×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

(OP)
I am not am not a Mechanical but have some limited experience. All of my work is in Civil. I have been proposed a question and am seeking some professional advice.
Is a 10-foot head water test comparable to a 6 pound air test for mechanical piping? The piping is located in an underfloor area. Additionally, are there cost benefits associated with the tests?

RE: 6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

Are you asking if that puts the same pressure on the piping?

If so, the answer is that the two pressures are close but not exact.  10 feet of water head is just over 4 psi (4.3 to be more precise).

The cost benefit as I see it is to find any leaks before everything is closed up and started up.  Then, it's much more expensive to fix them.

Caution, I'm sort of a lurking process engineer so there 'may' be some code issues that I'm not familar with.

RE: 6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

There are Code issues involved here.  To which code is your system designed and built?

Thanks!
Pete
P. J. (Pete) Chandler, PE
Mechanical, Piping, Thermal, Hydraulics
Processes Unlimited International, Inc.
Bakersfield, California USA
pjchandl@prou.com

RE: 6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

Comanche1,
Suggest using water instead of air for static testing.  Should there be a defect in system or a leak, the system pressure will rapidly decrease (not cause a lot of damage to surroundings) or leaks will easily be spotted.  I know of a situation whereby a large pressure vessel was tested using nitrogen and a catastrophic failure occurred, resulting in signficant injuries to personnel and equipment.  I know this does not answer your question, but something for you to consider.
pmover

RE: 6 pound air test vs. 10 foot head water test?

A 10-15 psig air test is pretty standard for leak testing welds.  Some sort of soap solution is used and visual inspection of each "soap tested" weld will quickly determine if there are any through-wall cracks or pin holes as soap bubbles will form in the vicinity of these defects.  If leaks are found, repairs can be accomplished after depressuring the system once initial inspection has been completed.  The advantage of air-soap testing welds over filling the system with water and applying a small head to the system is that draining the water may be problematic, especially if there are no low point drains.  

Note neither of these procedures constitute a "pressure test" as required by most piping Codes.  The stress applied by either procedure is much too low compared to a 150% hydrotest or a 110% pneumatic test as required by ASME B31.3 for example.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources