×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

(OP)
A detailed failure analysis of a 0.063" thick by 0.7" wide 17-7PH (Condition TH1050) flat torsion spring revealed two contributing factors: (1) scattered massive TiC particles that fractured, probably during cold reduction, leaving splits in the adjacent sound material; and (2) nearly continuous linear bands of ferrite, especially at the mid-thickness.
So my question: Is there any existing specification for 17-7PH that limits or even addresses the number or frequency or sizes of carbides?

RE: massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

I am not aware of any consensus standard (SAE, ASTM, ISO, etc.) that addresses the number or frequency or size of carbides in a precipitation hardening grade of stainless steel such as 17-7 (Type 631).  This type of detail is usually agreed upon in a customer standard that is unique to the application.  For example, large spring vendor Torsion Spring Co. has their own internal standard that generally references SAE, DIN, etc. standards, but then specifically addresses microstructure requirements, variation in tensile properties in a coil, etc.  You will need to work with your material vendor in order to address this issue.

RE: massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

In my working with strip material, this is not a common situation.  Was this material re-heattreated?
As you will see in another post, ferrite in 17-7 is an ongoing issue.  The carbides are a different story.  The make me suspicios of the thermomechanical history of this material.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

Tagging on to EdStainless'spost we had a incident where some 17/7 parts inadvertently cycled 24/7 for 2+ months in a pyrolysis furnace. The temperature cycles as followes; charged at RT heated to 670F held for 10-12 hrs then raised to 900F-925F for 6-8 hrs. then back to RT.
Though we use a similar furnace to clean PH parts the time at temperature per heat cycle in this furnace was 3+ times as long as a normal cleaning cycle.
When the parts were recovered they were put back into routine service. Two of the four components failed, threads stripping, during the initial assembly. The other two components were loss in the system. There is a possibility the two others might be 17/4 or 455.

Metallurgical examination of one failed component revealed very large carbides. The failure mode was quasi-cleavage originated from some surface breaking carbides. There were some other carbides with incipient cracking.

RE: massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

Knowing the kinetics, I would guess that there is some residual primary MC in every piece of 17-7.  Long term exposure at 900F would sure be enough for these to grow.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

metldude,

Do you know which mill the material came from?  We are doing an ongoing failure analysis investigation for .032" 17-7 in the TH1050 condition.  We had high carbon content on one such failure.  Anything else you care to share? We are dealing with a high hardness issue as well (parts measured as high as HRC 47).

RE: massive carbides in 17-7PH stainless steel

metldude,

Since Ti is an excellent carbide former I would guess that every 17-7 spring will have TiC carbides. If the TiC carbides were round and not elongated through the grain boundaries you shouldn't have abnormal mechanical issues. Remember its better that you form TiC carbides rather than Cr23C6 because we all know what that leads to. The continuous linear bands of ferrite are what troubles me are the delta ferrite stringers you are seeing. These phases form during solidification due to segregation of alloying elements such as chrome, which extends the delta ferrite field to lower temperatures. This phase is known to be problem because its britte and forms elongated phases. heat treatment can help dissolve this phase.

Regards

Matlsguy

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources