×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Water in Neutrals of MV Cable - Reason for Concern?

Water in Neutrals of MV Cable - Reason for Concern?

Water in Neutrals of MV Cable - Reason for Concern?

(OP)
I posted earlier this week about sheath testing on a 34.5 kV collection system and with the information I got here coupled with some information from the cable supplier, I now know why our EPC is failing these tests.  Basically, (1) they were testing the sheath at too high of a voltage level (10 kV instead of 4.6 kV) and (2) they were being too rough w/ the cable during installation inflicting nicks and small cuts in the jacket that were not inconsequential as was thought.  Going forward, I think we are in good shape--they are using a new installation process and the sheath tests will be done at a much lower voltage.  

But what about the cable that's already in the ground?  

We have observed numerous small holes w/ burn marks from the 10 kV megger tests in the cables we've checked.  Obviously, the jacket can no longer be watertight at these locations, but the engineer from the cable company says this is OK.  He says the purpose of the jacket is to mechanically protect the neutral and to hold it tight against the semicon.  He claims that corrosion in these areas will not harm the semicon and that you'd only get into trouble if you had an area 20-30' in length where a voltage gradient could reach levels high enough to arc.  

Do we have any MV cable experts out there?  Is a waterproof jacket necessary?  Why or why not?

Related - These are end-bonded/grounded runs, so I don't believe intermediate ground points will cause a problem electrically like they would on a cross-bonded or single-point bonded run. (Let me know if you see a problem w/ this statement...)

Thanks,

FEinTX

RE: Water in Neutrals of MV Cable - Reason for Concern?

I think waterproofing is important.  We've had to replace much of our URD cables, due to water trees.  And after going out a few times with the lads, and hearing homeowners complain about our trenching trying to dig up the location of failures, we do everything we can to get stop water from getting to the cable.

We've been spec'ing Pirelli SuperDri cable, to keep water from ingressing into the cable, once the integrity of the sheath has been broken. Water will eventually corrode the neutral conductor, if it isn't protected by a jacket.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources