×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

(OP)
We are looking for the correct means of measuring vibration in terms of should the object be rigidly mounted or can it sit on a foam pad.
The objects are either small psc motors (42, 48 frame) or motor/blower wheel assemblies.  Based on different person's experiences, we debate on whether the object should be rigidly secured (ideally like in the end application, which isn't always possible) or if sitting it on a foam pad is acceptable.  
Doing relative measurements (motor 1 vs motor 2) I suppose it doesn't matter, but to trouble shoot issues or establish a repeatable baseline measurement I would think it does.
I'd like to get some other people's experience plus reference to standards that are clear.  I say clear because anything that seems to reference NEMA motor frame sizes and test methodology get a little wishy washy in these frame sizes.

RE: Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

I'd prefer to see it mounted as it is used, but that implies that you have some control over the details of installation.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

I agree with GregLocock.  Even if your only looking at doing a relative measurement, it provides another source of error in that the foam pad is yet another variable.  This is especially true if you have to repeat testing in the future.

 

RE: Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

Found a decent source here - www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codej/codejx/Vibration_Spec.doc
based on the GM spec.
It has some rules as to what resiliently mounted motor really means, and how to do it, and what reasonable tolerances might be.
About the only danger is if the final as-used mounting has resonances, in which case good motors will act badly, but no test system can prevent that.

RE: Rigid vs floating vibration measurement

I'm not sure what you mean about NEMA being wishy-washy, it is very clear.  NEMA MG-1 says you can test resliently mounted or rigidly mounted.  They define resilient and rigidly mounted and they give different limits for each case (0.12 ips for resiliently mounted and 0.15 ips for rigidly mounted).

I agree with the above comments that as a user, you want to see it mounted as close as possible to the way it's going to be used.

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources