×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

(OP)
Hey brothers and sisters,

I have a question regarding the Handrail extentions called out in the IBC 2003 1009.11.5
I'm a structural engineer working for the contactor in this case, and the Design Engineer is insisting on these 2 ft handrail extentions in an purely Industrial building.  These extentions are not practical, yet there are no exceptions in the code.  
OSHA does not require these extentions in there "fixed industrial stair spec".  
Since I am not a member of ICC I can not get a code interpratation, you got to pay for that.
Anybody out there run into this?

Also I'd like some clarification on the 7" riser and 11" tread requirement, again there is no exception for Industrial, yet OSHA has a range for riser and tread dimensions way outside this.

It seems common sense to me, IBC needs to add these excepetions.  These requirment are clearly not intended to industial, platforms, catwalks and the like, but for "means of egress" only



RE: IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

If your building is an industrial type facility in where the public has no access, you can use OSHA to design your stairs.  The rise/run criteria is a lot looser as well as the guardrail spacing requirements.  Just be sure that your building official knows that you are NOT designing using the IBC.

RE: IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

Both the top and botttom handrail extensions and the 7" max riser / 11" min tread are required for IBC industrial stairs.  The extensions are 12" horizontal at the top and sloped (same as stair) for one projected tread depth (i.e. 11" or more) the bottom.  Your best bet is as minorchord proposes.  Check with your code official to see if you can get by with using only OHSA and not using IBC.

RE: IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

Notice first off that Chapter 10 of IBC is dealing entirely with egress from buildings.  If your stair falls under this classification, and IBC design is required, then you're stuck.  But if your stair is not used for egress from buildings, then this entire chapter is not applicable to your case.

Even so, my IBC 2003 shows a 12" extension in this section, not 2'.

RE: IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

(OP)
Thanks,
You are right it is 12" per 1009.11.5.
And I agree with your reference to "means of egress"

The part that leads to some confusion is in 1607.7.1 were they list load exeption for Group F (Factory and Industrial) I would think they could do the same in Chapter 10.  But I guess, like you said it is implied because mech access stairs are not "means of egress"

thanks for the imput.  

I just would like something official, because this comes up alot when you deal with professionals that have mostly commercial/residential experience.

I also had a local plan reviewer flag the same thing on a mechanical access platform.  He even quoted the IBC chapter 10.

RE: IBC Handrail Extentions for Industial Stairs ?????

Under IBC Equipment Platforms and the components that access them are basically considered part of the equipment.  Therefore, the components that access the equipment platform are non-means of egress.  Refer to section 505.5 of IBC.  Thus, anything such as a OHSA stair, a ladder or alternting tread stair can be used to access the equipment platform.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources