×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
We recently installed two separate risers covering several different areas of the building. Each is covered by its own FDC located on the same side of the building.

The fire marshal recently commented that the two fire systems have to be connected together, With one FDC. Is this an NFPA code requirement or other national code requirement?

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Is the building a highrise? If so, NFPA 14 would require the FDCs to be interconnected because it requires two remote but connected FDCs on a highrise building.

If not, I would say that it is not required. See NFPA 13, section 8.16.2.4.5. You are required to provide a sign indicating the portions of the building served by the individual FDCs.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

The last civil design we did the fire marshal made us use only one FDC.  I don't believe this was a code requirement, just the personal preference of the fire marshal.  Their rationale was that they didn't want the firefighters looking around for different FDC's or worrying about whether they were hooked up to the right FDC.  This was for a 100,000 square foot one story building.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

While not an NFPA issue many fire codes, BOCA for one, require if a building has multiple FDC's then all FDC's be interconnected so if you pump into one you charge all the systems in the building.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

But not in the International Fire or Building Code ...

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
Hi Sprinkler Designer,

We thought we had a solution. We have a water pit at curbside from which we thought we could tie into the fire water line at that point and charge the system from the street. Only problem is that this fire water line, in addition to being the source for the two FDC's at the building, also charge the Hydrant loop around the building. The fire marshal did not like it and his only reason for not accepting this solution is because  it is not done elsewhere in his township.

Is there a code (any) that would prohibit doing it this way, i.e., charging both the FDC's and hydrants?

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Moondoggy:

I have done something similar on many large warehouse projects.  There is a supply from the city main to the pump room.  From there, we exit the pump and install the underground fire loop around the building.  This puts all of the hydrants on the loop at pump pressure.  We then installed 2-way hydrants, instead of the 3-way with pumper connections.  The AHJ ws just concerned that some one would try to connect from the pumper outlet on the hydrant to the pump on the truck.  Since the hydrants only had 2.5" outlets, that was not a problem.  

The only thing that would caution me in your scenario is if the hydrants are not on a dedicated fire line.  You don't want to charge the water loop if there are domestic devices coming off of it.  In the situation I described above, we always had a dedicated fire loop around the building.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
Hi TravisMack,

Could you give me alittle better understanding of your first paragraph. I am having a little trouble understanding what you described.

Again, I have a fire loop around the building, 8" piping to which five hydrants are installed around the building. Off this line I tapped into it at two separate points and brought water into the building to feed two independent backflow preventers feeding separate sprinkler riser systems within the building. A FDC is feed into each fire riser header.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

OK..let's see if I can describe this better.

Let's say you have a large warehouse, with a pump room located in the NW corner of the building.  We would make a tap from the city main and run it directly to the pump at the NW corner.  Off of this line would be a "suction" 3-way hydrant.  From the pump discharge, we would go back underground and feed a fire line loop around the building.  Off of this loop would be fire hydrants and lead-ins to the various system risers.

There would be one FDC located at the pump room.  The FDC would charge the entire site fire line, thereby charging all of the hydrants and risers/systems.  The 3-way suction line hydrant is located adjacent to the FDC and upstream of the pump.  This allows the FD to connect to a pumper connection on the hydrant and then go to the pump on the truck.  From there, they can charge the ENTIRE SYSTEM via the FDC.

Doing this provides a single point of connection for the entire facility.  Most of the AHJs I have dealt with prefer this arrangement for these large facilities.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
Hi TravisMask,

Thanks for the clarification. Now if I understand you, charging the entire hydrant exterior loop as well as the interior riser pipes from a single FDC is acceptable?

We had an inspection from the local code fire inspector today. He was sent to review our approved fire sprinkler system drawing and the actual installation. We put the system in in accordance with the Fire Code Inspector Approved Fire System Drawing which approved the individual FDC connections not interconnected. It did not matter that they previously approved this installation. Today they said we had to interconnect the two separate riser installations and run a line to the front of the building to a single FDC. This involves installation of an additional 700 feet of piping through a food facility already in operation.

We proposed giving them a new FDC connection at the valve pit located at the curb. It would charge the exterior hydrant loop as well as charging the two separate, currently installe FDC's and thereby their associated riser sprinkler systems to which they supply. From your description, this approach seems acceptable. We just need to convince the Fire Prevention people.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Moondoggy:

That is exactly what I was saying.  I can understand them not wanting 2 FDCs.  It can be confusing.

What you are proposing with the single FDC to charge the entire system is not a problem.  I would ask the inspector to show you where in the standards that it says you can't do that.  He may try to hang up on the fact that you can't have a shutoff valve in the FDC piping.  However, if you read further into NFPA 13, you can have shut off valves for multiple riser systems.

I think you have a winning argument all around.  The only thing you may have to look at is your backflow prevention.  If you put the FDC on the incoming line, you will likely need to have a backflow preventer between the city supply and the FDC.  If you just have check valves in your area, it should not be a real issue.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Take a look at NFPA 13, 2002 page 235 and figure A8.15.1.1.4. It shows a pit with an FDC. This is very common way to feed the system. I perfer this set up then running 700' of 4 inch pipe, not good when you have high sprinkler demands.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Also take a look at the Fire Protection Handbook, 19th edition, Chapter 20, page 10-393,Fire Department connections, will help with your case to the FD. Check out Automatic Sprinkler System Handbook, 2002 edition, page 333, exhibit 8.41, and the comments in blue at the top of the page. All info to make your case with, good luck, let us know how it turns out.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

If you already have a fdc feed inside the building a way to go is tee off of that feed inside the building and hot the same size feed main on the other system at the nearest point and you are interconnected. All you need is an addtional check valve.

I would say the problem wit trying to pressurize both the fire hydrants and sprinkler system is you may never get any pressure to the system with the amount of pipe laid and if you have two or three fire trucks sucking from the same lines.
Also, if you have a fire pump being feed by the same main, you cannot have the fdc before the intake it has to be connected on the discharge side

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Bah, I hate stupid questions... but how else can you learn?

What does the acronym FDC stand for?

thumbsup2

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
FDC: Fire Department Connection

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

maybe I didn't explain properly, but the FDC is installed on the discharge side of the pump in the scenario presented above.

As far as not getting pressures, we have calculated the system and allowed for a fire hose allowance at the loop to account for the Fire Dept use of the line.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
Can anyone provide me with a copy of the NFPA 13, 2002 page 235, figure A8.15.1.1.4. If not can you paraphrase or describe what it says.

Same for the Fire Protection Handbook, 19th edition, Chapter 20, page 10-393,Fire Department connections and the Automatic Sprinkler System Handbook, 2002 edition, page 333, exhibit 8.41, and the comments in blue at the top of the page. My sprinkler contractor does not have these versions.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

moondoggy

sorry I throw a fire pump into your set up.

I still do not like the set up wher you pressuirze the sprinklers and fire hydrants. There is the potential to rob the sprinkler system.

Once again you can connect from one fdc inside the building to the nearest largest main in the other system and supply a check valve. this may cut down on the amount of pipe that needs to be run.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Cdafd:
What is the difference if you pressurize the entire loop and take water from the discharge hydrants, or if you take water from the suction hydrants.

I can do a K14 50 PSI ESFR (1200 gpm system demand) system with a 1000 GPM pump and not pressurize the loop, or I can use a 1500 GPM (1200 gpm system demand + 250 hose allowance) pump and pressurize the loop.  How is it really any different?  If I don't pressurize the loop, I size my pump for the sprinkler system only.  If I do pressurize the loop, the pump is sized for the system demand plus hose allowances.

On very large projects, it can be a considerable cost savings to  pressurize the loop and install multiple pressurized lead-ins to the buildings to serve a riser manifold.  The project I am thinking of was 1.3 million sq ft under roof.  There were 33 overhead systems and 3 in-rack systems.  It was determined that the cost savings to do the pressurized loop was significant on the project.

I am curious as to the objections, and not trying to argue.  I am trying to learn from others.  Do you feel that the hose allowances required by NFPA are inadequate to and cause you to rob from the system?  

Stookey - If you are following this thread, what are your thoughts on this scenario?

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Moondoggy:

The figure in questions shows:
Tapping the city main--> installing piping from the city main to an underground pit-->in the pit you have in direction of flow: check valve->gate valve->FDC-->then the diagram indicates to continue to your system.

Travis

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Well Travis, since you asked:

I agree with your interpretation. The last mega warehouse/manufacturing/Group H occupancy I reviewed and approved was a 764,000 square foot bottled water plant (largest in North America). We installed a master Fire Department Connection downstream of the pump suction. The FDC had its own 100 foot feed main and was located near a municipal hydrant. Frankly, these demands are starting to get so big with the new sprinkler technology I am really scrutinizing pipe sizes for remote FDCs.

While our designs are different, your going to be in the same condition if the pump takes a dump. That is why an accessible, easily identified FDC is so important.

I believe NFPA 13 gives us the flexibility to allow both designs. My question is "what is the other option?" In your case Travis, 33 different FDCs sure as hell will confuse the responders and then that is when the poo hits the fan. Firefighters must understand (especially in warehouses protected by the new sprinkler technology) that they need to start pumping the FDCs as their first fireground action, not their third. Second action: send a firefighter to the pump (when one is provided) to make sure it is running.

Sorry about my delay in responding but I am in the nation's capital at hotel that darn sure is not worth $185 for a one day meeting.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

(OP)
Hi TravisMask,

Thanks for the information. One final question. After it says "continue to your system", does it infer that it goes only to a building sprinkler system or does it suggest both the building sprinkler system and the private hydrants around the facility???

I did come across a Santa Clara County, CA report online that confirms they have such a system for in the report they state to paint the tops of the private hydrants white to indicate that these are also fed from the single FDC.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

There is no further description to indicate what it goes to..

Not to beat you up over anything, and I don't mind paraphrasing information for you, but you can go to NFPA.org and I believe you can purchase a PDF copy of the NFPA 13 fairly cheap.  I know it is a lot cheaper than 700' of pipe through a live facility smile

If I could cut and paste the diagram for you, I would...but I don't know how to do it on this forum.

Travis

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Scott -

I hope you are getting in some sight seeing in DC.  My wife is on the hunt for homes to look at in TX.  She is ready to go today.  She is looking at DFW / Ausin / San Antonio.  The home prices seem so "cheap" compared to Phx.

I agree entirely on the FDC not be sized enough.  I was shot down by the PM on the large warehouse I mentioned above.  We had a system demand in the 2000+ gpm range for one of the areas that was flammable liquid storage.  I wanted to calculate the system to the FDC and let the FD know what pressure they needed to be able to provide.  I also wanted to run the FDC to match the fire pump discharge size - 10" for this project.  However, the sprinkler contractor PM for the project shot that down.  He was adamant that they were only going to install a 4" siamese connection.  I think that I finally got him to at least accept a 6" x 2.5"x2.5"x2.5" FDC.  His rationale was that according to NFPA (and this was supported by communication from NFSA) that the FDC is not meant to be the sole supply of a system, and only a supplement.  Therefore, the 4" should be adequate to supplement.  The only time the FDC is the supply is for a manual standpipe.

Travis

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

TravisMack
not sure what you do but san antonio city is looking for a fpe and use to be cheaper to live there than austin, dallas area prices are  all over the place depending on where you want to live.
  "His rationale was that according to NFPA (and this was supported by communication from NFSA) that the FDC is not meant to be the sole supply of a system, and only a supplement."
Have heard that also. A question would be does the lcoal fire dept have the pumper or pumpers and the knowledge to supply a higher demand system.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

cdafd:

I am just a lowly NICET IV Fire Sprinkler System Eng Tech smile  Or something like that...just get paid to play connect the dots..

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Travis:

If you were in my jurisdiction you would have sized the FDC for the demand. Especially for a high challenge risk like flammable liquids.

And IMHO, some of those NFSA interpretations are crap and are only intended to help the contractor. In this case NFSA doesn't really understand the hazards of flammable liquid fire protection(again, personal opinion).

DC was a day trip so not a lot of sights. I found most everyone to be nice in the Crystal City area. Downtown Arlington was another story.

And since your wife is looking in the hill country area, check the area around Bastrop and Kyle. New communities and this is an area with a great deal of growth. If you want an Austin realtor I have a great one. Plus, we have one of the strongest SFPE chapters in the US (160 + members) who host really good seminars. Aww, what the heck, come to Austin. We may be a little more expensive but the quality of life is much better. I suggest South Austin - easier pace than North Austin and less expensive.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

scott can you reply to two items
1. do you feel a normal fd has the equipment and training to support a high demand system if the ug to the sprinkler system is shut off but you still have working hydrants.

2. set ups that can rob the sprinkler system when the fire truck is hooked up to near by hydrants.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

1)If the firefighters bring their brains to work. Like I've said, there is a full moon every third day and it is when B shift comes to work.

2) I don't understand what you are asking.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

Because of some of the ways the ug mains are set up that have fire hydrants and sprinkler systems off of the same main the fire truck draws the pressure that should be going to the fire sprinkler system. would say mainly on private mains.

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

If you have one FDC after the city curb box and check valve feeding a private main around the building, then the FD should feed the FDC with a public fire hydrant. They should NOT connect to any of the private yard hydrants with a pumper. They will need to stretch hose from the next public fire hydrant to the site. Remember the sprinkler design only allows 250 gpm ( ESFR) or 500 gpm other warehouse occupancies for the FD hose lines. If they use more then this they will start to steal water from the sprinkler system. IF the building is gone when they pull up, then by all means use all the private fire hydrants to surround and drown.

FD should understand NFPA 13E, Fighting Fires in Sprinklered Buildings. A pre-fire plan would also help in this situation.

I agree the FDC and pipe should be sized for the maximum flow of the sprinkler system. I do NOT agree with NFPA 13. If we have an electric fire pump and we loose power, how is the FD going to feed the sprinkler system if it needs 1500 gpm at 140 psi to control and extinguish the fire!  

RE: Multiple fire risers and multiple FDC's

LCREP

thanks for the reply that is what I was asking. I agree somewhat with the idea of enough fdc's to supply the system, but not sold on it. I have seen it done a number of times. need to admend the local code to require it and makes it a little easier.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources