×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

(OP)
I was looking for opinions regarding the support conditions for an underhung crane beam.  Simply supported single span vs. continuous 2 span.  (20 ft vs. 40 ft)

This would be with respect to alignment issues and unbraced length.

Thanks

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

With the crane running under the rail, you can provide support for the compression flange for a simply sup arrangement and I'd have thought that all economy is lost when you have to choose a flange robust enough to cope with a compression flange length the kind that you will end up with in a continuous arrangment.

Alten  

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

(OP)
The longer unbraced length reduces your allowable stress.  In this case the selected beam for the simply supported condition is also adequate for the continuous beam; with a reduced allowable stress.

There was an AISC article that recommended the simply supported condition without discussion regarding the recommendation.

Alignment is also a concern; although in either case I believe the CMAA guidelines are more strict.

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

Not sure about the safety regulations, but I would imagine that a double span would require at least 2 construction cranes for installation, and the single span would only require 1.

This may more than offset any savings.

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

Take a look at AISC Design Guide 7.  They discuss simple span vs. continuous.

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

mrengineer
For those of us not living in the US could you post the salient points of the discussion?

Thanks

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

Here's the listed advantages of simple spans:
    a. Easier to design.
    b. Unaffected by differential settlements.
    c. More easily replaced if damaged.
    d. More easily reinforced.

Here's the advantages of continuous beams:
    a. Reduced deflections.
    b. Reduced end rotations and movements
    c. Lighter shapes.

But it also includes the provision that fatigue may be much more significant with continuous steel runway beams in that they have more "parts" that are in tension.

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

Thanks JAE

From what I've seen simple spans are certainly a lot more common.

RE: Simply Supported vs. 2 Span Continuous Beam for Crane Beam

I always design/detail the runway beams for top running cranes as simple span.  Underhung cranes are another animal.  To quote AISC Design Guide 7, "The splice should allow for a smooth running crane as the wheels transfer from one beam to the next".  They show a typical splice detail for underhung runway beams, with field welded web splice plates (bolted for erection only, remove bolts after welding to avoid interference with crane wheels), and full pen weld at bottom flange.  The only thing I take exception with is the idea of having only the bottom flange full pen welded.  My thought is that once you have introduced some degree of continuity by welding the bottom flange, you may end up with distress in the web connection.  Therefore I call for weld at both top and bottom flanges.  I design as simple span, using appropriate equations for lateral torsional buckling.  Have had no problems whatsoever to my knowledge.      

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources