×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Foundation Design

Foundation Design

Foundation Design

(OP)
Soil study shows that an area for a future 4 storey structure have a soil bearing capacity of 334Mpa at 2 meters deep and projected 25mm settlement for the proposed load. The soil study also suggest that rigid tie beam should be installed to contain uneven settlement and isolated footings can be used.

Previous design prior to soil investigation use isolated footing at a minimum depth of 1.2 meter design at 200 Mpa soil bearing capacity. The new design is now only 3 storey, the 4th floor is deleted.

Should the rigid tie beam still be necessary considering that the structure weight now is lighter?

RE: Foundation Design

The same potential for differential settlement will still be there with similar footing bearing stresses. Presumably you will still design for 334 KPa (?) allowable at 2 metres down. The footings will just be a bit smaller for the 3 storey, assuming construction type is similar.

RE: Foundation Design

Using a conversion factor of 1 MPa = approx 2090 psf, it seems the values you have for bearing capacity are several magnitudes of order too high for soil. I could be wrong though, since I have not used metric units in decades. Is it possible your units were meant to be KPa instead of MPa?

RE: Foundation Design

(OP)
Thank you apsix and henri2. By the way It is 334 Kpa not 334 Mpa. The design still use 200 Kpa at a depth of 2.0 meters. At this value which will and a lighter 3-storey structure, will I still need tie beams?

RE: Foundation Design

A decision cannot be made due to the deletion of a story. The result of a study determined that rigid tie beams were required for the 4 story building. Without the 4th floor, are the results telling you the same thing?

RE: Foundation Design

(OP)
No study were made if 3-storey structure will be constructed on site.

RE: Foundation Design

What I'm saying is that a study was performed for the 4 story bldg. The study determined that differential settlement is sufficient to cause problems and that tie beams are required. The questions should be, will the three stories still experience a significant differential settlement? Unless there is zero settlement on all footings, differential settlement will occur and tie beams may be required.

RE: Foundation Design

Generally structues are designed to accomidate an 1" (25mm)of differential settlement, so the rigid beam may have been belt and suspender approach. If they bare to control settlemnt, I am not sure how they would limit settlement unless they are grade beams that are intended to absorb bearing loads. If they are tie beams for foundation rigidity, I suspect they have been included for seismic or other lateral load concerns. Best bet is to talk to the engineer who generated the report.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources