×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

(OP)
I have now worked for two large organisations that have severe problems using massive Unigraphics assemblies inside Pro/ENGINEER.

Third-parties are the design responsibles for modules used within our systems, and they use some Unigraphics.

We need to include the geometry of their modules in our systems, but it needs to be manageable (speed/display), and solid.  Solid geometry is required to allow us to do interference checking and generate cross-sections.

I can successfully import a Unigraphics assembly into a Pro/ENGINEER assembly, the resulting ProE assembly being completely solid.

Why don’t I use this within our system?  Because if I put the assembly in our Pro/INTRALINK database, we would have literally hundreds of parts with a “manifold blah, blah” reference submitted into our database.

I can’t foresee that I can suppress parts in my ProE assembly during the submission, as designers will need to see parts when an assembly is retrieved.  Asking them to resume parts every time they use assemblies isn’t workable.

Thus I wanted to “squash” my Pro/ENGINEER assembly into a Pro/ENGINEER part, and submit this part into the database.

I have performed this operation successfully, but it isn’t a reliable way to work.  Perhaps 8 times in 10 the process doesn’t work and gives me a surface model instead.

I’m sure that I will get suggestions about making simplified reps of my ProE assembly, but I don’t want to get involved in deciding what I must include and exclude.  I say this because the modules we are importing contain PCBs with many components, and we can’t request our suppliers to make special models to aid this issue.

I have tried exporting flat assemblies from my ProE assembly, in STEP, IGES and Parasolid format, but I keep getting surface models when I import the file into a Pro/ENGINEER part.

My suspicion is that the corruption is created through interferences in the imported assembly – things such as screw threads, wires, legs of connectors.

I am going to do some tests where I break out groups of components from my ProE assembly, and afterwards merge them into my ProE part.  I would propose hardware as one group, electrics/electronics, and “the rest”.

Does anybody use a methodology that could solve my problem?

Does anybody have experience with third-party translators?

Thanks in advance

Dave

RE: Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

I think we all had these experiences. You will need to close the surfaces.

You will not find a magic method to automatic close tsome tiny surfaces. You can try using diiferent accuracy.

You can call also some "specialized" companies who will translate them for you. It will cost, but no more headaches.

-Hora

RE: Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

What format is the data in when you import it into Pro/E? STEP, IGES, Parasolid, UG native?

Each of these methods produces diffferent results when imported into Pro/E. Also, some of these can be imported as both part and assembly files.

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli
Sr IS Technologist
L-3 Communications

RE: Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

(OP)
It is a zipped STEP file.

I have just arrived and haven't had a chance to speak to the supplier about trying different configurations.

I'd still like to try less hardware and less PCBs to at least try and get the large bespoke parts to translate properly.

In the past I have found inporting Parasolids is a more robust process.  Parasolids is a later developent than STEP I think, and hence more robust and problem free???

Cheers

Dave

RE: Massive Unigraphics assy into ProE part

We had problems with Parasolid imports on some simple parts into Pro/E while STEP would come through fine.
The surface data may be surfaces in UG, so check that with the supplier.

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli
Sr IS Technologist
L-3 Communications

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources