×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

(OP)
Hello All,

When doing a Finite Element study (of a steel component for example), suppose that we have a very good mesh and a very good model, I want to know if there are safety factors related to the finite element study to measure the difference of the results in comparison of the reality?

I would like to know also if there are complete finite element studies (reports) that have served in building a real part (that exist…not just a study for “fun”) that can be seen and serve as a reference for further studies?

Best Regards.

RE: FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

Not sure what you mean with your first question but FEA remains an approximation of reality - there will be an error of some value... There are uncertainties re. material input values, actual loading conditions, etc. Typical error for a typical linear static analysis might be 3 or 5% (but it really depends upon a lot of things).

2nd question: You might want to search for so-called benchmark problems or studies. NAFEMS published studies are a good reference.

RE: FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

Reality is a strange beast. If you're referring to reality as actual measurements then they too can be subject to error and in some cases have to be interpreted to really get a real reality. There are no safety factors applied to FE models to compare with such reality. There may, however, be safety factos employed in designing a component for the 'unexpected' or worst possible case.

In industry where FE analyis is carried out you won't find out that a study has been done for 'fun', though I sometimes wonder.

corus

RE: FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

(OP)
I totally agree with you Corus that in the industry the FE studies are not done just for “f”. I’m looking for FE studies done for industrial purposes to establish a trustful methodology.

The problem of benchmarks is that they are based (the result is compared to) on theoretical/analytical calculations.

So, if a mechanical part is designed to resist a certain load and to remain ender certain displacements (deformed shape) limits by the FE methods, it will really resist or not? In some cases, was it certain surprises (not resulting from incorrect modelling, meshing…)?

RE: FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

In the auto industry it had better perform like the FEA says. And that definitely includes static stiffness.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: FE reports as reference and "Mesh safety factor"..

FE models have different uses. Sometimes they're used to compare results due to proposed changes in a design, to look at a failure, or it may be to check a new design. The main objective is to have confidence in the answers you get. In the first two cases you can compare the results with measured values before you assess the changes to a design. In the latter case you can have no measurements so the only way to be confident of the answers is to compare against theoretical values at some part of the model. To have trust in the model you need one or both of these methods of validation/verification. NAFEMS gives good guidance as to best practice in using FE, but at the end of the day it's real validation of the model you want. There can be no trustful methodology as such as each model is unique. The only methodology I use is my common sense and whether the results make sense. If I don't spot an obvious error then I'm sure the non-FE user will spot it in 2 seconds.

corus

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources