×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

"Wet" set first course of Masonry

"Wet" set first course of Masonry

"Wet" set first course of Masonry

(OP)
I have been asked by several masonry contractors to "wet" set the first course of hollow unit block for a retaining wall. According to the code we use(2001 Calif. BC), this is not permitted.  I get the usual "we do this all the time" response from the contractor. However, what would be the problem of "wet" setting the first course if all the forces can be resolved?

RE: "Wet" set first course of Masonry

You might explain what "wet setting" masonry means.

RE: "Wet" set first course of Masonry

The first course in set on TOF while concrete is still fresh?  How is this mo better?  How do they get layout correct?  Never seen that here.

RE: "Wet" set first course of Masonry

If the "wet" setting you're describing is what I think it is, ie: litterally setting the first course of masonry block into the plastic concrete of the footing, I think I can explain a few problens...

1.  The masonry will absorb water from the concrete, reducing the local strength around the base setting of the wall.  Mortar is mortar, concrete is concrete.  Just because they both are cementitious does not mean they are interchageable.  Would you accept concrete as a mortar bed material?  Neither would I...
2.  I would be very concerned about what has happened to the reinforcing bars in the footing.  Have they shifted, lowered down and eliminated their required clear cover, etc, etc, etc.    There is just no way of knowing, and that's a problem.
3.  I have actually seen a contractor pushing the reinforcing bars into the footing through the hollows in wet-set masonry block.  Kind of funny, but not very impressive, and certainly not acceptable.
4. And the number one problem (IMHO):  The blocks actually sink slowly into the footing, preventing the concrete from setting up properly and grossly reducing the strength of the footing to wall interface.

I remember there was a list of five things when I was taught to watch for this, but for the life of me #5 escapes me at the moment...  I'll post it if I can remember.  I think it had to do with trapped air, or perhaps that air entrainment is underirable in a meterial bonding to CMUs.  I'll scratch my head a bit for you...

Hope that helps,
Regards,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: "Wet" set first course of Masonry

(OP)
Yes, the contractor literally installs the first course of block on fresh concrete.  The vertical reinforcing is tied in place prior to the concrete pour, so "stabbing" the rebar isn't an issue. youngstructural, I agree with your points.  In my case, your points 2&3 aren't an issue. The walls I designed are site retaining walls to 4' max retaining and are based on half stresses; however, the owner employs a full time special inspector so In my judgement felt this wouldn't be a big problem.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources