×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CDU Hot Preheat Train Fouling

CDU Hot Preheat Train Fouling

CDU Hot Preheat Train Fouling

(OP)
From the first start-up of Crude Unit, heat exchangers in the so-called "hot preheat train" (upstream of process heater) experience intensive and very progressive fouling. In these exchangers, crude is placed on the shellside, while atmospheric residue flows through the tubes.
Since in all other heat exchangers in CDU crude is placed on the tubeside, I wonder why the designer had choosen this configuration in hot preheat train.

Atmospheric residue does not have any hydraulic demands - it has sufficient pressure head to overcome all resistances before entering vacuum unit feed drum. Even if it was placed on the shellside instead of crude oil, for the given fouling rate, calculations show that we could easilly achieve 4 year run-length without shutting down the unit and cleaning the exchangers - as far as process hydraulic is concerned.
So my question is: what if we change flow pattern through these exchangers and place the crude oil on the tubeside? The initial pressure drop through the hot preheat train, in such case, would be higher, but I think the rate of fouling will be much much lower, because of velocity profile; so when the terminal tube velocity is reached, no significant fouling cannot take place.
Process heater is available to deliver additional duty if heat transfer rate drops (for crude deltaT = 25C = start of run - end of run), because of fouling from the atmospheric residue side.

In most of crude units, crude oil is placed on the shell side (in the hot preheat train), and they all suffer from the same disease: crude heater inlet pass vaporization, caused by big pressure drop through the train. So why, then, all designers always place the crude oil on the shellside? And what about switching flow configuration?

Thank you in advance.

RE: CDU Hot Preheat Train Fouling

Although I wasn't involved in this kind of designs, I pressume there may be other valid factors, apart from logical ΔP reasons.

Among these one may ponder (abnormal?) process conditions such as, for example, high (naphthenic acidity) TAN numbers, water carryover from the desalters, slop oil injection, etc., the effects of which may dictate putting the crude oil through the shellside, although not necessarily for the same considerations.

Besides, vaporization is frequently suppressed with suitably designed control valves to provide sufficient back-pressure in particular when using parallel heater passes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources