Pump hystersis!
Pump hystersis!
(OP)
Hello to All Pump specialists,
We are on a mining project, and the site is filled with water. We have to dewater the site before mining by drilling wells and installing deepwell pumps. We started a one-pump dewatering test, and we have experienced a very funny behavior that we cannot explain:
As we ramp up the VFD that is driving the pump, we increase pump capacity. Everything was working fine until we reached a frequency of about 40Hz. At 40 Hz, our capacity was up to 3000 m3/hr. after we increase beyond 40 Hz, pump capacity starts to drop. This 3000 peak limit is 500 m3/hr less then the pump vendor designed the peak for (peak should be 3500).
When the decrease in pump performance unexpectedly occurred as we kept increasing the frequency, we decided to repeat the test. At the repeat, same thing happened at 40 Hz, so we decided to decrease the frequency. HOWEVER, as we decreased the frequency, the pump capacity never recovered to the same flows as before. If you envision a plot of flow (y-axis) vs. frequency (x axis), you get a hysteresis curve, where flow goes up until it reaches (40Hz,3000m3/hr), and then loops back to the origin with a different curve path (lower flows).
When we switch off the pump and repeat the test, we get the same hysteresis again as we ramp the frequency up and back down.
The well is 240 meters deep, so the pump is well beyond the 40m minimum submergence needed. We ensured there is no blockage. We checked all these factors to see if cavitation is the problem, and found nothing. Even if it was NPSH, usually when cavitation happens the pump is expected to operate normally when you ramp back down. This hysteresis behavior is unexplainable at the moment. We tested the discharge during the test to see fines/particle effects. All solids were fine particles that are within acceptable limits.
Can anyone exlpain the hysteresis? and why we experience premature peak flow?
We are on a mining project, and the site is filled with water. We have to dewater the site before mining by drilling wells and installing deepwell pumps. We started a one-pump dewatering test, and we have experienced a very funny behavior that we cannot explain:
As we ramp up the VFD that is driving the pump, we increase pump capacity. Everything was working fine until we reached a frequency of about 40Hz. At 40 Hz, our capacity was up to 3000 m3/hr. after we increase beyond 40 Hz, pump capacity starts to drop. This 3000 peak limit is 500 m3/hr less then the pump vendor designed the peak for (peak should be 3500).
When the decrease in pump performance unexpectedly occurred as we kept increasing the frequency, we decided to repeat the test. At the repeat, same thing happened at 40 Hz, so we decided to decrease the frequency. HOWEVER, as we decreased the frequency, the pump capacity never recovered to the same flows as before. If you envision a plot of flow (y-axis) vs. frequency (x axis), you get a hysteresis curve, where flow goes up until it reaches (40Hz,3000m3/hr), and then loops back to the origin with a different curve path (lower flows).
When we switch off the pump and repeat the test, we get the same hysteresis again as we ramp the frequency up and back down.
The well is 240 meters deep, so the pump is well beyond the 40m minimum submergence needed. We ensured there is no blockage. We checked all these factors to see if cavitation is the problem, and found nothing. Even if it was NPSH, usually when cavitation happens the pump is expected to operate normally when you ramp back down. This hysteresis behavior is unexplainable at the moment. We tested the discharge during the test to see fines/particle effects. All solids were fine particles that are within acceptable limits.
Can anyone exlpain the hysteresis? and why we experience premature peak flow?





RE: Pump hystersis!
Just a thought
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Pump hystersis!
BigInch
-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com
RE: Pump hystersis!
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Pump hystersis!
just something to think about, is the well capable of more than 3000 m3/hr - possibly you are trying to exceed the inflow capacity to the well, this could account for the decreasing flow as you increase speed. You could be pumping to the intake level of the pump within the well and entraining air, this could explain the pumps behaviour.
Naresuan University
Phitsanulok
Thailand
RE: Pump hystersis!
BigInch
-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com
RE: Pump hystersis!
Tronical, do you observe air in the discharge when the capacity starts to fall off?
Katmar Software
Engineering & Risk Analysis Software
http://katmarsoftware.com
RE: Pump hystersis!
BigInch
-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com
RE: Pump hystersis!
What head is the pump designed for?
What pattern do you see in motor current as you increase the freq?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm
RE: Pump hystersis!
Sorry for building up your questions..had to be at site.
The pump is completely submerged in a deepwell. As soon as pump performance drops the level of the well starts to rise. The lack of intake is not an issue at all, as the pump is submerged in a deep deep well. The water table is 240m above the pump. As we pump up and reach peak (premature peak that is) flow, the level in the well dips down to about 150m (will verify not too sure). This is still way more than we need. As for the net inflow of water, water is very very abundant. We can add another 15 pumps and pump away for 15 years before we dewater the pit.
We tested for offgassing. nothing. we had valves to test for offgassing on the top of the well, and different high points along the pipeline, and we observe no offgassing nor bubbling. there is no air in the discharge.
Once the unhealthy flow pattern starts, it does not go away until the pump is completely shut off. Again, there is no air in the discharge.
BigInch your pre-rotation suggestion is yet to be looked at in detail. I obtained the paper you refered me to...just didnt get enough time to read it, but it seems like it is worthwhile.
Edstainless, we tried to ramp up quickly to 60 Hz, we still see the same problem as we exceed 40.
How do I post pictures/pdf here? I will try to post a curve on monday/tuesday when I get back to office.
RE: Pump hystersis!
1.) Upload a picture to some site like http://imagevenue.com
2.) copy the URL link for the picture that they return,
http
3.) paste the URL link into this thread box, as above
4.) add "[img " to the front of the pasted URL (no "")
5.) add "]" to the end of the pasted URL (no "")
BigInch
-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com
RE: Pump hystersis!
1. when the pump reaches its premature peak, will it maintain that flow if you maintain the 40hz speed ie, for how long have you run the pump at 40hz.
2. what is the relation between the screen diameter/well liner diameter and the pump/rising main diameters.
3. where is the well screen positioned in relation to the pump inlet.
4. what is the recovery time after stopping the pump for the water level to recover from 150 to 240 metres.
If, as you say there is enough water to keep 15 pumps running for 15 years it would be expected that with only one pump operating in a well, capable of the flow rate you are expecting, not to see any drawn-down in the well casing. Dropping the water level in the well casing by 90 meters would indicate that the inflow to the "well" is less than the pump capability.
Naresuan University
Phitsanulok
Thailand
RE: Pump hystersis!
We pulled out the pump and found rocks clogging the inlet. The rocks were all beyond 0.5 inches, which is why wee didnt see any solids in the discharge. The rocks were getting sucked in only when we had enough pressure (at 40hz), at which point they would get sucked and stuck in the inlet screen. Them getting stuck explained the premature peak flow. When they got stuck, a reduction in frequency still didnt allow the rocks to get unstuck, which explained the hysteresis. Only a complete shutdown would allow the rocks to fall off the screen, which is why we were getting essentially a carbon copy repeat-test results, and which is why when we flushed the pump and repeated, it didnt solve the problem.
The whole well is supposed to be guarded with an inlet screen to prohibit rocks greater than 0.5 inches from entering the well. Clearly somewhere a screen broke. We have not yet located the source of these rocks, but it is no longer a pump question.
Thank you all. Hopefully its an incident that you wont come across yourself, and if you do, remember this discussion!
RE: Pump hystersis!
Anyway, a good result for you and it's appreciated that you took the time to get back to us - something that doesn't always happen.
Naresuan University
Phitsanulok
Thailand
RE: Pump hystersis!
Honestly I appreciated your inputs greatly, and eitherway your inputs made me as well as others learn, even though my case was something else.
tronical
RE: Pump hystersis!
RE: Pump hystersis!
BigInch
-born in the trenches.
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com