Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...One of the best run forums I have used in years! ...I like the way the site is organized and your no tolerance of flames..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
kpt4321 (Mechanical)
5 Sep 06 13:12
Hello all-

I am attempting to do analysis of a space frame (an automotive chassis composed entirely of tubes) using Pro/E and Mechanica.  I have modeled the frame using datum points connected with datum curves, and am doing FEA using the beam sections capabilities of Mechanica.

However, with a recent iteration of the frame, I am running into problems in element creation.  If I try to run an analysis it errors out ("Mechanica could not generate elements for all the entities in the model"), and using AutoGEM to create the mesh results in an error message stating that "the highlighted element edge is not associated with the highlighted curve."  Multiple datum curves are highlighted (approximately half of the ones in the model) and they do not have any specific/distinct properties that I know of.

It is worth stating that all of my Mechanica knowledge is self-taught; they offer courses in advanced modeling at my university (which I have taken), but no instruction in terms of Mechanica.  I have run many space-frame analyses before, and have not seen this error.
kpt4321 (Mechanical)
8 Sep 06 0:28
Some solution information, for the record:

The cryptic error message I was getting meant that there was a problem with the datum curves which I was using to define my beam sections.  I do not know exactly what the problem was, likely an issue with an overlap or a gap between beams.  I was able to resolve the issue by reming the problem features, and carefully redifining them from scratch.  I am not sure what the specific error was being caused by.

Hope this benefits someone!
Tgatica (Mechanical)
25 Nov 06 23:01
I have had good success using simple sketches.  The trick is to define datum planes such that the sketch end points line up if the elements are not in the same plane.  Alternatively you could define the end points with datum points then use "point to point" when defining beams.

Tony

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close