Transformer Winding Costruction
Transformer Winding Costruction
(OP)
A transformer designer has suggested to me that a disc winding is mechanically superior to a sheet (foil) winding. Any comments thoughts?
In reference, we experienced a 13MVA rectifier transformer failure, apparently due to failure of the low voltage due to mechanical stress between layers. We are looking at buying a spare set of coils for the six other transformers should another failure occur. Our choice is now to stick with the sheet design with nomex for more insulation strength, or switch over to a redisgned disc winding. (The load is approx 150% for 3 minutes every five minutes)
In reference, we experienced a 13MVA rectifier transformer failure, apparently due to failure of the low voltage due to mechanical stress between layers. We are looking at buying a spare set of coils for the six other transformers should another failure occur. Our choice is now to stick with the sheet design with nomex for more insulation strength, or switch over to a redisgned disc winding. (The load is approx 150% for 3 minutes every five minutes)






RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
stronger than "sheet" (or layer), and will move much less
after/during faults.
Definitely specifiy "helical" or disk windings.
The (square) copper conductor is wrapped in a cellulose insulation (much like an insulated cable), which is then wound helically around cardboard forms, with cellulose spacers keeping the windings separated from one
another.
The sheet winding is where a flat copper or aluminun sheet
is sandwiched between epoxy-impregnated insulation, and wrapped concentrically (one winding on top of another), until
the desired ratio is achieved. Commercial (2500 KVA and below) and residential transformers use sheet winding.
There are a few manufacturers that employ the helical wind, namely Waukesha Electric Systems, Delta-Star, and Sunbelt.
In fact, it might be wise to even specify a maximum %Z
change after fault, and ask for certified test results
along with bid price, otherwise you won't have a leg to stand
on when you reject a low bidder (the sheet" wound).
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
In a helical winding, each stack is a single turn (usually with multiple conductors per turn). When it is wound, the stack of conductors are wrapped around the cylinder with spacers between each turn. Think of it as a spring with space between coils. The only change in conductor alignment is for transpositions.
In a disk winding, each stack, usually called a section, is made up of two or more turns. Sections are connected by alternating inside (close to cylinder) and outside crossovers. A cross section would look something this
x xxxx x
x x x x
xxxx xxxx
They are generally stronger with respect to short circuit strength than sheet windings.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
based on info passed down by various manufacturers. Good
info!
Gordonl: The change in impedance after a short circuit
test is (I recall) called out once in the ANSI C57 specs.
The ANSI specification is pretty "loose", to make room
for the sheet wound manufacturers.
The disk-wound (jnims) and/or helical-wound, if the
design has been short circuit tested, will have (should
have) a small change in impedance, after the fault. The
change in impedance is a result of winding movement.
Ideally, one would like to know exactly how and where the
windings moved during the fault. It's better to equate
these movements to changes in impedance.
The difference (before and after fault) may be provided
in the short circuit test report--you'll have to specifically
request this in your bid specs.
The Waukesha Electric Systems' Wisconsin factory has
performed these expensive short circuit tests on several occasions, and will provide you with these test results.
Their tests indicate the impedance changes less than 0.5%!!
I entertained one bidder who exlaimed "Our 5% change in impedance is pretty good!"
I have had my share of 'lemons' in the past, and therefore
I wrote my specs. to make certain I would be purchasing
the strongest units money would buy, since electricity
is a critical infrastructure, and equipment failure
is a possibility.
In my opinion, a substation class transformer should perform
flawlessly (with PM, of course) for at least 30 years, and observing how manufacturers are turning 'durable' goods into
'less durable' to save money is troubling, especially in
power apparatus, prompting me to tighten my requirements.
This may not be possible in the warmer regions in our country, since insulation age is determined by the heating
it undergoes.
I would like to know who, if anyone has utilized DuPont's NOMEX, which has an exceptional heat tolerance, which I beleive would make it immortal, as far as lifetime.
I specified NOMEX some years ago, and quoted price was
beyond affordability.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
a copy of my bid specs......just say the word.
I also know that some 'used' transformer shops have a
nasty habit of not performing impulse or doble testing, even
though it was specified.
We had to make prior arrangement with one such shop, to make
certain the impulse & doble tests were performed before
we got stuck with the unit.
Guess what? The used unit we bought failed the impulse test, resulting in the shop having to untank and rewind the
transformer. Not to worry.....the transformer failed the test in the factory, not on the pad. We even inspect our
bucket trucks in the factory setting, before we take delivery.
You probably are going to have to witness all factory testing
from now on, prior to shipping.
NOMEX (like all DuPont products) is patented, but I am wondering when the patent will expire, and maybe the
price will become more reasonable.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
There is also a type of transformer-design where disc-wound coils of primary and secondary are interleaved. This one is absolutly the best regarding short-circuit ruggedness, but very expensive to manufacture, difficult to cool and only used rarely today.
In German the terms are:
"Scheiben-Spule" (disc coil)for the design described in this thread
and
"Scheiben-Wicklung" (disc winding)for the design with the interleaved primary and secondary
I do not know if the terms translate word by word and unfortunatly I don not have an English Textbook at hand but I can recommend the following:
Karsai, Kerenyi, Kiss: Large Power Transformers (1987)
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Thanks for adding to the discussion. All of my limited design experience is with medium power transformers, is based on one manufacturer's practices and is getting pretty dated. I have never seen an interleaved winding, but have heard of its use.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I encourage everyone to become a Doble Engineering client, and submit reports of failed transformers to Doble.
I read a Doble newsletter, briefly discussing a client's
report of a failed impulse test at Delta-Star's Virginia
facility. It's good to know such things, especially
when Delta-Star may be low bidder.
I've heard about interleaved windings, but don't know
of any major manufacturer using them in the U.S., except
Howard in Louisiana (cannot confirm this....salesmen
have nasty habit of lying).
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I would appreciate your specs, my email is:
gmlees@algoma.com
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Let me comment just to the point ie what is the best winding type for the LV of the said rectifier trf?
You have to check with the manufacturer of the unit as he only knows the space available.
The relative strength of the winding to with stand short circuit forces arising from fault currents:
sheet(foil)winding is the best ,disc wind next.
helical and layer wdgs are relatively weaker from short circuit withstand strength angle.
There is no need for nomex insulation unless the temp rises are abnormal.Nomex will not help the trf in short circuit strength but prevent inter layer insulation failure from temp over run . The designer can easily check these points.
Dont worry about the change in %impedance.You need not check this after every fault. This is an indication of the shift in winding from short circuit forces .IEC gives the limiting values and this is checked when the trfs are subjected to special test viz short circuit test ie applying full voltage on HV terminals with LV shorted for a duration of 0.25 seconds
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Does anyone know of article/s which compare winding construction?
I think SphBoy had a good point in using %Z change of equal units as a comparison of winding design strength.
Thanks to all, much appreciated.
Gord
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Beside the type of winding design (sheet or disc or whatelse) there are several other important factors in transformer design which are crucial for the short-circuit-performance of a transformer. See the book recommended in my post dated Feb 5th. So you can have designs with good or with poor behavior for all types of winding design.
I have to diagree with dpc: A significant change in impedance is the sign of mechanical changes in the transformer and a transformer showing significnat change in impedance has already gone half the way of being scrapped. Of course, on transformer which is deemed to be of good design its not necessary to check impedance after the transformer was subjected to a short circuit, but on a transformer where this is in doubt its a good idea to check the impedance after a fault.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I am not sure whether Nomex(aramide paper) is superior in physical properties to normal cellulose kraft paper.
Pl see IEEE transactions on Power DeliveryVol 9 No.4 Octo 1994 pages 1892-1906"Background information onHigh Temperature insulation for Liquid immersed Power Trfs-Working group"where properties of Nomex and cellulose are compared.
Tensile strength as per ASTM D-828 Machine Direction :
2 mil cellulose paper- 30 psi
2 mil aramide paper -25 psi
So tensile strength of Nomex is less than calendered Kraft paper.
To increase the interlaminar strength of sheet winding ,a
better or cost effective way may be to use epoxy resin coated kraft paper which will make the entire winding solid block preventing relative movement between layers,increasing mechanical strength etc. I fully agree with elecrticuwe the strength of winding depends on the expertise of designer and quality of manufacturing and processing .So a disc winding also can be made equally effective in short circuit withstand srength by proper design.A good designer will be trying to reduce the mechanical forces from fault current rather than build on the force with stand strength.
But generally a sheet winding has better short circuit withstand strength than a disc winding except for axial compressive forces.
The case presented by gordonol : it seems the failure is not due to fault currents and the frequent over loads cannot cause much forces compared to fault currents.Probably edge preparation ,less thickness of interlaminar insulation etc can also create problem.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
For a detailed study on short circuit performance of trfs the following classic books may be of use:
1)Short Circuit Duty of Power Trfs-Giorgio Bertagnolli,1996-ABB Transformatori,Leganano,Milano,Italy.
2) Waters.M-The Short circuit Strength of Power trfs-Macdonald&co,London 1966.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
My observation that this will not be of not much relevance is with respect to the specific case thatwe were discussing ,based on my limited experience with trfs. This test and interpretation are explained in two IEEE stds:
1)C57.125-1991,Appendix A ,page 39
2) IEEE std 62-1995 Guide for Diagnostic field testing of Electric Power Apparatus-part1 oil filled Power Trfs
clause6.1.4.8 "a change in the short circuit impedance of trf indicates a possible winding movement with in the trf.Since the overall measurement accuracy is no better than 1%,using 0.5% accuracy meters, changes of +,- 2%of impedance are not considered significant.Changes of more than +,-3% of impedance should be considered as significant"
The problem is in normal trfs such a degree of variation will occur with substantial distortion/relative movement of windings(not with the type of relative movement that we saw in trf under discussion)viz buckling of inner winding,axial displacement between HV &LV windings.In field, trfs used to trip much ahead of such situation getting developed.If any one can narrate thier experience of this test as a diagnostic test to detect incipient fault,it will be helpful,except of course as a means to check damage during transportation of trf from works to site.
Specifying short circuit test in bid spec:Utilities in Europe and esp in Indian sub continent do specify such test as a special test in trfs subjected to frequent short circuits eg Traction supply trfs,furnace trfs etc. The problem is manufacturers will not have facility to do this test and trf has to be taken to special labs for test (KEMA,CESSI ,CPRI etc) Test cost is also high ,almost 20-60% of trf cost.For details see IEC 60076-5(2000)
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Thank You for all of your help. Before going with the nomex I took a piece of each and ripped them, the nomex was harder to rip than the kraft. We did use, as did the original design, epoxy coated kraft paper, as well adding epoxy to the nomex. I beleive the movement was radial, as you pointed out the sheet was quite strong axially because of the epoxy.
prc, are you suggesting the redesign stick to sheet? The original design had no gap between sheets, for the rewind we used a small gap between sheets, and we instructed the winders to watch the edge of the strip as they wound. We could stick to the mods, but I'm going to need to do some research and maybe put the question to the designer again if he beleives the disc would be superior for this application.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I have to confess that I dont have experience with sheet windings.But from all the discussions ,I conclude a failure mode as below.
The LV winding is inner most and as the load fluctuate violently and with short durations the winding experiences a pulsating buckling force towards the core.This must be causing the damage to the interlaminar insulation. Under the situation I would suggest to go for the disc winding if your designer is confident.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Nomex is good in usage as the temperature withstand properties of the same are better than cellulose paper. But thermally aged cellulose papers are also available and asre definitely cheaper than nomex, an option can be excrcised.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
short circuit tests!
Waukesha Electric performed no less than
three (3) short circuit tests on their disk
wound units. Change in impedance consistantly
less than 0.3% after fault.
Every sheet wound unit short circuit test I examined had an impedance change of 1.5% or greater.
Sheet wound is better than disk? Show me a certified short
circuit test and I will believe it!
Even the rebuilders (Sunbelt) will tell you this too!
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
The pudding can taste bad not because of ingredients but also due to cooking!
I reiterate sheet windings should be stronger from short circuit strength angle but it can be disastrous if not properly made or processed.Test results; short circuit results are tricky ,the type of results can come if the windings relatively move axially evenif windings are Ok. So I think from the results reported one cannot conclude one winding or other is superior.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
If a transformer is expected to work reliable the windings shouldn't move much during a short circuit.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
If so, I would like to get a copy of Siemen's
transformer specs (10 MVA and greater).
Years ago, I evaluated a Siemens (German) unit,
and it was a fine piece of equipment.
The Germans usually have some of the best equipment
money can buy.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I fully agree with your statement that the windings should not move.But the point I want to make was even if the windings are strong and ok windings can shift due to poor design /manufacturing.I was only emphasizing the statement made in your earlier posting of 7th Feb first para.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Yes, I'm in Germany, but I'm not with Siemens or buy or sell transformers from/to them. So, unfortunately, I do not have access to their transformer specs.
Thank you very much for recognizing the merits of Germans in Engineering.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
They usually don't miss a beat on anything,
and are quite ingenious, particularly in SF6
insulated substations.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I would like to know about circulating currents in helical type winding. I am also curious to know that if u place regulating winding outside high voltage winding with a single layer what problems may arise. Hope somebody has the answer !
Electrans
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
you will not have a circulating current if you have one single conductor. If you need larger cross sections you have to use transposed conductors or provide suitable transposing by other means.
With the regulating winding outside you will incrase losses due to radial components of magnetic field.
See: Kerenyi, Karsai, Kiss: "Large Power Transformers" for detailed analysis on that topic
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Single layer regulating winding outside the HV winding is the best method of winding construction from cost and performance angle.Since being away from the main leakage field, stray losses and short circuit forces in reg winding will be minimum in such a construction.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
you are right with the losses in the regulating winding, but additional losses are induced in the main winding.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
Can you pl explain a little more.I dont understand how additional losses occur in main wdg.If you are refering to Karsai,pl mention the page no too.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
with a regulating winding,at least for some tap positions, regardless where it is placed in a nearly every possible winding design you will cause a magnetic flux density directed in an other direction as the main stray flux. This will cause additional losses since the conductor shape is usually choosen according to the direction of the main stray flux direction.
I usually try to avoid regulating windings when specifying converter transformers, which is usually possible because the converter can be designed to do the regulation.
My main job is the design of converters. I only have to dig in the transformer details from time to time if we have failures of converter transfomers. Since the Karsai book is quite expensive (>250$) I do not have one at home but I borrow it from the next univerity library.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I am sorry to differ with you. I asked for Karsai page thinking that there is any reference in it .Of course losses will be more than the case with out tappings. But when tappings are provided ,Outermost tappings give least stray losses in windings.If you can explain ,I am ready to correct myself.
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
you may be correct as long as you restrict your design to the standard design of winding one conductor as a helical coil.
One example to manufacture a regulating winding causing lower additional stray losses than the standard arrangement regardless where it is placed:
Wind several strands of wire in parallel and connect them in series. Flux density will be more uniform resulting in lower losses
RE: Transformer Winding Costruction
I would appreciate a copy of your transformer spec and bid sheets when you get a chance, my email is:
rterickson@tid.org
Thanks ~ Randy