the bean counters, not for the designers and especially not for the engineers.  It is a rather sad commentary on where we have come, versus where we should/could be.

elf

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Elfman,

Whatever you go for ensure you run some test jobs on it to see if it meets your needs. I've been caught out by having to buy some IT without doing this and never felt I got the best spec for the money that was out there.

xerf has the spec pretty good the only things you need to be careful of are :-

1) Yes, licence costs are much greater when using two or more processors.
2) Memory management across two or more processors can be very poor on some architectures leading to analyses that run little quicker than on a single CPU.
3) The OS can have an effect. I'm benchmarking a multi-processor system (2 x dual-core) at the moment and XP64 is slower than Linux when accessing more than one processor on a physical chip.

I have good support from our IT guy despite the comapny having similar policies to those described above. He is actively interested in this cute new stuff that is about and really does want to help.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

A laptop is a joke for a serious stress analyst. It's maded for bussines people to impress the stupid ones (which represents the majority). Talk with a good IT engineer and you'll get the right answer.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Look for a good desktop that is customized for running games... FEA requirements are similar... Gaming machines generally have the processing snort and graphics requirements.  Then try it out with a demo program run...

Dik

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Hi,
rtmpxr, I remember a Dell M50 some YEARS ago... I don't think you'd call it a joke... OK, you can joke even with 4GB RAM and 3 GHz processor (remember, it was about 3 years ago...). Of course, on the other side, the power of a desktop workstation is far higher...

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

(OP)
Yet another update.  IT has won.  They whittled me down till I am getting essentially the same thing everyone else is getting.  However, the engineering manager has stepped up and we are thumbing out noses at IT and getting our own systems that will meet our needs.  The only rub is that we will be loosing our connection to the network and internet on these machines.  As such our floating licences will now be a huge issue for me - I am hoping to overcome this with a KVM and a Reverse KVM switch rigged such that others can use the new box as well as me.  Really kind of sucks all things considered.  If IS would just do the job they are hired to do...  Oh well.  

I will be spec'ing out a Dell Precision 690, XP64, 8GB RAM, I was hoping for two monitors, but where I will be having to rig a Reverse KVM, as far as I have been able to look, I have not found a Reverse KVM that will support two monitors.  I am now thinking that maybe just a widescreen will get me the desktop space needed while making the KVM setup possible.  Any ideas will be much appreciated?  

The laptop is out, for sure.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

cbrn,
Maybe I was out of luck with laptops. Used just for demos on customer site. I prefer to build my own rig and maximise it's performance. And don't forget he wants to use Solidworks also. No chance with a laptop. I still consider the laptop a fancy toy for a serious engineer.

RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Quote (rtmpxr):


And don't forget he wants to use Solidworks also. No chance with a laptop.

Solidworks works for me just fine on my laptop. It runs the same problems about 10% slower than my custom built desktop. I prefer the desktop for the real keyboard and display, but prefer to not lug those around when I travel. Guess I'm just not as hard core of a user as some others... Can't say that I've seen anyone checking in a desktop at the airport though.

jt


RE: Computer Performance Comparison - FEA

Like always de gustibus non est disputandum :) For the airport example I give you a star :)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources