×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl
5

Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

(OP)
Hello;

I need to control a 220 VAC Inductive Load from a TTL/CMOS control.

I always thought that SSRs were designed for this task. But, a co-worker says a mechanical relay driven by a ULN2003 or IRF511 and controlled by TTL/CMOS, would do just as well. I think the mechanical relay solution is very risky.

I need info on the SSR advantage.

Thanks.

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

SSR: PLUS: don't wear out, fast, needs low power
No spart, less HF radiation.
MINUS: less forgiving about overload, momentary OL
can kill it.

MR: PLUS: can tolerate/survive momentary overload
MINUS: limited life-time, more power to drive it.
Sparking causes more HF.

Plesae read FAQ240-1032
My WEB: <http://geocities.com/nbucska/>

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

2
Some triac-based SSR's don't like highly inductive loads - the triac is unable to fully recover its blocking state before the device is forward biased again. Those using antiphase SCR's are much better in this respect. The following link has a fair list of the pros and cons of SSRs. I haven't read the whole article - there is some good and bad in the section I skimmed. Caveat emptor!

http://www.epanorama.net/circuits/semiconductor_relays.html

----------------------------------
  Sometimes I only open my mouth to swap feet...

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

I always consider what happens when it fails.

The typical failure mode of an SSR is shorted output - it won't turn off.

What happens to your inductive load when you can't turn off the power?

Thanks, Scotty, for the link.  Excellent summary.

Dan

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

(OP)
Thanks, for your replies.  All the info was good.
But, I need to know about driving large AC inductive loads from a TTL/CMOS logic control signal.  

I thought that leakage currents were more likely in a mechanicl relay. And the leakage currents, even if buffered by a ULN2003, or IRF511, could work their way back to the TTL/CMOS circuit, and zap it.

Even if SSR and Mechanical Relays are equal in safty. I like the SSR for the simplicity of circuit connection.

Thanks again, in advance
 

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

Leakage currents??? You lost me.  Where are these leakage currents you're thinking of leaking from and to?

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

A TTL circuit can be easily zapped.  A ssr should be a much easier load to work with than the inductive coil of a mechanical relay.

Either the mech relay or the ssr will offer isolation from the final 220vac inductive load and your control (ttl) circuit.

There is some leakage current between the ssr and the final load.  But that should not impact the ttl part of your circuit.  

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

(OP)
When dealing with large AC inductive load, say 220vac 10a, I thought current flowing through a mechanical relay's contacts could generate a magnetic field around the contact.
the relay's coil becomes a secondary of a psudo-transformer.
The AC current could find a path from the relay coil, back to the TTL/CMOS source and zap it.

I thought that such a condition would be happen with an SSR.

So, for this large AC inductive load, am I safer with the TTL/CMOS driving an SSR?

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

I see.. Well the phenomenon you describe while possible is not at all likely. There are billions of relays controlling 10's of amps being run by embedded controllers that have no problem with that phenomenon.  I would never even consider it. (Under about 80A) My electric range has multiple 10+ Amp mechanical relays run by the micro mounted on the same 8" x 5" circuit board.

Now improper layout and ignoring the inductive kick of the relay's coil will  cause you problems.  The standard solution is to put a diode across the DC coil (parallel) to it but in the non conducting direction (when energizing the relay).

Mechanical relay's are generally much less expensive then SSRs, and provide no heating issues. SSR's can have serious heating issues and are lossy (have a voltage drop) whereas mechanical relays can be considered to have no losses(in most cases).

Unless you have a rapidly switching application or need the zero current switching of an SSR they often don't make much sense.  As previously mentioned SSR's don't even work with large inductive loads but are often destroyed by them.

We can give you more info if you describe your application in more detail.  What load? What switching rate? What's controlling the relay?

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

(OP)
Thanks Flamin, You gave me the answer I needed.

Paul

RE: Need info on SSR advantage for 220 vac contorl

Quote:

I thought current flowing through a mechanical relay's contacts could generate a magnetic field around the contact.
the relay's coil becomes a secondary of a psudo-transformer.
The AC current could find a path from the relay coil, back to the TTL/CMOS source and zap it.
That sounds to me lke an Electronics Engineers forensic deduction when trying to figure out why his CMOS device died. The phenomenon has nothing to do with it being a contactor and magnetic fields around the contacts, it's all about "inductive kick" of the coil itself, which can be (and is) successfully suppressed with RC snubbers, MOVs etc.

JRaef.com
Eng-Tips: Help for your job, not for your homework  Read FAQ731-376 pirate

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources