×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

(OP)
What is the reason for the US to use the circular (MHO) in impedance protection relays, when all the research is in the direction of the quadrilateral characteristic?
Is there any technical advantage in using MHO compared to quadrilateral?
I am confused. I see now a lot of numerical relays offering MHO characteristic. If we go back to the 90's, everybody wanted to have quadrilateral.
It is just culture or there are some technical benefits?

RE: Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

From what I understand, the Mho is a simpler calculation for a relay to perform so the relay operating time is faster.

The downside is less fault coverage for high resistance faults.

Mhos are also easier to set and test.

RE: Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

(OP)
From my uderstanding:
the fault resistance coverage close to the reactive reach setting (80% of line for instance) is almost zero...  If you want to increase it, you have to íncrease the reactive reach (go to 90% of the line), risking your relay to overreach...
Is that worth a faster trip time?
By the way, how fast can be a numerical mho relay (with deírectional detection)? I have no idea...

RE: Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

You are correct - it will be zero at the reach point. A fault at this point is either covered by Zone 2, or some sort of channel aided scheme or DEF scheme.
You could increase the zone 1 reach, however this means you have no resistive reach at 90% of the line - as well as having the issues with possible overreach you mentioned.
Sub-cycle operating times are possible with numerical distance protection relays. Off the top of my head, the LFRZ and P443 relays from Areva offer this, and they are both Mho.
Our organisation uses mho - mainly for historical reasons and because they are easier to set and test, rather than from any operation time perspective.
I have just heard from manufacturers that the only way to get the fast times is to use mho.
Whether or not it is worth it is a question you are best to answer yourself.

RE: Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

PS - please note there is no directional decision required with a mho - the characteristic is inherently directional (one of those speed advantages I guess !!)

RE: Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

(OP)
I have received the following answers from some colleagues:

1) the small resistive reach at the end of the settings is not an issue. High resistive faults are covered by blocking scheme or permissive overreaching scheme based on directional earth-fault protection (this is what DiscoP said by the way...).

2) directionality is needed also for mho characeristic (directionality is a difficult item: if you have aclose-in fault the fault voltages drop and it's difficult to understand the fault direction. Digital relays use memory voltage for that.

I have also been told that US market  is looking with interest into the quadrilateral characteristic...



RE: Circular or quadrilateral impedance characteristic?

If you need some further information on how the Mho is inherently directional (ie a separate directional decision is not required), there are a number of protection text books that discuss this.

Two on my bookshelf that are also available on the web are

GE's "The Art & Science of Protective Relaying" by C Russell Mason" - see Chapter 4 'Mho Type Distance Relay'

also

Areva's "Network Protection & Automation Guide" - see chapter 11 section 11.7.3

Both books also deal with how relays cope with close-up faults.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources