US Customary vs. metric units
US Customary vs. metric units
(OP)
What's the common wisdom for dealing with a project designed in the US, using feet, inches, and fractions of inches, but to be fabricated elsewhere in the rest of the world where a decimal system is used? What is likely to lead to the least error--translating all the shop drawings into metric ones, or trying to teach the workers how to deal with the arcane US system? (Let's skip the first obvious solution, teaching the wisdom of the SI to the arcane US designers.)
Hg
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376






RE: US Customary vs. metric units
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
I'll first put my answer in context: I am a Canadian, born, raised and trained. We are forced by the wisdom of our neighbours to be fluent in the Imperial system (we never adopted the US version), and by Canadian law to be fluent in the Metric system. We're probably the only country where assignments in virtually every course through an engineering degree are 50% metric, 50% imperial. I'm not kidding...
When I design something, my frist decision is Metric or Imperial, and then everything follows. Occationally there is cause to change the units on a set of drawings, and I WILL NOT do this by hand. I finalize the drawings and specifications in CAD and then have the computer convert. I only do a check by hand. I DO NOT round or "clean up" the resulting units. 1/2" becomes 12.7mm and stays that way. It's a pain for the shops and on site, but in Canada they are fairly used to it. They complain, but get the job done correctly.
Going overseas is a unique problem for the US system. I live and work in Christchurch, New Zealand now, and the young engineers I work alongside do not know anything about the system. They have an understanding of feet and inches (a great deal of the world still uses them for height), but NONE for forces, loads or stresses of any kind. Slugs are bugs here, nothing more.
If you want my advice, bearing in mind the above, you should find out if the destination country has a recent imperial tradition (30year or less) or made the change to Metric early. If they made the transition early, you will HAVE to change. There just won't be any capacity for working with your plans and specs in that country. Otherwise, leave them and deal with issues slowly and carefully, one by one.
Either way, you must CLEARLY label your drawings as imperial. The rest of the world doesn't even bother marking a unit on drawings... It's all automatically mm, unless otherwise indicated. So otherwise indicate. Everywhere.
One more thing: Talk to a construction lawyer in the destination country. You may not actually have a choice: It may well be illegal (for good reason!) to issue drawings in any system other than Metric. That's actually fairly common around the world...
Good luck,
YS
B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
U.S. engineering classes also give the homework problems about 50/50. At least they did a few years ago. On the other hand, the metrication movement for civil engineering projects seems to have died a thorough death; a number of standards that had briefly been issued in metric versions have now reverted.
I like the idea of having the CAD program do the conversion at the end after everything is done. That sounds like the safest way to go.
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
--------------------
How much do YOU owe?
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
--------------------
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
I'm thinking about steel projects primarily. Steel can be cut to any length. Plate thicknesses might be touchier, but I believe non-U.S. steel products are already used for domestically fabricated projects with U.S. customary units as it is; the U.S. market is big enough for the mills to bother with our silly units.
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
Rentapen (product designer)
Rentapen (floor sweeper)
Until all the machine shops and factories in the USA start using new machine tools with metric readouts etc. the USA will use inch. I can not design a special machine or product that will be made in the USA with pre 70's equipment in metric. Now if the job will be made in Japan or Germany or in a shop with all new CNC centers then yes I'll do it in metric, it isn't hard, inch metric soft-inch hard-inch whatever. Its the guys who's finally using it. I am not going to go metric and sent it to another 50 year old using a 60's knee-port to make my detail if he has to figure out dim's.
chow or lunch or whatever
just wandering
rentapen
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
The real pain in the a.. regarding metric comes when the contractor's shop drawings are submitted. That slick, metric design you did, especially those striking, crisp plans, including the notes with concrete strength in MPa, and the steel beams with designations like "W840 X 527," not to mention having all your measurements in mm... is rendered null and void because the contractor converted everything to Imperial/US units and thumbs his nose at your metric system... And the Project Manager won't side with you on getting the contractor to submit in metric because it would take too much time, despite what the contract might say.
My advice: create two sets of plans, one in metric and one in Imperial/US. This isn't hard to do at all: set up two dimension levels in the CAD files, one for metric, one for US. If you send out the metric set and get back a bunch of shop drawings in US, you'll be able to rapidly check the shops AND you'll have time to argue with the PM about dining the contractor for not following the contract.
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
If you're the engineer, shop drawings have to be prepared to your satisfaction. It might not go quickly, but it's not going anywhere without your approval.
My own experience has been like a pendulum. For about 8 years, Florida adopted the metric system for FDOT work. I even worked on a few, very s-l-o-w projects that started in imperial units, were converted to metric and then had to be converted BACK to imperial units.
Personally, I found the metric system more rational to use. Either is fine; it's the conversions that cause problems. (Just ask JPL re: Martian orbiters). Using software like MathCAD might help you double-check your conversions.
Good luck with your project! RAF
RE: US Customary vs. metric units
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376
RE: US Customary vs. metric units