×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Non-Circular Vessel Design

Non-Circular Vessel Design

Non-Circular Vessel Design

(OP)
hello,

I am looking for a method to design flat plates under low pressure and some accelerations.  The shapes do not fall within the scope of App. 13 in SC 8-1.  One shape has an elliptical cross-section, the other is hopper like with an inverted pyramid shape attached to the bottom of a cube shape.  The pressures, materials, and inert nature of the contents do not justify the expense of FEA.  Any suggestions on a reference?  Or just sweat it out with Roark?

Thanks in advance

RE: Non-Circular Vessel Design

"Sweat it out with Roark" sounds like a good approach.  Actually, you can make some conservative assumptions and check the results- if the results show it's okay, you're all set.  If the results are unreasonable, then you know you need to go into more detail.

For example- on ellipse, perhaps consider checking as a circle with both the major and minor diameters, and figure you're results ought to be in between there.  For a triangle, figure it ought to be stronger than a square with those dimensions.  (assuming triangles and ellipses aren't in there, which they may be).

If you get someone really familiar with FEA, they could probably whip up a flat-plate design of arbitrary shape fairly quickly- about the easiest problem that could be done with FEA.

RE: Non-Circular Vessel Design

Well JStephen, the elliptical section would be calculated based onto the major diameter, as the hoop stress is maximum there (and is easily calculated as Pa/t, a being the major semiaxis). However bending stresses also exist, they cannot be neglected as they are primary, and if I recall correctly they are maximum exactly at the major diameter. Roark does not seem to have the formula for this, but I think that it can be found on the net(a few years ago I had it, but can't find anymore).
Otherwise I concur with the reference to Roark. If the budget does not allow for FEA, then it is also possible to adopt ample margins based onto a rough analysis, and be prepared to add some stiffeners after hydrotest.

prex

http://www.xcalcs.com
Online tools for structural design

RE: Non-Circular Vessel Design

(OP)
JStephen and Prex,

Thank you both.

RE: Non-Circular Vessel Design

(OP)
Thanks Arto

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources