×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

(OP)
We're finding a portion of the 18-8 stainless steel fasteners exceeding the hardness requirements of ASTM F593; which is HRC 32 for the cold-worked condition.  I'm curious on the potential problems and issues that could be encountered with a stainless steel bolt with a core hardness of HRC 33-35.  

It hasn't been tied to one manufacturer, but we've seen some correlation once the carbon content exceeds 0.4% (which is still below the maximum requirement).  
Thanks

RE: 18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

The following is an excerpt from my disapproval of a contractor's proposal to substitute 18-8 fasteners for the specified AISI 304 fasteners:

The term “18-8 stainless steel” is colloquial, loosely grouping a number of AISI stainless steel grades, but also describing a wide range of material that may not be controlled by any governing technical standard.  There is no recognized technical standard controlling the content of “18-8 stainless steel”, the only “requirement” for inclusion in the 18-8 group is that the material contain “about” 18 percent chromium and 8 percent nickel.  There is no limit on the amount of other elements that may be present, some of which may introduce undesirable properties to the alloy if allowed in greater than trace amounts.

RE: 18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

MintJulep,
Agree with you in general, but in this specific case, ASTM F593 has an Alloy Group 1 (304, 304L, 305, 384, 18-9LW, 302HQ)* corresponding to 18-8 compositions.
*There are some additional, free-machining alloys permitted, but only with purchaser's agreement.

kmenke,
ASTM A593 Alloy Group 1 has 8 subdivisions, with 3 having a hardness limit HRC32 (there are also 4 softer grades & 1 harder: max HRC36).  So, do you mean F593C, F593D or F593B?
I suspect that the hardness limits are a safety factor, to preserve an amount of elongation.  Elongation decreases rapidly as hardness & YS increase, from 40% for F593A (hardness B85 max) to 12% for F593A (HRC36 max).
ASTM A593, Table 3, indicates that elongation testing isn't mandatory for all grades, so a maximum hardness limit is a de facto minimum elongation limit. And, hardness is a quick & easy test.

I presume & hope "carbon content exceeds 0.4%" is a typo and that you really meant 0.04% C.

RE: 18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

If the fasteners still have adaquate elongations I wouldn't worry.
Hitting strength levels with various C and N levels can be a real trick.
There are tubing specs where you can accept based on hardness, but not reject.  If the hardness is out of spec you must conduct tensile tests.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
http://www.trent-tube.com/contact/Tech_Assist.cfm

RE: 18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

(OP)
Sorry about the miscue on the carbon content; it was meant to be 0.04%.  

We are dealing with the F593C and F593D, which would be the Group 1, cold-worked condition.  As of now, we have tested approximately 80 different lots (incluidng five manufacturers), and have seen that about 25% of the parts exceed the allowable hardness limit.  We haven't had any parts fail the elongation, but have had a few exceed the maximum allowable tensile strength.  

Thanks for the further insight.  

RE: 18-8 Stainless Fasteners Too Hard

"a core hardness of HRC 33-35" seems a bit odd, as the core should be nearer the lower hardness limits (B80, B95), with the rolled threads near the max. hardness (depends a lot on the diameter).  F593C & F593D bolts are "Headed and rolled from annealed stock thus acquiring a degree of cold work; sizes 0.75 in. and larger may be hot-worked and solution-annealed." -- ASTM F593.  

"a few exceed the maximum allowable tensile strength" --
Perhaps manufactured from strain-hardened stock, so possibly meet the F593A specifications (HRC36 max, higher strengths, lower elongation)?  But, even if so, then are mis-labelled.

Due to liability issues, the out-of-spec lots should be failed.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources