×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Promotions Vs. wave linking

Promotions Vs. wave linking

Promotions Vs. wave linking

(OP)
Hi,
  I was wondering what is the difference between using Promotions and Wave linking for interpart modeling? Also the benifits one way or the other.  We currently use Wave linking for all of our interpart modeling.  Thanks in advance!!

RE: Promotions Vs. wave linking

I used wave linking for taking geometry to another part that will influence the part.
I used promotions for adding features to an existing body in the assembly.

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli
Sr IS Technologist
L-3 Communications

RE: Promotions Vs. wave linking

Check the NX help documents.  They give a good explanation of WAVE and Promotions.

In a nutshell, what looslib said.....

RE: Promotions Vs. wave linking

(OP)
Thanks loosib and fgbrender! Makes sense to me now ;)

RE: Promotions Vs. wave linking

Most of time,I removed the parameters after I WAVE a part.

RE: Promotions Vs. wave linking

(OP)
We use linking mostly to mantain a link to customer geo. such as a core stick or casting file.  Mainly because of the amount of eng. changes, which makes updating the coreboxes and patterns more automated.

RE: Promotions Vs. wave linking

Essentially Promotions are not much different then Geometry Links, Actually you can convert Promotions to Geometry links. With saying that Promotions should not be used, but instead use Link Geometry. I would be even inclined to convert all promotions to Geometry links. There is a setting to automatically do this, That sounds dangerous. I would like to force the change myself, just in case it goes wrong.

WAVE is not the same as Geometry links. Even though they appear to allow the same type of linking. They are more like cousins. Geometry links require an assembly or can link geometry within the part. WAVE is primarily used to create a high level dependency and share and build knowledge (datums, general geometry, expressions, rules. Some software packages call this a skeleton. This is not to be shared outside of the company. Then push it over the fence and have a component that is then added to an assembly. WAVE can link to files without requiring an assembly. Now you build your component using that linked geometry.

WAVE can be used to create a customer NX file without giving them the product knowledge, Keeping the internal faces on the body the same, easily updated, They won't see any assembly structure so no errors, the file can contain one or many solids, the solid can be simplified and then WAVE linked.

There should not be any need to remove parameters on any solid. Using WAVE will create an object in another file, there is not any other information in the file that a customer or supplier can extract, especialy if you simplify the model first sort of like a black box.

-Dave
PLM Exchange
http://plmexchange.net
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/NX_CAX/

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources