×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
Hi,

I am pulsing a 1:1 pulse transformer with a 600 ns pulse and when I send 3 consecutive '1' the pulses on the output satrt to get smaller (about 350 ns). If I send 2 consecutive '1' the pulses on the output are fine. I tried putting a 1N4001 diode across the primary and secondary sides of the transformer and it didn't help. Can anyone offer any help??

Thanks,

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Hi swb1, what sort of transformer u have?? any datasheet?what type of circuit is it? .....This is the dV/dt limitation i guess....whats' yr transformer loading scenario? Can u reduce load on the output side? This will definitely help...

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
I am using a Pulse Engineering transformer PE-8272M. I have a 1N4001 diode connected across the primary and secondary sides. Cathode to pin 6 and anode to pin 4 on primary side and cathode to pin 1 and anode to pin 3 on the anode side. I also have a FET 2N3504 (drain) and 100 ohm resistor connected to pin 6 of the transformer.

Thanks,

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

If you're driving the primary unidirectionally, the third pulse may be saturating the core (DC buildup).

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
Not sure what you mean by unidirectionally?? How do I eliminate this DC buildup??

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

My guess would be you're reaching the saturation point of the chosen core.  Is your signal always 0 to 5V (or whatever max voltage you're using), or does it also swing negative (i.e., -5V)?  If you're only going from 0 to positive and back to zero, I lean even harder towards saturation.  A small schematic of the core and associated circuitry along wiht your signaling scheme would help.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Hi Swb1,
        Looking at the datasheet, the primary inductance is 200uHenry which i feel is high for operating at 600nSec i.e 1.3MHz frequency.....Adversly speaking, the FET that u;r driving , may not be switching exactly 0-5 V. The Diodes 1N4001 used are good only upto few hundered Hz and would infact distort your signal if used in even KHz range. I would start debugging 1st by using
 1) Use BAS16 or equivalent High speed Schottky diode
    for achieving free wheeling at 1.3MHz across
    transformer terminals instead of 1N4001 rectifier
    diode.
     If the above doesn't work...
 2) Use High speed MOSFETs like IRF640 or so which has very low "ON resistance" less than 0.5Ohm and has atleast 3MHz switching capability
     If this also doesn't work....
 3) Last, i would suspect the transformer. If it has Iron core, use transformer that has Ferrite core. Also check the primary and secondary inductance they should be as low as possible of the order of 10's of microhenries...

    R u using this transfomer for a specific reason??? Why not use a better Opto isolator??? Will solve all yr issues...Let us know what come out of this....thanks

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
I tried suggestion #1 and replaced the 1N4001 diode with a B0520WS (had it in house) schottky diode and there was no change. I am off to try suggestion #2.

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Can we have standard English, please. These u and r may be fun for someone. But that doesn't work here.

Regarding the pulse shape: It is what magnetic cores do when you do not give them a DC-free input signal. A free-wheeling diode does not restore zero flux and will not help. Use a DC blocking capacitor in series with the primary to avoid DC saturation. And make sure that the transformer is designed for your intended use. There are specs like uVs and risetime and so forth that must be met in order to get good results.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Hi, no cicuit presents a problem, I assume you are switching one end of the primary to ground with the other tied to supply. If thats the case then you need to remove the diodes. Use a fet with an avalance rated internal diode (irf series). Your core is saturating because the "off" volt seconds are smaller than the "on" volt seconds.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
I used the DC blocking capacitor suggested by skogsgurra and it blocked it out alright smile The input signal to the transformer was blocked out completely, so that's definately not going to work. The signals coming out of the secondary side were like 30 ns wide.

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
How would I attach a picture of the schematic??

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
I don't have a .jpg of the schematic, Its done in schema.

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

You can just do a screen capture and save it to  JPG and use a paint program to edit out the extraneous stuff from the screen.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Hi swb1,
        Your computer keyboard should have "Prt Sc" (print screen) key....Open Photo editor . Open your schematic page, click on "Prt Sc" key and then open Photo editor and from Edit manu, click on "paste as new image"....you should get the .jpg of your schematic at saved location....

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

"The input signal to the transformer was blocked out completely, so that's definately not going to work"

Oh yes. It will work. But you have to size the capacitor accordingly. Not just pick one from the drawer.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Can you increase the amplitude of the pulse?  If so, the frequency response of the transformer may be a little better.  Perhaps feed a signal generator into the transformer and see how it responds in the MHz range.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

I was expecting to get flamed for such a dumb post; so I'll do it myself:  As already mentioned above in the first posts, increasing the voltage swing can make saturation worse, not better.  This is regardless if it's a pulse transformer or not.  Although what I did notice on the bench was that a transformer can saturate differently at several different frequencies like poles of a passive filter.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

As with all non-ideal components, you have an inductance, a capacitance, and a resistance (impedance).  Throw all of that into the mix and you have a couple of poles to deal with once you hit the correct frequencies.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

I belive the transformer you are using has an ungapped core, so each time you pulse it you increase the gauss level until it reaches saturation. To use a single ended(unipolar) pulse as an input to a transformer the transformer core must have a gap to prevent saturation or a very long off-time for the core charge to bleed off.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
xfmrman, the pulse pulsing the transformer is 600ns wide and happens every 3.3 microseconds. That seems like enough time for the core charge to bleed off. Am I wrong??

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Hi swb1, yes you could be wrong. Suppose your pulse is 5v that gives you a volt time product of 600 x 5= 3000nSV during the on time. If you have a reverse recovery diode accross the transformer the time volt product is 0.6 x 2700 = 1620nSV during the off time. Under these conditions your core "charges up" with each pulse untill it saturates.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

(OP)
cbarn, so are you saying that the "on-time" should be equal to or less than the "off-time"??

thanks,

swb1

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

Hi swb1, no i didnt say that. The volt time product of the on time has to be less than the volt time product of the off time. in the worked example above it isn't and so the core would saturate.

RE: Puzzling Pulse Transformer output

cbarn is saying to not just use a reverse diode across the transformer but some type of circuit with a larger voltage drop. In lower speed applications we have used a diode and zener in series. You could do the same but they obviously have to be high speed components and I don't know what's available off-hand.

When you pulse the transformer you create a magnetic field which is basically storing some of the enery (charge the inductor). To get rid of the stored magnetic energy you have to "move" it somewhere else (discharge the inductor). Using a snubber circuit with a decent voltage drop will quickly change this energy into heat. Our zener/diode circuit has a little more voltage drop than the DC pulse does to allow a 50% duty cycle.

I hope that makes sense.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources