×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

289 compared to a 351W

289 compared to a 351W

289 compared to a 351W

(OP)
Anyone know the physical size difference between a 289 and 351W? Any idea if the engine mounts are close enough so a 351W can be swapped? Must I use an adaptor plate between a 351W and a c4 transmission?  Thanks.   

RE: 289 compared to a 351W

I am not a Ford specialist, but as far as I know all Windsors share most external dimensions. The variable dimension is deck height with longer stroke engines having a taller block or greater distance from the crank centre line axis to the deck of the block.

Cleavland blocks are completely different to Windsor blocks, even if they have the same stroke.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: 289 compared to a 351W

Right-o Pat... the 289 has an 8.2" deck height and the Windsor is 9.5". As you can imagine raising the cylinder heads up and out creates a much larger engine so hood clearance and exhaust to shock tower clearance are two issues to be concerned with.

RE: 289 compared to a 351W

This is right guys. The other problem with swapping windsor blocks is that pre Nov 1965 289 blocks have a 5 bolt bell housing pattern and this will not bolt up to a C4 transmission. Post '65 blocks have 6 bolt bell housings for all 289, 302 and 351. 351 cleveland blocks also use the same engine mount locations and 6 bolt bell housing dimensions. C4 transmissions have large and small diameter bell housings. The bolt patterns are the same but the drive plates also change diameter according to the bell housing.

Regards,

Ray

RE: 289 compared to a 351W

And in addition to the above the 351W is around 50lbs heavier. A fair chunk of weight.

Depending where in the world you are buying a 347ci kit would be a better option and allow you to retain most of what you already have. Designed for putting in a 302 I can't see any reason it won't go in a 289. The 289 is supposed to have bores that don't extend down into the crankcase as far as a 302, but with the 5.4" rod kit that still places the piston .110" higher in the bore at BDC anyway.

The kit's reasnoably priced if you're in the states, but costly outside.

The Cleveland shares ALL the critical dims with the later Windsors (mounts & B/housing), being Windsor derived. It has a 9.2" deck height and a cast extension on the front.

Hope this helps, John.

"It's not always a case of learning more, but often of forgetting less"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources