×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Boulder Retaining Walls

Boulder Retaining Walls

Boulder Retaining Walls

(OP)
Is the standard practice for designing Boulder Retaining walls to model it as a gravity retaining wall?  Even though the boulders are segmental and not interlocked?  If not are there references out there that provide adequate design methods?  Any help on this subject would be great.

I have been told that boulder wall design is more by "rule of thumb" and that there is not a way to calculate a Factor of Safety for sliding and overturning.  If this is the case how does one satisfy the typical adopted Building Code of a community that typically states all walls over 4' must be engineered and have a FS of greater than 1.5 for overturning and sliding?

Thanks

RE: Boulder Retaining Walls

(OP)
It seems that this is a somewhat common question regarding the design of Rock Gravity retaining walls, aka Rockery.  I have read thru all the threads pertaining to this answer and sounds like the jury is still out on this one.

Any comments regarding the problem with showing that a rock gravity wall can have a factor of safety greater than 1.5? How do other jurisdictions deal with this?

RE: Boulder Retaining Walls

It is doubful that "boulder walls" built as gravity walls exceed 4 feet by much.  If they are done by the "rule of thumb" with width being at least one third the height, there appears to be sufficient interlocking to do the job.

Any of these should be "designable" using earth pressurea and similar data to come up with a SF.

Those that I have seen that go much higher are built with mortar between the rocks, giving some degree of strength, fitting a design method.

Some very high ones (20 to 30 feet) do not seem to fit with any design, but are more or less "facing" of an earth slope that otherwise would stand by itself, except for face erosion.  These generally are laid back at that "stable earth" slope angle.  There is no design, other than the stability design of an earth slope.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources