×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Small inexpensive separator

Small inexpensive separator

Small inexpensive separator

(OP)
Hello,

I am going to be completing a bunch of shallow gas wells soon and will have to equip them with gas/water separators.  I am not expecting much water production so I wanted to just wet meter them instead of using a separator.  But we cannot pig the pipelines in this field so wet meters are not an option.

I am looking for a small and very inexpensive separators, any ideas?

RE: Small inexpensive separator

Well, first you walk down a deserted beach, then you find a "bottle" that might contain a genie, then you rub the bottle ... you know the rest.

The definition of "easy" is "someone else has to do it".  Finding a "small inexpensive separator for shallow gas wells" is just not happening.  This is the kind of activity that makes my living, because so many production engineers spec "just a separator" and then when the pipeline rots out or the transporter shuts the well in because of out-of-spec gas they finally call someone with experience in the field and the recomendetaion usually starts with "who sold you that crap?"

You didn't specify your expected gas/water/oil rates, anticipated line pressure, anticipated gas temperature, or whether or not you're anticipating wellhead compression.  

I see a bunch of wells these days that have 3-10 bbl/MMCF of total liquids and gathering pressures under 20 psig with 120F reservoir temperature.  If you do that math, you'll see that the entire liuid stream will move as a vapor that will not even slow down in a mechanical (or centrifigual) separator.  In that case I often recommend not installing any tubing in the well or separation on the surface.

If the math works out that you'll produce significant liquid to surface then you need to do some real math to size your vessels appropriate to the task at hand.  This isn't hard, it is just a task that often gets skipped when people are "doing their engineering off the surplus list" (e.g., put a 16-inch, 1,000 psi vessel with 2-inch nozzles on a well that really needs a 36-inch 280 psig vessel with 6-inch nozzles because "there's one in the yard").

I covered many of these issues in my February 27, 2006 Oil & Gas Journal article on the difference between artificial lift and deliquification.  I've got a companion presentation to that article on my web page (below).  I always try to get people to manage reservoir performance from the burner tip to put appropriate equipment at ever step from the wellbore tubulars through the final sales meter at the customer's plant.  Don't skimp on a simple piece of the kit because it is "just a separator".

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

The harder I work, the luckier I seem

RE: Small inexpensive separator

(OP)
Thanks for the advise.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources