×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Liquidity index for material containing +#40

## Liquidity index for material containing +#40

(OP)
As you probably know, Atterberg limit tests are run on the portion of the soil passing the #40 sieve.  If a soil contains a small amount of larger material, one could, I presume, calculate the liquidity index with an adjusted water content that ignores the +#40 material:

w-adj = wt of water / wt of -#40 * 100

In effect, this associates all the water with the -#40 fraction, assuming that the larger particles "float" within the -#40 matrix and do not aDsorb or aBsorb much water.  (The equation can be tweaked easily to allow the larger particles to adsorb or absorb some small amount of water.)

How much +#40 material can be present before the liquidity index ceases to be meaningful for things like remolded shear strength?

### RE: Liquidity index for material containing +#40

I would say that as long as the majority of the +#40 particles are not in point to point contact that the liquidity index would be usefull for things like shear strength.  In those cases your description of the particles floating in a matrix of -#40 particles is the way I have described it in the past.

In honesty, I have not been concerned about lager particles until the particle size is quite a bit larger, say 0.5 to 1 inch.  If you are concerned about the effect of the non-tested particles, run a shear strength test on undisturbed samples.

Hope I helped.

### RE: Liquidity index for material containing +#40

I see the liquidity index to be really only "good" for fine grained soils anyway - so, as per USCS, your soil must contain >50% passing #200 sieve size.  The #40 sieve takes into account fine and medium sand - so I would say that if you have any significant (I know - quantify) material >#40, the liquidity index wouldn't be an appropriate index property in any event. Example:  You have a roadway base course - the Atterberg limits can be determined on the -#40 sieve - but the liquidity index is really meaningless for a roadway base anyway - the only reason to know the Atterbergs is to determine if the fines are potentially expansive/contractive which might lead to pavement breakup - also to determine binder properties.
Good question though!

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!