×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Is this possible ?
2

Is this possible ?

Is this possible ?

(OP)
Humid air contains more energy than the same amount of
dry air and water at the same temperature.

Would it be possible to take humid air ( e.g. at sea )
compress it, with heat exchenger cool it, precipitate
the water and recover the energy from heat and pressure
to drive the compressor.

Would this be useful for producing clean water?
Perhaps even end up with  some energy left over ?

Plesae read FAQ240-1032
My WEB: <http://geocities.com/nbucska/>

RE: Is this possible ?

Sounds like a perpetual-motion device to me- things that are mixed don't easily unmix themselves- 2nd Law.

RE: Is this possible ?

nbucska,
The difficulty comes from your second step. You want to start with humid air (which does have more energy than the equivalent amounts of dry air and liquid water). You then compress this air. This is an energy intensive step, and inherently/practically has a fair amount of irreversibility (lost work) to it. Now comes step two - cool the compressed air. This removes much of the energy contained in the compressed humid gas, especially if accompanied by condensation. Furthermore, it is likely heat that will be rejected as waste heat to atmosphere or some heat sink. So what energy will you recover? The only energy to recover is what I've called "waste heat". That has low utility since its temperature will likely be quite low; it is not likely to be a source of useful energy. While I hate to sound so negative, I cannot be optimistic about this. Try analyzing the overall process using the second law of thermodynamics.
Doug

RE: Is this possible ?

(OP)
djack:
The heat could be pumped from the compressed humid air to
heat up the dry air. I realize that efficiencies are
important but even if there is some energy loss,
it may be useful to make clean water if it require
less energy than distillation.

Plesae read FAQ240-1032
My WEB: <http://geocities.com/nbucska/>

RE: Is this possible ?

Why not skip the compression and just go directly to the cool the air to condense the water?

RE: Is this possible ?

as other rsponders have already mentioned the question about efficiency, i'll leave that one and ask ...

why will the water be clean ?  won't it have all the impurities (junk) that's floating around in the air now ?

and how much water are you looking to produce ? i don't know the %age volume of water in humid air, but i'm willing to speculate that it's not much.

we've speculated that this process isn't efficient, you've responded that maybe it is more efficient than distillation.  maybe it is, maybe it isn't, maybe no-one has thought of this process before (i think that's unlikely), but certainly people have invested in distillation plants and i think they'd've considered the alternatives.

but what the heck, give it a whirl and see what happens.

RE: Is this possible ?

Why you have to compress the air:  I think the intent is to cool it to ambient to condense water out, not chill it below ambient- requires only a heat exchanger, not a refrigeration unit.

I don't think it would be too hard to show that the whole process violated the 2nd law, though.  Whip out that Thermodynamics textbook and go to work.

RE: Is this possible ?

As this seems to be an "at sea" exercise, I'm thinking it may be possible to get a surface below the dew-point using only water, possibly enhanced by evaporative cooling.  I haven't given it much thought, but certainly possible, at least a portion of the time.  Obviously can't beat the second law, but might be able to get the required energy for free.

Thermal energy storage is another possibility.

Condensing water to drink out of air is a known technique.  It is taught in survival schools, often called a "solar still".

I believe that sailing ships of yore collected the morning dew from the sails.

RE: Is this possible ?

Again, to get the water out you must ultimately drop the temperature below the dew point, so what do you do. You compress it and raise the temperature of the fluid which gets you nowhere, since you have to cool it or perform an expansion to cool it to where you would be in the first place and you have expended a high form of energy of compression to a more useless form of energy in the form of heat. So the best you can do is cool it without compression. Where are you going to get this magical cooling system-- maybe by evaporative cooling using spray or water tower cooling with no access to the heat energy you have extracted which went into the water used for cooling. Moreover, if by some magic you could get this energy, it would be in too low a form to do the useful work you imagine. There goes that perpetual motion machine.
And by the way there is  no violation of the 2nd law of thermo, only the uselessness of the form of energy you have extracted.

RE: Is this possible ?

What you could do is cool the sea air using an air to water heat exchanger,(a chilled water coil). Heres the interesting part with a question in it. How far below the ocean surface would you have to go to reach water that is say 40-45 degrees F? You could pump this to the surface to run through the chilled water coil to condense the moisture out of the air. The water may not have to be that cold (40_45) it would depend on the dewpoint of the air your working with. I think hurricane air would work bestpipe. But seriuosly, I have read about a similar application using deep lake water to get free cooling at a University back east (USA).
  You still have the purity issues to deal with, and I know nothing is free, but as clean water becomes less and less available this might be an interesting process to explore.

I'm not a real engineer, but I play one on T.V.
 A.J. Gest, York Int./JCI

RE: Is this possible ?

Basically, a heat engine would be required to get usable energy out.  In order to get any decent amount of work out, you need a substantial temperature difference.  If you plan on using a compressor to establish that temperature difference, you will never be able to produce more work out than you are putting in.  That can be proved by the second law.

RE: Is this possible ?

Well, I looked up ocean temperatures. Thars cold water down thar. But you might have to go aways down to git it. Looking at a rough graph it could be as deep as 500 meters or more for the good stuff. On the other hand your ft/hd required wouldn't extend the full 500 meters would it. Just what ever hieght your miracle water maker is above the ocean surface. That might not be too bad!!

I'm not a real engineer, but I play one on T.V.
 A.J. Gest, York Int./JCI

RE: Is this possible ?

Nbucska,
 When you get rich and famous don't forget the little guys out there bangin around these fool hardy notions.

I'm not a real engineer, but I play one on T.V.
 A.J. Gest, York Int./JCI

RE: Is this possible ?

Okay, look at the original post.  Package this process in a black box and here's what you get:
Humid air at ambient temperature comes in.
Dry air at ambient temperature (perhaps colder) goes out.
Water at ambient temperature goes out.
Heat goes out.
And is that process possible?  I think not.

For that matter, if you have a black box that sits there sucking in humid air and putting out heat all on it's own, let's just hook it up to a steam engine and get some free energy off that heat while we're at it.

RE: Is this possible ?

Sure, it's recoverable, it's just too low level to be usable.

A typical thermopile requires the temperature of a burning fuel to generate electricity.

TTFN



RE: Is this possible ?

I think djack77494 got it finished in the 2nd reply.  This is an air-standard brayton thermodynamic cycle in which nbucska has asked can it be closed up to complete the cycle.  djack said it right with what I can summarise as a No, as the quality of the heat source isn't good enough to drive what would be a turbine to run the air compressor.

So if you are going to condense water out of air, you should probably target cool humid air that requires slightly less energy removal to condense.

RE: Is this possible ?

(OP)
york:
I was engineer for 30+ yrs, got 10+ patents which is not enough to be famous. For that you have to be a singer
or football player.

I used "clean" as shorthand for "reasonably saltfree
to be usable for drinking or irrigation"

Jstephen:
The mixture of oil and water has higher entropy but still
separates sponteneously.

The humid air has latent heat, too.

ALL:
Would the efficiency ( friction,heat losses ) be
better if it were scaled up?


 

Plesae read FAQ240-1032
My WEB: <http://geocities.com/nbucska/>

RE: Is this possible ?

Nope, it's too low a level.  Consider that it's about as warm as a human body.  At that, it would more practical to use a human body, since its temperature is relative constant.  And yet, cardiac pacemakers use batteries.

TTFN



RE: Is this possible ?

In a lossless closed loop of compression/decompression, you would need to add the energy required to transport the moisture through the loop. The transporting of moisture is the 'work', the loop would be the vehicle.

But alas, we must add in losses. As you are likely aware, mechanical methods are lossy, so calc your transport load, then add your losses.

If you had a waste heat source available, you'd have your transport energy.

attaching some form of your idea to an energy waste stream may actually decrease it's 'wastefullness'. You'll still be consuming but the net result may have benefit.

RE: Is this possible ?

This is an odd thread.  Yes, you can get water vapor to condense by changing its pressure and temperature.  The problem is that the process has a very low effeciency (on the order of 10% of the energy input is used for water production).  You would be way ahead to accelerate the evaporation by recovering some of the waste heat from the engine.

Nothing about this process is "perputual motion", it would require a huge energy input.

David

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

The harder I work, the luckier I seem

RE: Is this possible ?

Oil and water do separate themselves spontaneously.  However, the separation is mechanical.  During the mixing of an oil-water suspension there is energy stored as surface tension potential (surface area vs. volume ratio is high) and gravitational potential (water is heavier than oil).  Comparison does not apply.  

RE: Is this possible ?

