Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
(OP)
I am using SolidWorks 2006. I try my hardest to use SolidWorks properly, so that I can take advantage of all of its automated functions. Therefore, I have a tendency to include all nuts, bots, washers, etc. in my assemblies, so that I do not have to overide any quantities in my BOMs. I try not to overide the BOMs because I loose connectivity (that just doesn't sit well with me). Am I just being anal? What do you folks do to address this issue? Is there a better way to trick the BOM, other than overiding the QTY. directly? Thank you very much.
I am eager to read any thoughts or comments on this topic!
I am eager to read any thoughts or comments on this topic!






RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Linear Patterns work well.
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Steven K. Roberts, Technomad
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Yes the BOM can be modified to suit whatever information you care to include, but if you call up a hardware-less assy into another product & then do an indented BOM, the required hardware will not be listed.
Some users include the correct quantities of hardware, but place them at one position on top of each other.
Others place "dummy" parts (parts with no geometry, just properties) either on top of each other or place them using feature (or other) patterns to get the quantities associative.
You are not "being anal" ... you are using the software the way it was intended and IMO the best way.
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
SA
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
It is amazing how many problems one finds and corrects before they hit the manufacturing floor when adding all the hardware.
Regards,
Anna Wood
SW06 SP4.1 x64, WinXP x64
Dell Precision 380, Pentium D940, 4 Gigs RAM, FX3450
www.auerprecision.com
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
We usually start an empty excel table in the drawing, make it the same size as our BOM, stick it underneath the BOM, then put the hardware on that. We usually have anywhere from 20-50 unique components and subassemblies in an assembly, so we'll start numbering the hardware at 61 or 101, or whatever nubmer makes sense - one that we know the assebmly parts will never get to.
Then we put balloons and stacked balloons where the hardware would go and add custom numbers to them.
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Speeds things up with big assys if you can easily hide the hardware.
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
I have just completed the design of a steel space frame, screwed together Meccano style. The design made it difficult to take advantage of the component patterns, inserting around eighty fastener instances was a pain in the ass.
While installing the fasteners, I observed that many of my nuts were not sufficiently accessible to be turned by wrenches. I fixed the problem easily in SolidWorks. It would have been a mess at assembly time.
When I was done, I copied my parts list out of SolidWorks into a company purchase requisition I have hacked to conform to SolidWorks. I have no intention of ever going into the drawing and calculating the number of holes and the number of fasteners required. I do not even want to do this once, much less do it every time I need to know how many fasteners there are.
There is also the not so minor matter of correctly specifying how long the bolts are.
The standard excuse for not adding hardware is that there is no time. Usually, there is also no time to prepare purchase requisitions (production can figure it out) and provide assembly help. The the people in engineering who do try to do all this stuff find out that production cannot be bothered to read drawings anymore. I think this is all connected.
JHG
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Without them you can screw up a design and drive you nuts finding where the errors are.
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
"If you have time to do it twice, you have time to do it right the first time!"
We do not add powder-coat color and texture on our BOM's, that is done on our routing system (Made2manage), but some will add an empty part in the assembly for paint, adhesives, etc.
Flores
SW06 SP4.1
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP
www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Just make sure your subassembly (the hardware stackup) doesn't have any mates to the subassembly (planes etc) only with the other components.
-Shaggy
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
1. It is a pain putting them in.
2. When you have a large machine assembly you start to see serious slow downs after adding them.
I wouldn't bother putting these on a BOM either. In our case you just average out how many of these small components you use per annum and divide by the amount of machines. Now set it up on your MRP system that each machine draws down X amount of nuts and Y amount of washers. To control stock levels set up a minimum weight of these and top up to some pre determined level when you hit the minimum. To control which nuts, bolts and washer are used on the floor we have Works Instructions that list the types of nuts/bolts/washers to use on certain types of application.
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Steven K. Roberts, Technomad
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
The subassembly has all the necessary mates between the components to lock them down (with the exception of the clamping thickness if it uses a nut). It has no mates to the origin or planes of that subassembly. When the subassembly is inserted it is mated to the hole. Only a concentric, coincident, and a parallel (also a second coincident if the stackup uses a nut) are necessary. When the subassembly is disolved, the mates between all of the parts remain.
This method does not help the issue of having a lot of mates in the top level assy, but it will speed up the process of inserting a lot of similar fastener stackups where patterns won't work.
-Shaggy
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
My question about Configuration Tables a week ago was about this precise problem. I had to change the size of each of my 160+ fastener instances. I had anticipated this somewhat.
I tried installing each fastener set as a subassembly, and I inserted an exploded BOM on the drawing. I was not happy with the results. Dissolving around eighty subassemblies is practically as messy as installing each fastener individually, especially when you have a lot of component patterns to update.
When I had to resize everything, I managed it from the design table.
JHG
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
I agree with your statements. This method doesn't make dealing with the fasteners any easier and with that many fasteners dissolving will take a while. The patterns should be created after dissolving.
Proper planning and the use of design tables are the way to go.
Also, a macro could be created to dissolve multi-selected subassemblies. That would probably be kinda slick.
-Shaggy
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
--
Hardie "Crashj" Johnson
SW 2005 SP 4.0 (reluctant to change)
Nvidia Quadro FX 1000
AMD Athalon 1.8 GHz 2 Gig RAM
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
The scale of our exploded parts book illustrations generally means the fasteners are tiny dots, so having them there doesn't add anything either.
The model overhead of having those mates doesn't make it worth it, generally.
There are always exceptions (such as when we're concerned with close approach clearances).
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
I'm just starting with Solidworks and am curious.
Thanks,
-Mike
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
However a Top Level assy with an Indented BOM can be used to form the basis of a home-made parts tracking system. I usually create a separate TL drawing for just that purpose because my company doesn't have MRP.
Helpful SW websites FAQ559-520
How to get answers to your SW questions FAQ559-1091
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
Chris
Systems Analyst, I.S.
SolidWorks 06 4.1/PDMWorks 06
AutoCAD 06
ctopher's home (updated 06-21-06)
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
That's what I thought. There are many more things that a BOM needs to do like keeping track of what's in stock, make or buy parts, phantom parts, shop work orders, and so on, that suggests to me that there should be an accounting/mfg BOM too. The small company I work at now plans on using only the Solidworks BOM however.
Thanks for the help.
-Mike
RE: Do You Include ALL NUTS and BOLTS in Your Assemblies?
MRP BOMs should be generated from engineering parts lists. SolidWorks is an efficient tool for generating engineering parts lists.
The real trick is getting engineering, manufacturing and purchasing to agree on a data format, so that we can copy and paste information back and forth.
A major advantage of SolidWorks and its BOM is that standard hardware is always called up exactly the same way in enginerring parts lists. There should be no more of MRP having an entry for CAP SCR HEX SOCKET 1/4X1-1/2 and and entry for HEX SOCKET CAP SCREW 1/4-=20UNC X 1.500 and another entry for HSCS .250X1.500, etc.
JHG