(OP)
Thank, Morten, this seems to prove that the idea is possible and Mr. Michaud has found a way to realize it.

Would a star an acceptable expression of thanks?

Plesae read FAQ240-1032
My WEB: <http://geocities.com/nbucska/>

RE: Is this possible ?

an interesting article, but i can't help but wonder if the tornado will from if there's a turbine taking energy out of the system ?  and if the tornado is solar powered, how will it keep running ?

just another skeptic ...

RE: Is this possible ?

"this seems to prove that the idea is possible"- with the exceptions that the compression and cooling in the original scenario have been removed, and the process now requires heat input from solar.

" and Mr. Michaud has found a way to realize it"- but in fact it seems Mr. Michaud is a long ways from realizing even his idea.

The original cycle is very close to running an evaporative cooler in reverse, for what that's worth.

RE: Is this possible ?

Back in 70's there was an attempt to develop a non Freon auto air conditioner "Rovac" using air.
The automobile use didn't workout so an attempt was made to use it in a mode similar to original post, cool the house and get potable water. My last information was that work was continuing but results had been as expected.

As for trapping water it is being done on a very large scale in Chile and Peru using fine mesh nylon nets as collectors tied to a central cistern. It is giving thousands of people clean fresh water for the first time.

As for the water collecting on a sail as you will definately get wet standing under a sail if the boat isn't moving too fast.

RE: Is this possible ?

Compressing air whatever the humidity means the air is heated up, cooling this in a heat exchanger presumably at the same pressure will put air through dew point & dry or de humidify the air this water can be drained off with a slight loss of pressure.

The condensate will be water with all the impurities from the air & process (non-potable) & will have contamination from the compression process (possibly oil).

The amoung of energy used in compression, cooling the heat exchanger (pumps), a source of cooling for the heat exchanger either sea water or some form of fridge take energy away from the mass of compressed air.

The amount & form of energy left in compressed air has to be less that that invested in the system & has to be in a usable form - essentially any compressed air "motor" is inefficient as it kaes air at one pressure & releases it to atmosphere in one pass.

Energy is used & not multiplied or for that matter easily stored.

Bruce L Farrar.
Works Engineering Manager
Marshalls Mono PLC.Brookfoot Works.
Halifax W.Yorks UK

RE: Is this possible ?

There is a commercial unit for condensing water from humid air.

http://www.wataireindustries.com/

They even have residential units. They have quite a bit of information on their site.

RE: Is this possible ?

I have accessed the site for the commercial water generators, fair play guys I have learnt something I wasnt aware of.

Refering back to the original question this product is not quite the same in terms of recovering energy to drive the device (which simply cannot be done due to inefficiencies)

One question that puzzles me still is that the atmosphere contains all sorts of contamination (one in particular legionella is present in most of the air we breath - its only when it becomes waterborn, is incubated, then atomised into droplets breahted by susceptible people a problem arises)

How does the system overcome this contamination ?

Commercial fresh water generators (evaporating or distilling) sea water into fresh potable water have to take the water past 180 deg f & have certain restrictions if the sea water contains effluent (as most coastal water does) - simply passing the water condensed by refrigeration through filters etc etc - I will get some data from the makers & update my head with the latest technology !!

I am interested as to how much power these units use in electrical terms & whether these are used in marine environments - as the system gets around the destruction caused by sea water - the marine engineers curse !

Bruce L Farrar.
Works Engineering Manager
Marshalls Mono PLC.Brookfoot Works.
Halifax W.Yorks UK

RE: Is this possible ?

I think it was mentioned briefly above:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_thermal_energy_conversion

There are plans to use the temperature differential between shallow and deep water to generate power.  Honestly I've never heard of it actually being used, but we'll see what happens as oil $ continues to rise.  

RE: Is this possible ?

in Toronto, they're using cold water (from the bottom of the lake) as an airconditioning refridgerant for some the city buildings ... it'll save electricity.

RE: Is this possible ?

There was a big experiment off Hawaii several years ago that eat up a lot of money. I remember that we had a Hx on order and it was put aside while the fabricator work on a super large Ti exchanger for the Hawaii Thermal Project.


I think this project was like the Oil Shale project out west, it got over fertilized with money and died.

Anecdote:
I was instrumental in purchasing an all SS centrifugal compressor leftover from the Oil Shale Project. It was brand new in the box and only 10 years old. There was a very good discount on it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources